V8landy

Looking for anyway I can get my solar thermal I had installed in 2008 MCS for the RHI . System is genesis (r m solar ) 2x 2sq meter panels. House has EPC of B81 Have MCS for solar PV system installed this April, I belive deadline is april next year. If anyone can help me please pm Thanks

Thanks guys I think I am making progress. I am now using Photobucket linked to the wifes facebook, so finding loads of pics we had forgotten about. And the holiday from last year, I remembered we lost our camera before we went away on holiday so borrowed my parents, so pics should be still on their card as they barley know how to turn it on. Looks like crisis averted, but just shows how quick things can go wrong when u do not know what you are doing!!! Multiple back-up is the way forward and some paper and cds thrown in as well.

How true! It is just **** law that when I am wiping my pc, the back up goes wrong!. It is looking like CRC error. I have most things elese where, but just need a couple of files off it. I am running chkdsk G: /f /r on it now, and then somone at work has other "psecialist" software that might work. I have used photbucket in the past, so will push on with that, but also another cloud one like google drive. Anyway fingers crossed it will work.

No I did not delete them, they just seam to be corrupted! Trying some software now, fingers crossed

Urgent before I get divorced! Need to recover the family photo that have gone wrong on the external usb drive? Which software to use?

CCTV cam is http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/120982137113 I have tried try going to http://113.116.103.245:10540/ "user" "user" and it is just a white page, nothing on. You have pm

Camera has app (Bi smarteye), and phone is blackberry, but I have just tried going via phone browser to my static and it just connection timmed out. On my pc, if i type in static IP (name) my netgear router page comes up, but if I add the :81 (port used) it says " This web page is not available

i have made some progress, as now when I use the a port checker and my static DDNS it says "port open" but

Thanks guys for the replys. As I said to my wife, "it is very simple but complicated" !!! OK, so basic I have an IP CCTV cam I am trying to view outside of my network. I am with BT, so understand my IP is not static, which is need for the CCTV. I have set-up a static IP via http://www.dnsdynamic.org/ So how do I use this? I know IP of CCTV cam and its port, I have opened my firewall to WAN for the cam port.

I have! and found the above, but still does not work.

Had to do the e111 form for my parent yesterday and I ended up at the site above. It is not a scan site, but it is a rip off when the main site is free. this is the free /propper site https://www.ehic.org.uk/Internet/startApplication.do

I have given up with the BT hub and gone back to my old netgear (DG834GT) but still can not get it to port forward. I have followed this And checked on this site http://www.port-forwarding.net/port-forwarding-software/port_tester.pl?remote_address=86.160.103.59&port_number=7979&Submit=check But still port says closed. Any help?

Are these more what you need?

Hi, I am looking for some help in setting up a new IP web camera. I have managed to get a picture on the PC, but don't think I have done the port forwarding thing correctly. The instructions given are for a netgear router, and I have BT home hub. I can get to the hub manager, and portwarding and even advanced, but it does not show the same as the netger. Also people have said something about static and DDNS ips address?

recived letter today from their intructe solicitor saying they are going to defend it! Will speak to one of our legal bods at work for futher avice, but still think my evidence is better than 51%

They have. Firslty saying gps said they where not in area, also when i gave then job card said i was in a scamming opperation with person that gave me job card, also truck came back next day to see damage- if they where that convinced they did not hit why need to come back and see damage. They said they did not pick up broken down car on my road but did at diary, diary is my neighbur less than 50ft away. They also accused my neighbour of lieing that they saw truck in drive Just so many errors which i suspect the judge will see as bad reflection of their character an honesty what a hornets nest i have staired up.

Yes they did lie! They said they (which I have in an email) checked ALL their trucks GPS trackes and they where not in the area. This is a lie.

That has never crossed my mind!

I know times are tight, and you might have to cut back else where, but to turn down "free" money is wrong. Also remeber pension is taken off before tax, so you end up paying less tax/NI therfore your "loss" to the pension will be less than you think

SO it is money for nothing! So why not join it?

Does the compnay not have to put X% in as well? or is it basiclay a stake holder forced on you?

Yes we have all joked at work that when the next pesson goes on a 2 week hoilday, the day they leave we will put in small claims against them...just for a laugh! It all seams too simple! I will kepp you posted...fingers crosse!

I believe small claims is the other way round. They have to prove they did not do it. I only have to prove "on the balance of probability" that they did do it. As said, tracking data only says they where at XYZ locations, therefore they can not say they where not at location B i.e my drive/gates Yes I have been through their defence in my head and can not see how it is stronger than mine. I have been told the "court" is just a few people and to treat it like a job interview.

I have not got their insurance details, as firstly they drove off with out informing me. I do not have the evience that says "they did it 100%" hence why police could not charge them, but i do have very strong evidence that " on the balance of probablity" they did do, which is what you need for small claims I have been informed.i.e as long as your evidence is 51% V theirs at 49% (at worst case) The CCTV only proves that they turned around in drive (backed up by my witness), As far as I can see all the compnay can only say is they (their driver) did not hit the gates/pillars, and they have tracking data. But i have witness that seen them in drive (but not hit), damage is very specific and only this type of truck could have cause damage, yes they do have tracking data (which I have copy of) but it only shows them at XYZ etc locations as it only tracks every minute, so there is a 59 second gap of time. Plus my new cctv data which shows them turn in from left which means they did turn around otherwise it would have had to show them turn in from right. plus they orginaly denied been in area until I found out who had car recovered by them and they gave me job card. So on ballance of probablity, does the above look like it is in my favour?