Jump to content

pierre

Banned
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pierre

  1. The original question was answered long ago, but the matter of shooting foxes with an air rifle entered into the options.

    This is what gathered the most comments.

     

    Even if you kill a caged fox with an air rifle it can still be construed as causing "unecessary suffering" , as supported by the comments of two FO's.

    There was also an article in todays Daily Mail of a man who shot and killed a dog with an air rifle and was prosecuted for causing "unecessary suffering".

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10...ng-morning.html

    It appears that the law would make no distinction between a dog and a fox.

     

     

    But he shot it in the body so it took a few minetes to die, bignole was saying about shooting the fox straight in the head so it would die instantly

     

    Plus a dog is a pet a fox is vermin

  2. Well this thread has certainly taken off since i went for a walk...by the way,i just shot this with my Webley Vulcan x2,000,000 gls supa dupa air rifle..so there :lol:

    SS100326.jpg

     

    Wot,all of you are being silly...can,t i :rolleyes:

     

     

    Looks like you had some cleaning to do aswell

  3. And that about sums it up - you won't get past instinct I'm afraid, aggression is natural to these dogs and similar breeds, it was bred into them.

     

    Why do you think the low lifes have staffs and similar for some kind of protection? it's because they are so good at it, it comes naturally to them.

     

     

     

    So im a low life am i

  4.  

     

     

    Sorry i did'nt realise that staffys are the only dogs to ever attack anybody not all dogs are good what eva the breed

  5. At the end of the day Staffy's were bred for fighting and bull baiting :stupid: - in my mind that breeding has never gone away and I wouldn't trust one ever. :yes: In my mind they aren't any different to any of the other bull terrier breeds, and like has been said already; most owners seem to have them as an accessory to make them look 'hard' - but at the end of the day if they need a scary dog they aren't actually very 'hard' are they?! :good:

     

    Given the number of people who have been attacted, or their dogs attacted, by these animals I'm surprised they aren't controlled more and have to be muzzled at all times...going another step further with Martin's foam baseball bat analogy - I shudder to think about a kid in a pram at eye level with one of those animals when it turns nasty. :yes:

     

    The dog was bred for fighting and wounding - lovely pet...hmm....:good:

     

    still a long way from my original posting but every1 has their own point of view even if it is blind

  6. Look people, I said that it was down to the owners in my previous post, I just dont trust any staffordshire bull terrier now I dont want to take the risk of my dog being attacked by one again.

     

    Some people like them some people dont and I am the one who dont like them.

     

    All fine putting pictures up of them its not going to change the way people look at them.

     

    Mean look

     

    This is my dog who was attacked by a staffordshire bull terrier. Has it changed your mind on how you look at Staffordshire bull terriers now? I guess no.

     

    Staffordshire bull terriers will not be good in the field they were not bred to retrieve and bring back the quarry you want to shoot.

     

     

    looks like you just had bad luck anyway supose like most thigs it a topic like marmite i just wounderd if they would be good in the feild on as mine has nearly caught a few rabbits and they have a bit of terrier in them

     

    Sorry to hear that you have had bad experince's with staffys

  7. I dont want to offend anyone but our sport suffers from judgmental & intorerant people wanting us to confirm to their percived ideas of wrong and right,

     

    Its time we all realsised that different people like different things.

     

    Its easy to comment or even critersise on a forum without attacking people

     

    Harry you seam to infer Pierre's a macho fool who wants people to think hes hard..... at the same time you have a can of wupass as your sig, now you may have it for a differant reason but it gives the same impression, again you may be a great guy so i say this just to demonstrate how others may be intolatant towards you... which of course would be wrong

     

    This topic was about a bloke wanting to hear thoughts on his dogs suitability to do a job, I dont think for one minute he expected to take **** of people for his trouble....... I like most others like a good strong debate, but lets not make it personal.

     

    Ken

     

    ps i cant spell it doesn't embarrass me so dont bother

     

     

     

    Thank you my point exactly

  8. I wouldn't be proud of owning a dog that could not be trusted implicitly, and had the ability to inflict so much damage. Why should other people have to 'watch out'?

     

     

    if you came toward me giving it large he would have you but you walk over calmly then you aint got a problem the dog is doing wot it would do in the wild he feals that he is protecting his pack (family) it is simply in a dogs nature to do this so yes i am proud to own a dog that would protect me or my girlfriend

    she aint afraid to walk to a black alley with him as she know she is safe!!!

×
×
  • Create New...