Jump to content

Newbie to this

Members
  • Posts

    6,053
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Newbie to this

  1. No I mean like the failing Thames water, an company that has a contract, a contract that it seems, allows them to fail and the tax payer to bail them out. Whatever is in their contract for them to supply, I'm assuming infrastructure maintenance and improvement, is part of this contract. That cost money. Possibly, but it seems the Tax payer will be paying first, and won't see the money back. Surely this was known when they took on the contract..................... Absolutely, but investments are not a sure bet, they come with risk. The company has a contract, and the investors are not really investors, they are shareholders, and as such, responsible for the company and it's contracts. So your analogy doesn't really work. They have been awarded a contract and are not fulfilling it. They are not the aggrieved party. I assume you are talking about the staff's pensions. Again should not be the tax payer's responsibility. Thames water and their owner companies, should be on the hook. If they money is not there and has been embezzled, then criminal proceedings should be brought.
  2. I agree, but it's way too late for that nail. Labour/Starmer would be showing their hypocrisy, after Labour bailed out the banks with Tax payer's money. Either way
  3. The tax payer not funding a private company. Either another buyer can come in, buys the company at a much reduced price and put the money in required by their contract. Or it comes back into public ownership, without the Tax payer, paying Thames water for their failures.
  4. Like I said, either way the Tax payer is going to foot the bill. Best advice I have seen so far is, let them go bankrupt. Same should have happened in 2008.
  5. Better to let the BBC fund itself. If it is the bastion of truth and impartiality that some claim, then surley it will survive. I doubt it though.
  6. With the post offices knowledge (or it was portrayed that way).
  7. Don't worry the good old tax payer will come to the rescue. The best advice I've seen, is let them go bankrupt, and then take it back into public ownership. But I'll bet that our politicians do the complete opposite.
  8. I refer you to my previous statement....
  9. Yep I see it now 🤦‍♂️ I must learn to read English
  10. OK, I take it back. I didn't realise it was NI or that the proforma debacle was different.
  11. If it is about the FAC application, then it will be another Medical proforma, and the police should have insisted on the full medical records being reviewed last time for the SGC. They will not contact the doctor, and will insist on a new proforma.
  12. Well people will keep voting for the same old, same old.............
  13. Not long enough to be invector plus https://www.teaguechokes.com/browning-miroku-invector-plus-12g-flush
  14. Remington is not a bad shout https://www.teaguechokes.com/chokes/remington/remington-12g-flush
  15. Standard Invector chokes are not 51mm, https://www.teaguechokes.com/browning-miroku-invector-12g-flush
  16. Agreed. Our whole tax system needs overhauling. If there is one thing in life, that should be fair and equal, it is Taxation.
  17. If you have no luck, have a word with your local RFD that you use. I know mine would lend me a secondhand one if they had one in stock. They may charge a small fee depending how well you know them.
  18. Licence renewals can be done online.....
  19. All I can say is, who do they think they are, using my money to finance their eco wet dream. Our so called leaders need a wake up call. P45 in the post.
×
×
  • Create New...