Diss4111

Surely nobody from norfolk would waste diesel like that? get some Essex in you and siphon it from your neighbours truck 😂

So?

I use the .189 bush with an M4 screw through it. I load 22.5 grains with fibre wads and it gives good results. I guess a .180 would be the starting point

You need the scales set to measure grains. I had to modify my load all bushes to make them adjustable. This is basically a M4 screw drilled and tapped through the bush where the number is. You do need to cut a slot in the aluminium plate to allow it to slide. I can take photos of this and send to you if you need to do this. It allows you to fine tune the powder charge

I believe it is either .171 and .180. You will need to check it. You will get best performance from 22.5 grains. What wads are you using?

PM sent

Lakenheath used to be great, but then they ripped out all the trees and cover. The only issue I have ever had is they won't accept you had no birds unless you ring them when it happens. That said I do fancy a crack at floodlit skeet one evening

I'll put a few copies of this up at my local shoots

Abstract and absurd??? ROFLMFAO, I'm afraid you have the monopoly on that one duckie. I happen to be at work rather than being a layabout student. I have no need to prove myself to you. 30 plus years experience does that for me and i'm the only one that matters. So you are saying that nearly 100 bar escapes around the edges of a tightly fitted fibre wad, you are deluded. You are also working of a data sheet, not actual loads in the field. Not my issue if your chono is inferior and doesn't measure fibre loads. Try it 2.5m from the muzzle like the industry does.

It certainly seems that way doesn't it? Maybe they've been listening to your drivel too.

The fibre wad deforms at the point of firing and seals too, It is incredibly hard to push a fibre wad through a barrel where as it is easy to push a plastic wad through the seal you speak about is minimal difference with either. The muzzle blast affects either test which is why it is done at 2.5m from the muzzle

Sorry, Maybe its this post you are accusing me of ignoring? Not the case, just didn't see it true, actual recoil is governed by Newtons laws. However perceived recoil is something else. That is why a 32 gram steel load doing 1400 FPS seems to recoil harder than a 32 gram lead load doing the same speed. Why is this??????? It's because of the wad design and the compression section that the steel wad doesn't have. So nothing to do with the wad itself? I think it has a lot to do with the wad. In the same way B & P cases with the Gordon System have less recoil.

Why do you hate fibre?

Why don't you give up, your arguments have more holes than a collander and are based on some theoretical nonsense rather that the real world

Really? That's not my findings from reloading. Plastic loses energy compressing the piston section. With the exact same load a plastic wad is slower.

It would be one hell of a shot too

Also your medical records are exactly that, records. It's all history. No one (Except maybe Doris Stokes) knows if you will go crazy today, tomorrow or never. You can never expect a GP to say whether you are fit or not to hold firearms, that's the FEO's job.

His tombstone will say 'Replacement is the reverse of the removal' I've lost count of how many times I have read that in the manuals

Firstly a plastic wad will not drop down inside a case, It has to be pushed in and seated properly. Secondly a fibre wad needs less powder to maintain the same speed and pressure as it doesn't have a compression section like most plastic wads. This is why they perceive to recoil a bit harder. The only difference is the 2 part wad needed. And this could be sorted very easily. If or course they really wanted to.

Or they died of natural causes, they just happened to be over you when that happened

Sky isn't compulsory, and you pay for what you want, The beeb takes your money as you have no option and just sends you **** in return

The licence fee shouldn't exist anymore, every other TV company relies on advertising or subscriptions for its income. The BBC should be the same. Its simple, make decent programs that people want to watch and command decent prices for primetime advertising

I am well aware of physics. However shooting, and certainly shooting at any kind of distance requires a little more than physics. It requires the ability to centre the pattern in the correct place. Something very few people can do consistently. When you start splitting hairs over a couple of inches difference in lead at 40 yards between cartridges it is beyond physics. Unless of course you know every variable before pulling the trigger. And you cannot possibly know that, you are only going on what is says on the box for a speed reference. How about wind speed?, atmospheric pressure?, air temperature?, etc etc etc. The list of variables is endless,

I didn't call anyone I didn't agree with a liar, try reading posts properly. I read yours and it was drivel, sorry about that. But you know what they say? The truth hurts

I have been experimenting with this powder. i have had good results with 70mm case, Fiocchi 615 primer 4mm over powder card 38mm fibre shot cup 32 grams steel shot RTO