trakker01 Posted May 31, 2006 Report Share Posted May 31, 2006 On the 4th of July the United Nations will meet in New York to vote on a World wide ban of ownership of GUNS . This will mean you and myself will not be able to legally own a gun . Talk about losing our Rights . Check this out at the following link . http://www.STOPUNGUNBAN.ORG . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jonrms Posted May 31, 2006 Report Share Posted May 31, 2006 ***??:lol:?? There is no way possible this can happen......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnGalway Posted May 31, 2006 Report Share Posted May 31, 2006 (edited) . Edited September 4, 2009 by JohnGalway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPEEDY Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 Just remember we thought down here that it couldn’t happen to us, right up until they started taking our guns from us. Every time things like this happen it stirs up the antis so it’s up to all sporting shooters to get stirred up themselves. When the anti gun wagon comes trundling down your way 9and it will) start writing to your local and federal members and show your support to our sport or your going to wake up one morning with nothing but photos and memories of what was to hunt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlander Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 Yeh right...hows that gonna work??? I know we should keep a watchful eye on our rights but this has about as much of a chance at a yes vote as most of us have of shooting 500 pigeons in a day! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cranfield Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 Like most news items, it seems that this is partly true, but partly untrue, depends on what you read. The UN is trying to ban the personal ownership of assault weapons Worldwide. The also would like the US to come into line with countries like the UK, Canada, Australia, etc., where handgun ownership is also banned. On handguns they have a fall back situation, where they want them much tighter controlled by licensing and limited to one gun per person, if not completely banned. We have to remember there are a lot of civilians still wandering round the Balkans, the Middle East, Africa and quite a few other places, clutching their Kalashnikovs, I think these are the people they are trying to control. The NRA (great organisation) in the US exists by being vigilant and whipping up public frenzy every now and then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungler Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 Never gonna get guns off the Yanks. Right to bear arms in the constitution and all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNAKEBITE Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 You can get a group of people together and they can vote on what they like, doesn't make a difference if they haven't got the power to back it up! In keeping with the rhyming slang .......... they are havin' a giraffe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cranfield Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 Never gonna get guns off the Yanks. Right to bear arms in the constitution and all that. I agree that its almost impossible to imagine any Americans giving up their rights to own guns. Incidentally, there is a lot of debate about the true interpretation of, "the right to bear arms", as stated in the Constitution. The full phrase is "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". Many Constitutional experts believe this refers to a, "well regulated militia" having the right to keep and bear arms, not individual civilians. I suspect its one of those debates that will last for ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofh Posted June 2, 2006 Report Share Posted June 2, 2006 Never gonna get guns off the Yanks. Right to bear arms in the constitution and all that. I agree that its almost impossible to imagine any Americans giving up their rights to own guns. Incidentally, there is a lot of debate about the true interpretation of, "the right to bear arms", as stated in the Constitution. The full phrase is "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". Many Constitutional experts believe this refers to a, "well regulated militia" having the right to keep and bear arms, not individual civilians. I suspect its one of those debates that will last for ever. It's a tree huggers dream, but I doubt it will have any impact, after all guns make people a lot of money, especially the USA. Mind you I could see Tony and his lot trying to get an outright ban if he thought it would win him a few votes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velveteens Posted June 2, 2006 Report Share Posted June 2, 2006 Never gonna get guns off the Yanks. Right to bear arms in the constitution and all that. I agree that its almost impossible to imagine any Americans giving up their rights to own guns. Incidentally, there is a lot of debate about the true interpretation of, "the right to bear arms", as stated in the Constitution. The full phrase is "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". Many Constitutional experts believe this refers to a, "well regulated militia" having the right to keep and bear arms, not individual civilians. I suspect its one of those debates that will last for ever. It's a tree huggers dream, but I doubt it will have any impact, after all guns make people a lot of money, especially the USA. Mind you I could see Tony and his lot trying to get an outright ban if he thought it would win him a few votes Why is Oxfam involved in this. I thought they were do-gooders I only ever see them when they,re shaking a tin under my beak to rebuild a mud hut in Swaziland or something like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trakker01 Posted June 2, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2006 all these charity's are ripping ya,give em nowt!! if you could see their audits for the tax year ya'd think again.. i know a "help aged" guy ,who drives a sl55amg benz on company expencies, *******! do as they do in france, stand up for ya rights & have what your entitled to... im no,skivvy are you!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.