Jump to content

Texas shooting.


Dirty Harry
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wasn't such a good plan to attempt what they did in a state renowned for a huge number of armed citizens and at a function attended by large numbers of assault rifle toting police officers.

Good job by a single police officer for averting the terrorism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you believe the stupidity of the Yanks, having a competition for drawing cartoons of Mohamod? Almost like decoying pigeons. They just knew there would be a couple of radicals turn up - it could have gone the other way if they had a bomb in their car!

It's called free speech.

 

They draw the cartoons because they can and because it's a line in the sand. Imagine if there was a ruling or an unwritten rule for fear of violence that cartoons can't be drawn - what next the religion or any religious following can't be criticised?

 

Nice shooting from the traffic officer. As they say, practice makes perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had this happened in another country or possibly another state in the US there would have been a terrible loss of life. Look at the events in Paris and in Scandinavia (Brevik)

 

Not saying the American system of arming police is right for every country but in this instance their system (and the courage of a single cop) saved lives, probably lots of lives.

 

The policeman who followed the US police motto "to protect and serve" did just that. He should have his income tax cancelled for the rest of his life and of course a medal as big as a dinner plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good shooting. :yes:

 

Just goes to show, the death penalty doesn't need to be an expensive process for the taxpayer. :good:

:good::lol:

 

It's called free speech.

 

They draw the cartoons because they can and because it's a line in the sand. Imagine if there was a ruling or an unwritten rule for fear of violence that cartoons can't be drawn - what next the religion or any religious following can't be criticised?

 

Nice shooting from the traffic officer. As they say, practice makes perfect.

:good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's called free speech.

 

They draw the cartoons because they can and because it's a line in the sand. Imagine if there was a ruling or an unwritten rule for fear of violence that cartoons can't be drawn - what next the religion or any religious following can't be criticised?

 

Nice shooting from the traffic officer. As they say, practice makes perfect.

Why would anyone go out of their way to provoke trouble when they don't have to? Thats not free speech that just deliberately setting out to cause trouble for the sake of it. The whole thing was Muslim baiting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you believe the stupidity of the Yanks, having a competition for drawing cartoons of Mohamod? Almost like decoying pigeons. They just knew there would be a couple of radicals turn up - it could have gone the other way if they had a bomb in their car!

And can you believe the stupidity of the Brits to allow the life of Brian to be aired, describing Christ as a naughty boy,almost like decoying pigeons, they just knew Christians would react, and react they did they laughed their heads off, rather than popping down the local flicks to behead the projectionist and massacre the audience.

 

KW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And can you believe the stupidity of the Brits to allow the life of Brian to be aired, describing Christ as a naughty boy,almost like decoying pigeons, they just knew Christians would react, and react they did they laughed their heads off, rather than popping down the local flicks to behead the projectionist and massacre the audience.

 

KW

Indeed, satire is a huge part of western culture. Different if the target of our satirical observation were always one area, then it would be persecution, but if everything else is fair game then so is holy Mo (PBUH).

Edited by grrclark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's called free speech.

 

They draw the cartoons because they can and because it's a line in the sand. Imagine if there was a ruling or an unwritten rule for fear of violence that cartoons can't be drawn - what next the religion or any religious following can't be criticised?

 

Nice shooting from the traffic officer. As they say, practice makes perfect.

:good: Totally agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And can you believe the stupidity of the Brits to allow the life of Brian to be aired, describing Christ as a naughty boy,almost like decoying pigeons, they just knew Christians would react, and react they did they laughed their heads off, rather than popping down the local flicks to behead the projectionist and massacre the audience.

 

KW

 

Excellent :lol:

 

Fundamentalism rarely has a sense of humour.

 

It's very easy to consider yourself generally against the police being armed (and many people do, maybe myself included at times), but if I was looking down the wrong end of an AK-47 I would quite like it if the local Bobby could cap the bad guy before he had a chance to massacre me and my entire family. Food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would anyone go out of their way to provoke trouble when they don't have to? Thats not free speech that just deliberately setting out to cause trouble for the sake of it. The whole thing was Muslim baiting

 

Your dead right its baiting how awful to offend those who are easily offended,

 

We lost some 12 people in an attack in France recently to those who are easily offended, they were offended by those who mean to offend and poke fun at all, (that means everybody) its called satire, if you believe what you say in your response, rather than spout the expected schooled mantra of we must not offend, then why are you not boarding a ferry at Dover now and storming France? over this offensive image that those nasty callous cartoonists portray of us, including you and yours as surely its the same thing? answers on a postcard why not please.

 

CharlieHebdo_zpso7u65hzj.jpg

Edited by kdubya
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would anyone go out of their way to provoke trouble when they don't have to? Thats not free speech that just deliberately setting out to cause trouble for the sake of it. The whole thing was Muslim baiting

 

I think KW has nailed it.

 

However, it's not Muslim baiting, because your average Muslim won't want to murder anyone over a drawing.

 

I rather liked the film Four Lions - is that a film that shouldn't have been made for fear of causing offence? What about the Life of Brian? What about Father Ted?

 

Where do these lines get drawn? Oh hang on, they are drawn in law - the law says cartoon are legal and shooting cartoonist is murder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think KW has nailed it.

 

However, it's not Muslim baiting, because your average Muslim won't want to murder anyone over a drawing.

 

I rather liked the film Four Lions - is that a film that shouldn't have been made for fear of causing offence? What about the Life of Brian? What about Father Ted?

 

Where do these lines get drawn? Oh hang on, they are drawn in law - the law says cartoon are legal and shooting cartoonist is murder.

Apparently the pope threatened to cut Dave Allens finger off! ooh maybe he did.

 

 

KW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote,

(Will he now be suspended pending investigation?

 

NO, this didn't happen in England. Other countries have more common sense).

 

It would be an issue in England, because if there was a surprise attack shopping mall etc. The police would have to stand by and watch as civilians were murdered, while waiting for armed response.

Edited by ordnance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote,

(Will he now be suspended pending investigation?

 

NO, this didn't happen in England. Other countries have more common sense).

 

It would be an issue in England, because if there was a surprise attack shopping mall etc. The police would have to stand by and watch as civilians were murdered, while waiting for armed response.

The police would have to get to the mall first,even if you arm all police you cannot stop someone walking into a crowded place and pulling a trigger.

The american police knew there was a danger and had the place surrounded with lots of security.

 

Well done to the officer involved,takes big cojones to face up to men armed with rifles when all you have is a pistol,and to shoot both is incredible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...