Jump to content

Queensferry Crossing


Stonepark
 Share

Recommended Posts

So it's open now then. I saw it when I was up that way in July on the way to the NW highlands.

Open for one day, then closed until the weekend, when folk chosen from a lottery draw get to walk over it

Official opening by the Queen next week, then it's there for 120 years (allegedly)

 

Way over budget & late on delivery = so another triumph for Nikola

 

ETA:

On such topics, the enquiry into the fiasco that is/was the new Edinburgh Trams network has not yet finished looking at the issues involved, and the plans have been announced that the extension to Leith (originally included in the main tramway network plans, partly built, then abandoned) IS to go ahead!!

They reckon it will be about 3 to 5 years & turn the main Leith Walk road into a single carriageway for the duration!

 

How to win friends & influence people!!

Edited by saddler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Open for one day, then closed until the weekend, when folk chosen from a lottery draw get to walk over it

Official opening by the Queen next week, then it's there for 120 years (allegedly)

 

Way over budget & late on delivery = so another triumph for Nikola

 

ETA:

On such topics, the enquiry into the fiasco that is/was the new Edinburgh Trams network has not yet finished looking at the issues involved, and the plans have been announced that the extension to Leith (originally included in the main tramway network plans, partly built, then abandoned) IS to go ahead!!

They reckon it will be about 3 to 5 years & turn the main Leith Walk road into a single carriageway for the duration!

 

How to win friends & influence people!!

 

 

Leith brings back memories Worked there in the early seventies .... It was like the Barbary coast... I Could write a book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Way over budget & late on delivery = so another triumph for Nikola

 

 

 

Actually the new bridge came in at £245 million under budget. The delay was purely down to the adverse weather conditions out in the Firth of Forth.

 

The new bridge should be celebrated for what it is, a phenomenal feat of engineering. It looks absolutely magnificent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Open for one day, then closed until the weekend, when folk chosen from a lottery draw get to walk over it

Official opening by the Queen next week, then it's there for 120 years (allegedly)

 

Way over budget & late on delivery = so another triumph for Nikola

 

ETA:

On such topics, the enquiry into the fiasco that is/was the new Edinburgh Trams network has not yet finished looking at the issues involved, and the plans have been announced that the extension to Leith (originally included in the main tramway network plans, partly built, then abandoned) IS to go ahead!!

They reckon it will be about 3 to 5 years & turn the main Leith Walk road into a single carriageway for the duration!

 

How to win friends & influence people!!

Slightly off topic but I am in Edinburgh today and will be getting on a tram in an hour to go to the airport. How the mighty have fallen. When employed I would have got a cab and expensed it. Now running my own company it's whatever is the cheapest!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Way over budget & late on delivery = so another triumph for Nikola

 

 

 

Actually the new bridge came in at £245 million under budget. The delay was purely down to the adverse weather conditions out in the Firth of Forth.

 

The new bridge should be celebrated for what it is, a phenomenal feat of engineering. It looks absolutely magnificent.

 

Apologies....must have misheard the news earlier

 

Was the £245M saving before or after the £1.3BN final total?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saddler Posted Yesterday, 06:26 PM

BBC TV News are stating the opening day of the bridge has been plagued with tailbacks & delay chaos.

The full article has not been on yet, but very strange that the preview clip showed the 40 mph signs still in place!

 

And they will do for a short proving period and then will go up to 70 mph - hope it isn't too long eh?

 

Pushkin :yahoo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Apologies....must have misheard the news earlier

 

Was the £245M saving before or after the £1.3BN final total?

 

 

£1.3BN was the cost, which was £245M less than the original £1.55BN budget estimate. It is likely that the savings were for the best part the budget contingency but that contingency is unlikely to have been as high as 18%, 10% seems more likely so yes, I'd say this is a real saving likely in the region of £115M (the remaining £130M being the contingency. So there's a bit of self appointed positive PR spin on the headline saving but I'm minded to forgive them.

 

 

40mph signs in place and rising by increment up to 70mph to condition motorists to the layout, regular commuters having been restricted to 40mph for the last few years.

 

Delays and tailbacks, the crossing experienced much higher than average traffic all day yesterday, according to the radio traffic reports, apparently people were traveling from as far afield as the English midlands, to cross it on it's opening day and there were reports of traffic slowing to take in the view. There were al;so the usual breakdowns.

 

In the next few weeks the novelty'll wear off and things will speed up to full motorway norms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new bridge was way busier at 6am yesterday and when i got back at 10pm was still going strong.

 

A lot of the problem was extra people wanting to cross it for novelty value and then circling around to do it in the other direction, sometimes many times.

 

The sightseeing traffic became a huge issues as they came off the bridge and around the roundabouts at either end and that started to cause tailbacks on the arterial feeder routes onto the bridgeheads.

 

The main through traffic before and after the bridge was then doubled up on the bridge itself as not enough people were leaving the bridge system as they kept going around.

 

The cars flying the saltires and honking horns was a bit pathetic, sadly the new bridge has been appropriated as something of a trophy by the nationalists.

 

I confess that I struggle to understand the desire to drive over the bridge on day 1 being so great to make a special pilgramage. It's not particularly exciting to drive over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cars flying the saltires and honking horns was a bit pathetic, sadly the new bridge has been appropriated as something of a trophy by the nationalists.

 

I confess that I struggle to understand the desire to drive over the bridge on day 1 being so great to make a special pilgramage. It's not particularly exciting to drive over.

...yeah, but you were doing it sober!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not the SNP bridge, it's the bridge Labour didn't want. Tories identified the requirement and wanted to build it under PFI in 1995, Labour objected on the grounds that it opposed PFI and under pressure from their labour mates in Edinburgh council who wanted the money for the trams. When Labour came to office in 1997, they booted it into the long grass. Early naughties corrosion problems on the existing bridge were identified but the lib lab coalition still didn't bite.

 

Love them or hate them the Nats bit the bullet and started the ball rolling in 2007, first spade hit the ground in 2011.

 

I've heard it called a vanity project, I've heard it said it's unneeded. I've also heard it said that the sum to build it; could keep the Scottish public in big organic hand made willow wicker baskets, to adorn the front of our green solar power assisted butchers bikes. Those people obviously don't get out much... :no:

 

 

My priorities would be the A9 duelling and A82 upgrades, but it's all academic without a bridge crossing the forth, or the M74 extension to the western M8 without having to drive to Stirling or the M8/M73 junction connecting me south.

 

In my view this bridge wasn't just needed, it was needed desperately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye Labour would not fund it, but the only "politician" interviewed by the Bad Broadcasting Company was Gordon Brown.

He who refused funding in the first place. Go figure.

But do something else might have involved giving some credit to the SNP Government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the important point here is that the new bridge was bought and paid for by the Scottish Government. It has been delivered considerably under budget unlike the Edinburgh trams. It is an essential part of our infrustructure. What is there not to like?

 

 

^ Exactly. Where's the like button? :good:

Edited by Uilleachan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A badly much needed road to the highlands only slightly late due to weather they allowed 15 days to take the crane down off the north tower and due to the wind it took 65 days , well under budget and the wind wont affect it so it should never close any breakdowns etc should be put on the hard shoulder and allow the traffic to continue crossing .And although it was his area Brown wasnt for it

 

but Alex salmon started the ball rolling in fact .He was only first minister for less than a month and he dropped the tolls on the old bridge , The delays on the first day where put down to a extra 10,000 folk crossing it thats the bit i cant believe Anoraks getting up at 2 am to cross it or folk causing folk trying to get to there work a hours plus delay to go back and forward over the bridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the important point here is that the new bridge was bought and paid for by the Scottish Government.

 

Was it really? Scotland's deficit is running at a Greek-style 9 per cent of GDP (or 8.5 per cent if you include geographic share of North Sea Oil). This compares with 2.4 per cent for the UK. The fact is that England (more specifically London and the South East) is underwriting public spending in Scotland.

 

(Great engineering feat, nonetheless).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was it really? Scotland's deficit is running at a Greek-style 9 per cent of GDP (or 8.5 per cent if you include geographic share of North Sea Oil). This compares with 2.4 per cent for the UK. The fact is that England (more specifically London and the South East) is underwriting public spending in Scotland.

 

(Great engineering feat, nonetheless).

 

It has long been acknowledged that there are two distinct economies at work in the UK. The prosperous London and South East economy has gone from strength to strength largely down to the financial sector and preferential investment by the UK Government. Then there is the rest of the UK. You are right when say that London and the SE is underwriting much of the public spending in Scotland. What you failed to mention is that the rest of the UK also treat London as a cash cow. This distribution of wealth across the UK is only possible if the London economy stays strong. It will be interesting to see what happens to the London economy, with it's great reliance on the banking and finance sector, post Brexit. If the London economy flounders then the entire UK will be in dire straights financially. It is a wonder that London and the South East has not declared a Unilateral Declaration of Independence from the rest of the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...