Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
spandit

To FAC or not to FAC

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Walker570 said:

Many thanks. Was not doubting one bit that you had done the work on it. Soooo, it is the make up of the pellet and it's design which dictates penetration. I shoot Barnes TTSX all copper bullets in my 375JDJ and 8x57 and 257 RRI Wildcat and those bullets penetrate much better than 'normal' bullets.  SOOOOOOOOO ????  a)  FAC 177 or 22 b) what pellet ????

Short compact rifle choice ...sensible price ????????????????????????????

It depends on your desired power energy output really. .177 is a good cal up to about 20ft/lb. The problem with the .177 pellet is that in order to generate that kind of energy, the pellet's got to be going at a fair old lick and the lightweight pellets just can't maintain their accuracy at speeds much beyond the 900fps mark (speed of sound's 1100fps). A heavier pellet travelling slower will give better accuracy at higher energy levels, so if you want anything over that 20ft/lb mark, .22 or even .25 would be the cals to look at. 

In terms of pellet, your classic domed shape is still the best, after that it's about whatever suits your gun. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hello, while rapids are good air rifles and easy to maintain, if i were going FAC a 22 bsa R10 (28 ft llb)  plus find a S/H air bottle larger the better, if you dont mind something heavier a bsa super ten,like on guntrader somerset ad 20 plus ft llb

Edited by oldypigeonpopper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok short .light. and compact ..

Well a bullpup is the obvious  answer to that .and the fx wildcat fullfills that in spades. Energy up to 50 fpe in .25 

30 in .22 .

But if you want a rifle not a pup .

Then a bsa ultra is hard to beat in my opinion  .i know i sound like a broken record reccomending bsa s .

But they are well made easy to tune and have loads of backup by aftermarket and bsa themselves ..

My  22 ultra does 30 shots at 23 fpe (13 .4grn falcons ) with a longer scorpion tube fitted. This keeps it the same length as standard ultra and still feels light ..

Accuracy is good out to 70 yds which is plenty for most birds and rabbits .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Ultrastu said:

Ok short .light. and compact ..

Well a bullpup is the obvious  answer to that .and the fx wildcat fullfills that in spades. Energy up to 50 fpe in .25 

30 in .22 .

But if you want a rifle not a pup .

Then a bsa ultra is hard to beat in my opinion  .i know i sound like a broken record reccomending bsa s .

But they are well made easy to tune and have loads of backup by aftermarket and bsa themselves ..

My  22 ultra does 30 shots at 23 fpe (13 .4grn falcons ) with a longer scorpion tube fitted. This keeps it the same length as standard ultra and still feels light ..

Accuracy is good out to 70 yds which is plenty for most birds and rabbits .

you've just reminded me stu, falcon pellets, i recently bought a 3/4 full tin and some Crossman hollow points to try out.

A lot of the falcons were slightly damaged on the skirts, I'm thinking this is because there so thin? Have you found this or am i just unlucky?

could walkers S200 be converted to fac?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only references I could find regarding poor HW100 .22 performance in FAC go back to 2011. Have found youtube footage of much more recent dates showing it to be a very good and accurate rifle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The S200 I have could be but all the advice I have had is it is not a good idea.  No , if I go FAC it will bethe real deal. May sell one of my others, doubtful it would be the TX200.

1 hour ago, Mice! said:

you've just reminded me stu, falcon pellets, i recently bought a 3/4 full tin and some Crossman hollow points to try out.

A lot of the falcons were slightly damaged on the skirts, I'm thinking this is because there so thin? Have you found this or am i just unlucky?

could walkers S200 be converted to fac?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Walker570 said:

The S200 I have could be but all the advice I have had is it is not a good idea.  No , if I go FAC it will bethe real deal. May sell one of my others, doubtful it would be the TX200.

 

I was thinking you already have the gun and pump, know its sound, you don't need a large shot count do you? Obviously your going to get less shots because there is more air being used, unless you go down the R10 HW or rapid route, or fancy bullpup

From what I've read you need to be careful not to buy something someone has messed about with, power may be good at 22-30 ft/lbs but the rifle may shoot like a blunderbuss. 

All obvious i know but stu has said before about getting a good scorpion at 12 ft/lbs and convert it, plenty of folk have air arms 410 & 510 in fac but I've no idea of the length of those 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to fac my wolverine in .177 as I recently sold my 22lr. Finally decided to put a variation in for 22 lr . Might end up having both in the future but as has already been said the rimfire is probably cheaper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CHOICES CHOICES repeat for ever:good:

The S200 I have is the early two piece wood stock model and shoots very well indeed. It has the little 'screw' on the side of the action which I am told ismlinked to upgrading. As said to mess about might ruin what is at the moment a cracking little rifle.  I shoot almost always from relatively small purpose built cabins or pop ups and a rifle longer than the S200 is a pain to move around, even the TX200 HV with a mod on is on the limit.   The bullpups therefor look inviting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Scully said:

The only references I could find regarding poor HW100 .22 performance in FAC go back to 2011. Have found youtube footage of much more recent dates showing it to be a very good and accurate rifle. 

hello, it is a very good air rifle scully and well engineered, but i think with  FAC it pays to have the bottle type for more shots per fill rather than tubed unless you realy only shoot a few pellets each time out,  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, oldypigeonpopper said:

hello, it is a very good air rifle scully and well engineered, but i think with  FAC it pays to have the bottle type for more shots per fill rather than tubed unless you realy only shoot a few pellets each time out,  

Many thanks. ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, oldypigeonpopper said:

hello, it is a very good air rifle scully and well engineered, but i think with  FAC it pays to have the bottle type for more shots per fill rather than tubed unless you realy only shoot a few pellets each time out,  

Wise words. 

My Wolverine does 40 good shots at 45 ft lbs in .25 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Walker570 said:

CHOICES CHOICES repeat for ever:good:

The S200 I have is the early two piece wood stock model and shoots very well indeed. It has the little 'screw' on the side of the action which I am told ismlinked to upgrading. As said to mess about might ruin what is at the moment a cracking little rifle.  I shoot almost always from relatively small purpose built cabins or pop ups and a rifle longer than the S200 is a pain to move around, even the TX200 HV with a mod on is on the limit.   The bullpups therefor look inviting.

Which bullpups take your eye? .walker .

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Walker570 said:

All of them:lol:  No, the only one I have handled in the shop is the BSA with the laminate stock. Very handy.

Don't tell him that he loathes that gun, tin hat on. 

how is the project coming stu?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hah .cheers mice .

The bsa is ok i suppose .its just not what i wanted bsa to make after years of bugging them to do a bull pup .

Its over piced and too heavy  and for 50 quid less you can get an fx wildcat . 

So why would anyone  get the bsa over the fx ?????? .

The project is going slow ive had a lot on recently and just back from hols . 

But got some mounts for it this week so gonna cut  the stock in i few weeks .

IMG_20180816_184447.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This could (but wont ) be converted to fac .In 177 with bis mags (it likes em ) i recon it would do around. 25 shots at 17 fpe .

This would give a flat trajectory and a 40 -45 yd zero .

With exact 8.4 grn it could do 30 shots at 15.5 fpe .

Or 35 shots with falcons at 14.5 fpe .

These dont sound like big numbers in power .but you have to remember they are all around 900 fps.. same as a .25 cal at 45 fpe .so the trajectory would be the same. Its just the impact would be less .

But believe me if you hit a rabbit in the head with a falcon acc at 14 fpe and a .25 cal a 40 fpe .its equally as dead with both 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart from the weight then what don't you like about it?

 

(If your going to poke a bear etc etc.....:yahoo:)

Edited by Walker570

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Walker570 said:

Apart from the weight then what don't you like about it?

 

(If your going to poke a bear etc etc.....:yahoo:)

ha ha i am naughty ??

I saw an air arms bull pup for sale a while ago that looked very smart galahad? I'm googling it now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Ultrastu said:

Dont get me started .

Ive posted before my opinions on the defiant .i cant be bothered to revisit it now .

 

???????????

we defiantly have him rattled now

??????????? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the look and concept of the Kral Puncher NP02 - for £350 it seems like a bargain. Could always just buy one and get it up rated to FAC should I need to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...