Jump to content

Grenfell Tower Bonfire Video


Mungler
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

It's not bad taste, it's filming and mocking people/children and animals that were burnt alive in a horrific fire. That's not free speech, it's utter disrespect and evil. To go through the effort of building a tower with the intention to show off and take the **** on unfortunate families? Yeah that's a crime in my book. I have two good mates both fireman. One that was on duty on the night and went into Grenfell who nearly lost his life and the other on the clean up Op in the morning, both have been seriously affected by the event and to have these ***** come up with this and film it is just beyond belief. Plus they had kids at the party???? ***, and we wonder why we have teenagers in today's thinking they can do as they please, well it's parenting like this that produces such individuals.

Edited by Whatmuff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Whatmuff said:

It's not bad taste, it's filming and mocking people/children and animals that were burnt alive in a horrific fire. That's not free speech, it's utter disrespect and evil. To go through the effort of building a tower with the intention to show off and take the **** on unfortunate families? Yeah that's a crime in my book. I have two good mates both fireman. One that was on duty on the night and went into Grenfell who nearly lost his life and the other on the clean up Op in the morning, both have been seriously affected by the event and to have these ***** come up with this and film it is just beyond belief. Plus they had kids at the party???? ***, and we wonder why we have teenagers in today's thinking they can do as they please, well it's parenting like this that produces such individuals.

Cant argue with that , but ...
Is it a criminal offence ?

The people concerned have 'handed themselves in'  have they been arrested, charged ?
If so ,Id like to know what with.
Im NOT sticking up for them, but no matter how distasteful or 'evil' people think it , are we now setting a precedent where we have to be careful what we destroy, lest we offend someone ?
How many Union Jacks have been burnt by ISIS supporters in this country, how many pictures of the queen, or other leading figures ?
Is it a hate crime every time someone demonstrates hate ?
Because if it is , were going to need a lot more police, and a lot more prisons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Rewulf said:

Cant argue with that , but ...
Is it a criminal offence ?

The people concerned have 'handed themselves in'  have they been arrested, charged ?
If so ,Id like to know what with.
Im NOT sticking up for them, but no matter how distasteful or 'evil' people think it , are we now setting a precedent where we have to be careful what we destroy, lest we offend someone ?
How many Union Jacks have been burnt by ISIS supporters in this country, how many pictures of the queen, or other leading figures ?
Is it a hate crime every time someone demonstrates hate ?
Because if it is , were going to need a lot more police, and a lot more prisons.

Exactly. Point was made on the radio that burning Guy Fawkes could be seen as a hate crime against Catholics. We need to be careful where we go with this stuff however distasteful. If it was posted on the net for others to see then maybe there is a crime there if designed to shock and offend? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oowee said:

Exactly. Point was made on the radio that burning Guy Fawkes could be seen as a hate crime against Catholics. We need to be careful where we go with this stuff however distasteful. If it was posted on the net for others to see then maybe there is a crime there if designed to shock and offend? 

Would anyone be able to prove that?

As I have stated previously it is not illegal to be stupid!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should not be a crime, at all. It is a massive dig at free speech. It is absurd that we attempt to police people's scumbag humour, nobody likes these people, without doubt they are ****, but where do you draw the line at legislating offensiveness?

 

EDIT: Apologies for the need for edit! Didn't know that level of censoring words was required, I'll keep it in mind.

Edited by DanBettin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oowee said:

I guess it depends on where and how it was posted. If they posted it on the Grenfell facebook page (i guess there is one? ) then I would imagine there is a case to be made.

I agree with you in principle, but I would imagine there have been many offensive comments made about the minority victims of Grenfell, maybe on their FB page and elsewhere  since it happened.
There could well be comments on the Youtube video that are offensive ?
But are we going to chase down every single one of them and prosecute, and if so , for what ?

I dont believe you have to be directly involved in Grenfell to be offended by this, so if you have watched the video and been appalled , traumatised or indeed offended, then has a crime been committed against you ?
Has public decency been outraged ?
Its all well and good that people are outraged about the callous nature of these morons, but we have to be very careful where this ends up.
If every time you get upset or offended by something, you feel its a reportable crime, then like I say, we are going to need a justice system the likes of which we most definitely cant afford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rewulf said:

I agree with you in principle, but I would imagine there have been many offensive comments made about the minority victims of Grenfell, maybe on their FB page and elsewhere  since it happened.
There could well be comments on the Youtube video that are offensive ?
But are we going to chase down every single one of them and prosecute, and if so , for what ?

I dont believe you have to be directly involved in Grenfell to be offended by this, so if you have watched the video and been appalled , traumatised or indeed offended, then has a crime been committed against you ?
Has public decency been outraged ?
Its all well and good that people are outraged about the callous nature of these morons, but we have to be very careful where this ends up.
If every time you get upset or offended by something, you feel its a reportable crime, then like I say, we are going to need a justice system the likes of which we most definitely cant afford.

Quite possibly but as you say where will all this "I'm offended" state of mind end?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TIGHTCHOKE said:

Quite possibly but as you say where will all this "I'm offended" state of mind end?

Its already a runaway train in my opinion mate.
But it costs time and money to investigate, and ties up services that are far more important.

Burglary and crimes of violence barely get any attention, or god forbid, solved.
Yet many force areas have a 'zero tolerance'  policy on hate crime ?
And then complain they have no money, not enough staff ?

Your car or house gets broken into , and thousands of pounds of property are stolen or damaged, you get a crime number and a promise of a visit days later.
Someone gets called a racist or homophobic name and the cavalry turn up and the gears of justice clank into life.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad taste? Yes. Stupid? Yes. A crime? No.

It didn't even look like Grenfell. It was a cardboard box with Grenfell written on it. The fact everyone needs to video and post every aspect of their lives is asking for trouble. 

Someone would be "outraged" by almost every video out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TIGHTCHOKE said:

Quite possibly but as you say where will all this "I'm offended" state of mind end?

I think it goes far beyond the state of mind stuff. With the internet everything we do and everything we think becomes so much more visible. It's difficult to avoid rational argument about so many things, be that causing offence to demonsrating hate, to hunting to fast cars to eating meat. It is that runaway train of doing right and good that is at the same time an infringement of liberty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, oowee said:

 It is that runaway train of doing right and good that is at the same time an infringement of liberty. 

Is that what its all about ?
Make it so that no one dare say or do anything that could be deemed offensive, keep their opinions to themselves and dont rock the boat ?
No protests, no thinking outside the box, lest they be considered 'extreme'
Voluntary totalitarianism, a police state for the mind, the ubiquitous virtual panopticon , self administered .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Rewulf said:

Is that what its all about ?
Make it so that no one dare say or do anything that could be deemed offensive, keep their opinions to themselves and dont rock the boat ?
No protests, no thinking outside the box, lest they be considered 'extreme'
Voluntary totalitarianism, a police state for the mind, the ubiquitous virtual panopticon , self administered .

It's pretty sad. I cant help thinking that those of us born in the 60's had the best of it all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oowee said:

It's pretty sad. I cant help thinking that those of us born in the 60's had the best of it all. 

Agreed, life was so much simpler then.
I have conversations with my daughters about the news, where they regularly tell me 'You cant say that !'  I say of course I can, its my opinion.
They have this strange idea (from school and uni) that voicing an opinion that isnt quite PC, in the privacy of your own home, amongst family or friends, is borderline illegal !
The thought police are coming...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Rewulf said:

Agreed, life was so much simpler then.
I have conversations with my daughters about the news, where they regularly tell me 'You cant say that !'  I say of course I can, its my opinion.
They have this strange idea (from school and uni) that voicing an opinion that isnt quite PC, in the privacy of your own home, amongst family or friends, is borderline illegal !
The thought police are coming...

The same as my two step kids.

Frightening that they don't realise what is happening to them, and won't except it when you try to explain it. I believe it's called indoctrination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I blame the likes of games like cards against humanity etc, its seems there is no need to bother with good old fashion wit these days, just the more offensive and outrageous you can be the more funny you are!!

Its interesting the public perception of such things, personally I think burning a model of Grenfell is disgusting and it wouldn't bother me if the participants were jailed for 10 years a piece, however on the contrary it appears perfectly acceptable for high profile comedians to make joke after joke about Madeline McCann, Princess Dianna, Jade Goody etc.

Interesting, not too far from me a local village built a bonfire a place a Union Flag on top of it. This has caused great outrage, if I didn't know a family member of one of the organisers I would probably be the same, I know the family are very nice, patriotic people and was not burning the flag out of protest and disrespect, and it just never appeared to them the sensitivity of such a act.   

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6353545/Disgusted-families-walk-Guy-Fawkes-night-event.html 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rewulf said:

How many Union Jacks have been burnt by ISIS supporters in this country, how many pictures of the queen, or other leading figures ?

A union jack is not a person, the queen is but she did not get burned/asphyxiated to death and then cruelly parodied by some eejits

 

58 minutes ago, Rewulf said:

Agreed, life was so much simpler then.

Yeah B&W minstrel show, Alf Garnett, Carry on..., Love thy neighbour, Benny Hill

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5z584iybkyo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Constantly stifling free speech can't change the way people think. IMO it can only go 1 of 2 ways. Either no-one ever says anything out loud about anyone and the government can rest contented that everything is tickedy-boo with the country,  or everyone will get sick to the back teeth of it and go completely the opposite way.

I know what my money's on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, henry d said:

A union jack is not a person, the queen is but she did not get burned/asphyxiated to death and then cruelly parodied by some eejits

 

Yeah B&W minstrel show, Alf Garnett, Carry on..., Love thy neighbour, Benny Hill

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5z584iybkyo

A flag represents a country, its people, disrespect the flag, you disrespect the people.
What the scumbags in the video have done is beneath contempt, the question is , is it illegal ?

 

To then talk about how bad the 60 s and 70s were because of shows like Alf Garnett and Love thy neighbour, is frankly a bit daft, times change and what was acceptable then, is not now.
Did people get offended and complain back then ?
Are you trying to say you didnt watch those programs back then and not find them entertaining ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...