Jump to content
gemini52

bsa airsporter s.

    Recommended Posts

    Thanks bruno22rf for clearing that up.The AirsporterS in .177 is mine as is the Theoben and there’s not much between them in age. The Airsporter S was bought in 1981 and the Theoben made just a few years later.

    ant.mass sorry but it’s the only rifle I’ll never sell for me it’s perfect,it was 13 years old when I bought it virtually unfired  from a collector for £250 probably late 1990s if you can find one I’d recommend you buy it I don’t think you’d regret it.

    dekers I just noticed your comment posh ****** if that was aimed at me ,I think you’ll agree I’m not such a posh ****** when I advise you in good old Glasgow vernacular to “ Get a life ya ****”

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    On 10/12/2018 at 18:22, Konor said:

    Dekers I just noticed your comment posh ****** if that was aimed at me ,I think you’ll agree I’m not such a posh ****** when I advise you in good old Glasgow vernacular to “ Get a life ya ****”

    Its pretty clear that he was paying your rifle a compliment.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Ok well I'm sure Dekers will clarify at some point.  Irrespective, it's against the terms of membership to abuse others so please don't.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    On 8 December 2018 at 18:43, Dekers said:

    Posh ******...….

    BSA1a.jpg.570b99036a1e373a748094c4f1829732.jpgBSAa.jpg.9872f9ac71732782370b112292f4d45e.jpg

    Mine from new in about 1970/71 I believe, and if memory serves me correctly still about 11.4ft lb when I last checked, gets very little use these days but can't bring myself to sell it! Oh yes, and a proper calibre .22! :lol::good:

    Zapp I'm surprised you didn't jump in earlier Nemo me impune lacessit

    Having seen your latest post Dekers my sincere apologies

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Oh ok.  That's because as I said it was clear it was not meant in a negative way, as has now been confirmed by Dekers.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Sorry Zapp but I don’t think it was clear at all two words open to interpretation one of which was asterisked out with no supporting sentence to put it in context 

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

    • Recently Browsing   0 members

      No registered users viewing this page.

    ×