Jump to content

Sale of goods-vehicles


eddoakley
 Share

Recommended Posts

Maybe should be in motoring section but here we go....

Bought a new van over a month ago.

Brand new from a large dealer.

Within a week it broke down. It didn't stop but warning lights on dash and AA called. Cleared faults (fuel pressure and communication errors, 4 codes in total)

All good.

Less than a week later and AA out again as it wouldn't start. This time 3 codes and "immobiliser fault" and " communication error".

Back to dealer who were liaising with Peugoet to try to resolve. Courtesy van supplied.

This morning I have told them that I am not prepared to have the van back due to the faults and it being clearly not fit for purpose. They have had it longer than I have!

My concern is not that I can't just send it back but that I had it sign written and racking fixed in the back. Where would I stand with A: seeking compensation for my costs?

B: returning a vehicle not in the same condition as I received it? 

C : having to remove sign writing etc?

Any advice?

 

Edd

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be seeking the cost of the sign writing as well - it's not your fault that the van is faulty. You could have returned it within 30 days I believe without question but over a month they may try and be difficult. Consumer direct will give you the best advice. (03454 040506)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TIGHTCHOKE said:

Well the vehicle is clearly "NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE" take it back request either a replacement or your money back and tell them you want your costs covered and will go legal if necessary!

quite................i know of 2 cases involving a land rover disco.........where after 4 mths of breaking down and rust issues on the side doors..........both parties made veiled threats of legal involvement and got a full refund..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I couldn't really have asked for more from the supplier.

Emailed this morning to say they could keep the van and I would have my money back. Sale of Goods, fit for purpose etc etc.

Had a call from the salesman who apologised for the slow response (2 hours!) but that the management had to discuss and agree it. He said I could have my money back, no arguments.

However they would like to make an offer that I was under no obligation to accept:- replacement vehicle, same spec, brand new off the forecourt (still in the wrapper) 19 plate instead of the 68 plate that I had, ply lined sign written  to my spec and 1 year tax. Not much to show for the inconvenience but I though a perfectly reasonable offer that I accepted.

So all in all I am satisfied and have to say the service I received from the supplier has been exceptional. 

David Spear Commercials in Tredegar.

 

Edd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...