turbo33 Posted May 7, 2019 Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 Have just come across this piece and in the Scottish Herald. Chris Packham is threatening to sue over the lies told about him in the article. His tweet and the article below. Where are the lies? Do I need to go to Spec Savers? https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/17620553.agenda-packham-campaign-gestures-are-for-the-birds/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good shot? Posted May 7, 2019 Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 I can only see this that he may disagree with. Chris Packham was previously investigated by the BBC Trust for referring to shooters as the “nasty brigade”. He also informed his significant Twitter following that shooting was the cause of the worrying decline in the lapwing population, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJsDad Posted May 7, 2019 Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 As Packham has previously accused `shooters` via his ramblings on Twitter for being the root cause of the reduction in the Lapwing population, I find his protest over this article as being a bit like the pot calling the kettle black. Packham is a very bitter and twisted individual who is very conservative with the truth when it suits his agenda. I hope The Scottish Herald stand by their article and say, fine Mr Packham; see you in court. He can pay his legal team with the proceeds of his `Woodcock` collectable that he currently has up for auction on eBay ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greylag Posted May 7, 2019 Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 I have nothing but contempt for the man.He is allowed to say as he wishes without comebacks.I have recently heard he is challenging Natural Resources Wales on their general licence.More fights ahead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbo33 Posted May 7, 2019 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Good shot? said: I can only see this that he may disagree with. Chris Packham was previously investigated by the BBC Trust for referring to shooters as the “nasty brigade”. He also informed his significant Twitter following that shooting was the cause of the worrying decline in the lapwing population, 38 minutes ago, JJsDad said: As Packham has previously accused `shooters` via his ramblings on Twitter for being the root cause of the reduction in the Lapwing population, I find his protest over this article as being a bit like the pot calling the kettle black. Packham is a very bitter and twisted individual who is very conservative with the truth when it suits his agenda. I hope The Scottish Herald stand by their article and say, fine Mr Packham; see you in court. He can pay his legal team with the proceeds of his `Woodcock` collectable that he currently has up for auction on eBay ! This will answer your points Good Shot...... https://raptorpersecutionscotland.wordpress.com/2017/01/30/more-nastiness-from-the-nasty-brigade/ https://twitter.com/ChrisGPackham/status/818166384823779328/photo/1 Edited May 7, 2019 by turbo33 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panoma1 Posted May 7, 2019 Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 Perhaps if Packham explained exactly what, in the article he is claiming are lies? If convinced, the Newspaper could then act accordingly? Or is it an attempt to garner public sympathy by claiming to be "the victim"? It will be interesting to see what comes of his threats! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbo33 Posted May 7, 2019 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 (edited) Personally, i feel he couldn't be digging a bigger hole for himself if he had access to an excavator! The biggest threat to him as a celebrity, his fame, and financial gain, and not least of which, is the wildlife in this country is his inability to control what he says! He has initiated both a financial and ecological catastrophe for rural England as a whole, and his absurd attempts to back out of his responsibility for this are, if it wasn't so serious, laughable. Edited May 7, 2019 by turbo33 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David.Evans Posted May 7, 2019 Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 Turbo your bang on right there this is unbelievable atb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultrastu Posted May 7, 2019 Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 Thats a fantasic artical in the paper . It really sums up who packham is and what he stands for . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mick miller Posted May 7, 2019 Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 I commented elsewhere that the irony of someone so mentally fragile that they would not be permitted to own a firearm, let alone use one being consulted over legislation that directly affects the lives and livelihoods of those that are and do, is not lost on me. If ever we needed evidence of the asylum being run by the inmates, this is it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbo33 Posted May 7, 2019 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2019 16 minutes ago, mick miller said: I commented elsewhere that the irony of someone so mentally fragile that they would not be permitted to own a firearm, let alone use one being consulted over legislation that directly affects the lives and livelihoods of those that are and do, is not lost on me. If ever we needed evidence of the asylum being run by the inmates, this is it. That Mick, is an extremely good point! There’s is a host of information out there that we have all been complacent about before, that would totally discredit him, and your point about firearms is absolutely correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.