Jump to content

The BBC Scraping The Free Over 75 License ???


marsh man
 Share

Recommended Posts

FWIW, I had the misfortune to see the Director General of the Biased Broadcaster spouting what programs would have to be cut if the continued to bear the cost of the oldies licences,

He should be either on stage or in parliament, the emotive dross spouted.

Never a mention of the disgracefully over inflated wage packets handed around like confetti. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 hours ago, scutt said:

I think we are being steered in the wrong direction to blame the gov .The management of the BBC is the elephant in the room. 

Correct.

The BBC spends money like water - overpaid 'stars', fancy sets, £1 Billion of a refurbish of their headquarters, £87 Million on a new set for Eastenders, £34 million on taxis, £1.7 million to Gary Lineker, £1.7 million to Chris Evans, 94 'managers' on over £150,000 a years each, £98 million on a 'Digital Media Initiative' that was never used and scrapped, £36 million on golden handshakes.  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7130127/British-Bloated-Corporation.html 

The thing about money is that if you don't have to work hard to earn it - you don't appreciate its value.  The BBC, who gets it's money 'spoon fed' by captive license payers splashes it about with no consideration about getting 'value' for what they spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, eddoakley said:

I'm  a little confused here (and with other references to the same thing)...

What is the cost of "funding free tv for over 75s"? 

They don't give them money, they just don't take it from them. Possibly something in admin but that's only the same as if they were charging so it's not a cost to the BBC, it's just less income and they get more than enough of that as it is.

I don't watch much tv at all and would happily never watch anything BBC again if it meant that the tax forced upon everyone could be scrapped.

 

Edd

Absolutely! The BBC decides how much money they want then applies their legal powers to extract it from the viewing public who have to either pay up or break the law. And it wasn't any different when the government stumped up a proportion of the levy. Whilst there is a legal framework for determining and administering the levy, the BBC itself is the relevant licensing authority which means that we all get royally screwed by them.

When I reach 75 I will most definitely not pay the levy and I might well stop sooner on principle. The only things we ever watch are available on catch up so I might even take down the aerial as well. And if the licensing nazis come after me they will be told which sunless part of their anatomy they can put their demand in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panoma1 said:

Apparantly the BBC purchased (if I heard correctly?)  37,000 copies of the Guardian newspaper last year! Purchasing a socialist, anti shooting rag with public money! Bias? What bias?

Put into perspective, that’s only 100 copies per day spread around all of their locations, be it ‘on location’ or studios and dressing rooms.- did they also acquire ‘other’ publications? 

What we must / should appreciate, is that just because we see the Guardian as a Socialist Antrim shooting paper- so do many others see it in the polar opposite, just because were ‘pro shooting/hunting’ , doesn’t mean the rest of the populace is!

Is it also “Public Money”, revenue generated from the BBC is not “Public Money” and they, like any other Government type establishment, able to purchase as they wish! Would you like every single business in the UK to only purchase one type of sandwich/ tea bag/ car/ paper clip/ bottled water/ desk ( oh the list goes on) - Welcome ‘Comrade’ 

Edited by Jaymo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panoma1 said:

Apparantly the BBC purchased (if I heard correctly?)  37,000 copies of the Guardian newspaper last year! Purchasing a socialist, anti shooting rag with public money! Bias? What bias?

Quote

First, the facts – as revealed in a freedom of information request: between 1 April 2010 and 28 February 2011, the BBC bought 59,829 copies of the Guardian compared with 51,384 copies of the Times and 48,968 copies of the Daily Telegraph. The Daily Mail came in fourth (45,553) and the Financial Times was eighth (33,721).

Something to temper the argument

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, stuartyboy said:

And that is the answer. 

To all who moan about the BBC, stop paying for the license and funding all that's wrong with it. 

My guess would be that most people (not all, but most) legally need a license; there is some information here https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/utilities/tv-licence/

I both watch real time and (occasionally) use iPlayer for catch up, so need (and have) a license.

Edited by JohnfromUK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jaymo said:

Put into perspective, that’s only 100 copies per day spread around all of their locations, be it ‘on location’ or studios and dressing rooms.- did they also acquire ‘other’ publications? 

What we must / should appreciate, is that just because we see the Guardian as a Socialist Antrim shooting paper- so do many others see it in the polar opposite, just because were ‘pro shooting/hunting’ , doesn’t mean the rest of the populace is!

Is it also “Public Money”, revenue generated from the BBC is not “Public Money” and they, like any other Government type establishment, able to purchase as they wish! Would you like every single business in the UK to only purchase one type of sandwich/ tea bag/ car/ paper clip/ bottled water/ desk ( oh the list goes on) - Welcome ‘Comrade’ 

Who's money pays the legally required licence fee to the BBC, If not the publics?......but perhaps publicly financed would have been a better expression?

And I could not imagine anyone seeing the Guardian as the "polar opposite" of a socialist, anti-shooting newspaper!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, panoma1 said:

Who's money pays the legally required licence fee to the BBC, If not the publics?......but perhaps publicly financed would have been a better expression?

And I could not imagine anyone seeing the Guardian as the "polar opposite" of a socialist, anti-shooting newspaper!

Check HenryD’s reply

Merely showing that you can make a statement to support an argument, but that argument only holds if ‘All’ the facts are utilised.

Much the same as ‘both’ sides of the Brexit argument 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, panoma1 said:

Who's money pays the legally required licence fee to the BBC, If not the publics?......but perhaps publicly financed would have been a better expression?

And I could not imagine anyone seeing the Guardian as the "polar opposite" of a socialist, anti-shooting newspaper!

 

3 minutes ago, Jaymo said:

Check HenryD’s reply

Merely showing that you can make a statement to support an argument, but that argument only holds if ‘All’ the facts are utilised.

Much the same as ‘both’ sides of the Brexit argument 

How does henryd's posting relate to the questions (directed to, but unanswered by yourself) asked in my posting......as quoted above? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, oldypigeonpopper said:

hello, BBC NEWS FLASH, BBC presenter Mr Ben Fogle has stated, i will give up a years salary to help the over 75s get a licence, what i could not find was how much ??????

He didn’t appear in the BBC list last year which would indicate that his “fee” for the Animal Park series is less than £150k - still very noble of him to do so though. 

Fortunately for Ben, this one series isn’t his only source of income.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jaymo said:

He didn’t appear in the BBC list last year which would indicate that his “fee” for the Animal Park series is less than £150k - still very noble of him to do so though. 

Fortunately for Ben, this one series isn’t his only source of income.  

hello, i wonder if any more high paid BBC presenters will follow his idea, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jaymo said:

He didn’t appear in the BBC list last year which would indicate that his “fee” for the Animal Park series is less than £150k - still very noble of him to do so though. 

Fortunately for Ben, this one series isn’t his only source of income.  

hello, he was just on SKY news, seems most sincere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...