islandgun Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 2 hours ago, panoma1 said: See Andy is “stepping back” from public life!......I wonder if he’s gonna step back from any future civil list money and perks he gets from the public purse? 🤔 Cant see him signing on, his mum's worth a few bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 Andy is clearly not bright enough to enter a world where someone questions what he says or does. The stupidity just drips from his lips and he thinks people will believe it - sheer arrogance. He would do well to stay away from any court or legal questioning, as any basic lawyer would rip his account to pieces. His best hope is to retire into relative obscurity, because this will not go away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 43 minutes ago, islandgun said: Cant see him signing on, his mum's worth a few bob he could always borrow a few quid off fergie...............either that or get a job suckin toes for sixpence a time....im sure fergie could show him the correct way....... christ this knocks brexit into a cocked hat....long may it continue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 50 minutes ago, islandgun said: Cant see him signing on, his mum's worth a few bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 On 19/11/2019 at 22:11, Fuddster said: Lad I used to work with served on a HMS in the Falklands conflict-he said Andy delivered the mail and supplies and was kept well away from danger. I wonder if Fergie will chip in or perhaps Koo? f. On 19/11/2019 at 22:16, Diver One said: My wife's friends husband was chief Artificer on HRHs ship....he said that if it was kicking off in the north then HRH was told to,fly south and hover until he started to get low on fuel,and then come back. I do not know how true this was, but... I was there too and it sounds much like the jack(dung) that gets flung around. He was on sea kings which were the big donkeys of the air arm and did drops of supplies and mail but they also provided chaff cover (attracting missiles) for air picket destroyers like the one I was on (HMS Glasgow) and the closer range frigates (Type 22's Broadsword etc) as well as the carrier group. Would I want to have been up there?? Probably not, I didn't want to be where I was! However like I said at the start, it sounds like jack(dung) where we denigrate others actions, I have two mates who have oak leaves as well as rosettes on their medals for being mentioned in dispatches; to the rest of our mess they just stuck their backsides in the hole where the ship's hull used to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scolopax Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 Just a press witch hunt. To me he did not do it, and what he did not do was not illegal anyway. All seems completely over blown to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB1 Posted November 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 41 minutes ago, scolopax said: Just a press witch hunt. To me he did not do it, and what he did not do was not illegal anyway. All seems completely over blown to me. Yeah, I can see how you could be convinced of that🥴 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saltings Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) 51 minutes ago, KB1 said: Yeah, I can see how you could be convinced of that🥴 guilty by association numerous events in said environment dooooooooh even blind the signs are there with a white stick , thick muppet types given that my wife wants to know what are minors doing at an adult party I suspect to forward their careers / lifestyle ?????? where are their parents doing to protect their under aged children more worrying I despair and shouldn't doubt all relevant info will be available to authorise ( social climbers ) if he is guilty the full weight of the law where the crime has been committed should come to bear ( prison ) regardless of social title Edited November 21, 2019 by Saltings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krugerandsmith Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 6 hours ago, scolopax said: Just a press witch hunt. To me he did not do it, and what he did not do was not illegal anyway. All seems completely over blown to me. Not in this Country but .... is in America. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norfolk dumpling Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 An old buddy of mine, a senior ranked copper, used to do Royal protection duties, and he said they were all lovely, respectful and grateful for the work the police di apart from one of them.................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penelope Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, norfolk dumpling said: An old buddy of mine, a senior ranked copper, used to do Royal protection duties, and he said they were all lovely, respectful and grateful for the work the police di apart from one of them.................. I wonder if being the 'spare' has any effect on his behaviour and outlook. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam triple Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) Thought we were innocent until proved guilty or is this no longer the case Edited November 21, 2019 by sam triple Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB1 Posted November 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 32 minutes ago, sam triple said: Thought we were innocent until proved guilty or is this no longer the case He may well be innocent of forcing himself on a under age girl, but he's definitely guilty of gross stupidity 🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam triple Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 35 minutes ago, KB1 said: He may well be innocent of forcing himself on a under age girl, but he's definitely guilty of gross stupidity 🙄 Yup not denying that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 46 minutes ago, KB1 said: He may well be innocent of forcing himself on a under age girl, but he's definitely guilty of gross stupidity 🙄 regardless of that ...........he is paid to represent OUR COUNTRY..and its values and place within this world....and he has never done that....and i think he has always failed in that objective............i think william and kate are doing a good job and im NOT a monachist so any carp that gets thrown at andrew true or false is well deserved Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam triple Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackbird Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 Maybe the time has come to have a referendum to abolish the monarchy??? I know which box my X would go in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boristhedog Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 8 minutes ago, blackbird said: Maybe the time has come to have a referendum to abolish the monarchy??? I know which box my X would go in. Just out of interest, would you replace the Monarch with something else? For example a President or Emperor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Bear Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 4 minutes ago, Boristhedog said: Just out of interest, would you replace the Monarch with something else? For example a President or Emperor. just imagine ------President B liar or president jerimiah corblimy --- the mind boggles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 hours ago, ditchman said: regardless of that ...........he is paid to represent OUR COUNTRY..and its values and place within this world....and he has never done that.... Except for the Falklands? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 24 minutes ago, henry d said: Except for the Falklands? 2mths in his 60 years dosnt give him free reign 53 minutes ago, Boristhedog said: Just out of interest, would you replace the Monarch with something else? For example a President or Emperor. do we have to have anything at all ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 hour ago, ditchman said: 2mths in his 60 years dosnt give him free reign... Does that also apply to everyone else who was there representing the country? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, henry d said: Does that also apply to everyone else who was there representing the country? ok ...so name me all the other folk who were there............who make me feel ashamed to be british when headlines like that are plastered all over the world i think you have been watching too many re-runs of Starship Troopers"...."Service garuntees citizenship"......so what you are intimating ..(as you were there)...is us mortals are of less value... its just been reported that his trip to Bahrain has just been cancelled.............(proberly because they didnt have enough time to lock up the goats) Edited November 21, 2019 by ditchman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipdog Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 hours ago, henry d said: Does that also apply to everyone else who was there representing the country? Yes it does. Ex service members deserve huge respect, but they do not get given the right to break laws or not have to work for the rest of their lives because of their time in service. Prince Andrew is no exception, in fact most when they leave have to undertake laborious work just to keep putting food on the table. All Andrew had to do was not hang around with pedophiles and reprobates!! Something he couldn’t manage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted November 22, 2019 Report Share Posted November 22, 2019 @ditchman If he`s guilty of anything then he should suffer the consequences, the problem I have is as soon as a high profile person hits the headlines someone starts the "There`s no smoke without fire!" routine and they get a good shoeing like this; 23 hours ago, norfolk dumpling said: An old buddy of mine, a senior ranked copper, used to do Royal protection duties, and he said they were all lovely, respectful and grateful for the work the police di apart from one of them.................. Quote I've worked with people that worked directly with him in protection roles. Not one of them ever had a good word to say about him. Neither did anyone they talked too that worked in the met. This seems to be echoed by almost everyone that's either worked or knows someone that worked alongside him. The bloke is clearly an #### of the highest order. So he`s not a nice person, neither are some who say; Quote sorry cant help myself muckraking But does that make him a paedophile or part of Epstein`s trafficking chums? Just poke the monkey with a stick, watch him dance, have a laugh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.