Jump to content

Lead ban & BASC


Recommended Posts

Cases can be collected and recycles easily, the wads are not so easy to collect.

I am very aware of the issues of  the limits of availability of steel outside of 10,12,and 20, an the smaller calibres tend to be bismuth, but of course rather costly! My point is, and perhaps not well explained, that the cartridge manufactures know as well as everyone else what's happening internationally and what's on the horizon. Now I am not in the cartridge business but I can predict they are working like the clappers to develop wad, shot and powder combinations that will keep them in business.

Enfield, I have already explained the difference between shooting over a clay ground (shot confined to a relatively small area and in some cases recovered too)  and shooting over fields etc (where the shot is deposited over a wider area into an environment where its not as easy to be recovered)  and of course there is also loads of scientific and peer reviewed research to back that up,  but back you come with sarcastic comments, which is rather disappointing. . But are you hinting that the orgs should look to ask for a voluntary ban of lead for clay shooting too? 

As I say, times are changing as we need to change too

 

Edited by David BASC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Quote

I think non lead is currently available in 10, 12, 20, 16 and 28 and I guess they have these in production because there is sufficient demand in the UK. What others are available outside the UK  I don't know, but I guess it will be easy enough to find out?

So you "think". You "don't know". But you "guess". But "thinking" and "don't knowing" and "guessing" that's good enough is it, sound enough is it, sensible enough is it to overnight overturn BASC's policy of "no evidence - no change"? Because if wishes were horses beggars would ride wouldn't they.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, David BASC said:

Oh please, as you honestly going to rip apart every post I make, just because I am using conversational English?  Well I guess I can expect that of you... not exactly helping the debate are you?

to be honest for someone screaming basc consulted with cartridge manufacturers basc does not have many answers for him do you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, David BASC said:

As I have said, what additional cartridges are available in non lead over the next 5 years will depend entirely on what the cartridge manufacturers can deliver, and I am sure they will focus on market demand. I think non lead is currently available in 10, 12, 20, 16 and 28 and I guess they have these in production because there is sufficient demand in the UK. What others are available outside the UK  I don't know, but I guess it will be easy enough to find out?

 

Ignorance is bliss, do you not think you should have done some home work first before making such a big decision at this time?

The uk cartridge manufactures have told you what they can deliver in one word IMPOSSIBLE ok a few foreign  cartridge manufacture may offer a few 12ga loads which comply ie non toxic shot and biodegradable wads so you are basically happy to see uk  cartridge manufacture go bust.  You have created a monopoly with no need for price competition so prices will be considerably more that a lead shot equivalent cartridge.

Edited by rbrowning2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When did I scream, or are you just making things up? What point are you trying to make that is relevant to this thread?

As I have said the cartridge manufacturers will supply cartridges based on demand, and based on the wad, shot powder combinations they have now and are developing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, David BASC said:

When did I scream, or are you just making things up? What point are you trying to make that is relevant to this thread?

As I have said the cartridge manufacturers will supply cartridges based on demand, and based on the wad, shot powder combinations they have now and are developing

i’m simply saying the cartridge manufacturers did not give you the answers you need maybe it’s time to call them onto the forum to explain their self it’s not much of a show they gave basc is it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, David BASC said:

When did I scream, or are you just making things up? What point are you trying to make that is relevant to this thread?

As I have said the cartridge manufacturers will supply cartridges based on demand, and based on the wad, shot powder combinations they have now and are developing

You are flying on a wing and a prayer, you have no idea if the technical challenges to produce biodegradable wads in any volume and any gauge other than 12 are even possible,  Because you never even thought to ask the wad manufactures that supply all the cartridge manufactures what they could deliver now or in the next five years did you?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David Ilsley (BASC) said:-

Arguing against steel shot is totally counterproductive.

Meanwhile, we see some stating a 'lets show how bad steel shot is' as a way of defending lead shot, sorry guys but that  will not work! But worst of all you now start attacking  the lowest cost non lead alternative, do you want to see steel shot prohibited? 

David , as you probably very well know , I am totally against soft iron shot as an alternative to Lead , because it is inefficient and ineffective in comparison . I am absolutely dismayed at BASC's about face , when not long ago BASC stated that there was no substantial evidence or reason to ban the use of Lead , in fact not too long ago Peter Glenser BASC CEO at the time said the debate was now over .

Furthermore I notice that no one has correctly answered my questions  asked in my last post !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Salopian said:

David Ilsley (BASC) said:-

Arguing against steel shot is totally counterproductive.

Meanwhile, we see some stating a 'lets show how bad steel shot is' as a way of defending lead shot, sorry guys but that  will not work! But worst of all you now start attacking  the lowest cost non lead alternative, do you want to see steel shot prohibited? 

David , as you probably very well know , I am totally against soft iron shot as an alternative to Lead , because it is inefficient and ineffective in comparison . I am absolutely dismayed at BASC's about face , when not long ago BASC stated that there was no substantial evidence or reason to ban the use of Lead , in fact not too long ago Peter Glenser BASC CEO at the time said the debate was now over .

Furthermore I notice that no one has correctly answered my questions  asked in my last post !

It is in that research. its on google books i just saw it.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=NspoQ2IQ66oC&pg=RA7-PA24&lpg=RA7-PA24&dq=steel+shot+effects+on+grassland&source=bl&ots=dcXfZ3zFBF&sig=ACfU3U0GU0A3h75naBMv-56GZDZ86bGicQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwir_ZHe5aboAhWLN8AKHdLCCMsQ6AEwCnoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=steel shot effects on grassland&f=false

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been trying to read some of these papers on lead v non toxic, it’s very tedious, to many variables and supposition for me. Lots of very site specific tests, birds are in there nature very mobile, and how can the history of any variable be taken in to account if it can’t be 100% verified.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that the ECHA asked for evidence and information on lead shot to be provided by 16 December 2019.   Presumably the UK shooting organisations responded, but I don’t recall seeing a copy of anything submitted on my behalf by either BASC or CA.   Have I missed something, or is this information not being revealed to the membership?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Enfield, I have already explained the difference between shooting over a clay ground (shot confined to a relatively small area and in some cases recovered too)  and shooting over fields etc (where the shot is deposited over a wider area into an environment where its not as easy to be recovered)  

Do people not shoot clay pigeons over fields etc.? And do wild birds not visit or forage over such fields where they do? Because in Leicestershire they do and over a couple of clay shooting venues are in the very same fields that between November to January that they shoot pheasants over. 

Please explain is what is the difference between in December and January a line of ten guns shooting fortnightly maybe two hundred cartridges on a drive of pheasants out of Covert Copse Wood on Lord Double-Gunn's estate and a line of ten guns shooting maybe weekly six hundred cartridges on a flurry on a simulated game day from the same Lord Double-Gunn's Covert Copse Wood five months later in May or June before he releases that year's poults?

Also did BASC do any research into how many clay grounds recover deposited lead shot? And what fraction is that of the total weight of fired lead expended there per twelve months? Or in fact did it do none at all?

Because being as you say "confined to a relatively small area" research would surely be able to compare bird deaths and other animal mortality (from lead shot ingestion) in a non-wetland area where clay pigeons have been shot to a bird deaths and other animal mortality over a similar non-wetland confined area where clay pigeons have never been shot wouldn't it?

There are clay pigeon grounds on non-wetlands in the UK that have been shot over for decades using lead shot. The shot fall-out area of some for example for forty years onto pasture on which sheep and or meat or dairy cattle have always been put out onto. So the researchers would not be short of finding venues to test the above question of the effect of lead shot on wild birds in that are of of wild or non-wild including livestock animals.

 

Edited by enfieldspares
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

I think non lead is currently available in 10, 12, 20, 16 and 28 and I guess they have these in production because there is sufficient demand in the UK. What others are available outside the UK  I don't know, but I guess it will be easy enough to find out?

Quote

Oh please, as you honestly going to rip apart every post I make, just because I am using conversational English?  Well I guess I can expect that of you... not exactly helping the debate are you?

Conversational English expresses well enough the truth of any position. Or are you saying that you could have written you response as this:

I know non lead is currently available in 10, 12, 20, 16 and 28 and I know they have these in production because there is sufficient demand in the UK. What others are available outside the UK I don't know, but I know it will be easy enough to find out.

Because firstly clearly I don't think you either did know or meaningfully got to know because the forcefulness of the response of the UK cartridge manufactures...they used in capital letter (as I do now) the word IMPOSSIBLE...gives the lie to being able to "have these in production" within five years. As does their rebuke about any consultation also give the lie to it being "easy enough to find out".

 

 

 

Edited by enfieldspares
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said many times and as we have posted on the BASC website we will continue to engage with the cartridge manufacturers and seek additional financial support for them.

The impacts of lead away from shooting grounds is well documented, but if you or anyone else wants to discuss banning lead from clay shooting grounds , I suggest you discuss this with the CPSA before posting such comments on forums.

As to the efficacy of steel shot, there are pages and pages on this and other forums from shooters who have been using steel for years to great effect. By the way, Peter G was not the CEO he was the Chairman

There is little more I can say at the moment, and most of the questions that have been asked and continue to be asked repeatedly can be answered by looking at the  FAQ section of the lead pages on the BASC web.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/03/2020 at 16:06, rbrowning2 said:

So we wade through and carry on as before and get to the end of this seasons game shooting to find 70% of the millions of game birds cannot be sold  as nobody wants to eat game shot with lead. What are we going to do with them? and how do we then justify repeating the whole thing again the following year, no market = no shooting simple.
You can bang on about how we should  have moved to steel years ago but in practice it has not happened in anything but a very small niche way and it is very unlikely the situation will magically changed over the next few years given it has taken twenty years to get to where we are today. 

I do not think adverts like this one, which carry a lead shot warning on them help with sales at all. If marketed LEAD FREE, i feel sales could well pick up.

https://www.campbellsmeat.com/product/whole-pheasant.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, lancer425 said:

I do not think adverts like this one, which carry a lead shot warning on them help with sales at all. If marketed LEAD FREE, i feel sales could well pick up.

https://www.campbellsmeat.com/product/whole-pheasant.html

cant see a problem with the ad,people can decide?,how about if food companies display "free range shot game" on their soup?,consumers who normally choose to eat game will know it's probably shot with lead,tesco have sold shot game but i've never seen it in the "reduced price section",

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, lancer425 said:

But it wont say. LEAD!

Yes, but the majority of none shooters who were buying game would not give it much relevance, whether it said ‘may contain lead or steel shot’ if its on the super market shelves they take it to-be safe to eat, and it is, lead or steel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...