Jump to content

US Election Results!


Lloyd90
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 598
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

14 minutes ago, WalkedUp said:

Doubt it, Biden is not likely to be as isolationist as Trump. China has boomed as the world super power in the vacuum the USA left. Whilst he was a China basher he also gifted them the no.1 spot. 

US focus has moved to that region under Trump, I don't know if Obama did the same but neither he nor his predecessors did much to halt China's rise.  China boomed well before Trump was in power, even being gifted the likes of that climate deal. He wanted Europe to defend itself against Russia (even Italy has a GDP larger than Russia's) but Germany recently had a mini-tantrum when asked to dig into it's own pockets. He has also tried to extricate itself from the Middle East and has been successful in forging a new alliance against the troublesome Iran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, yod dropper said:

US focus has moved to that region under Trump, I don't know if Obama did the same but neither he nor his predecessors did much to halt China's rise.  China boomed well before Trump was in power, even being gifted the likes of that climate deal. He wanted Europe to defend itself against Russia (even Italy has a GDP larger than Russia's) but Germany recently had a mini-tantrum when asked to dig into it's own pockets. He has also tried to extricate itself from the Middle East and has been successful in forging a new alliance against the troublesome Iran.

Yes I certainly think he achieved much more than Obama ever did, of that there's little doubt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/11/2020 at 11:17, figgy said:

Less messing around with votes by despot in Africa.

This in the country of the free and the brave. 

The lawless and rioters more like. 

Should put the army on the streets, start rioting or looting get shot simples. 

The whole voting ballot system needs a full refresh with full accountability. 

You've got all this multivoting by some,yet friends who married locals have citizenship pay taxes can't vote. 

It now appears that the computer system running the ballots is owned by Nancy Pelosi's husband. 6000 Trump votes 'accidentally' moved to Biden until someone noticed.  Every counting station is outfitted with these self same computers.

Hmmmmmmmm??????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Walker570 said:

It now appears that the computer system running the ballots is owned by Nancy Pelosi's husband. 6000 Trump votes 'accidentally' moved to Biden until someone noticed.  Every counting station is outfitted with these self same computers.

Hmmmmmmmm??????

Owned or invested in? Evidence or twitter? There are loads of these allegations. Lets see what the courts make of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Walker570 said:

It now appears that the computer system running the ballots is owned by Nancy Pelosi's husband. 6000 Trump votes 'accidentally' moved to Biden until someone noticed.  Every counting station is outfitted with these self same computers.

Hmmmmmmmm??????

Incorrect. It's got nowt to do with Paul Pelosi. Her former chief of staff lobbied for it - but after no longer being the CoS.

The mistake wasn't in the official counting, just a user error. The system did its job, but a stage was missed by the user in tabulating. It was spotted quickly and was sorted. It was reported by a Republican clerk and was not evidence of any fraud - as declared by both republicans and democrats on the ground in the county.  It failed at the first stage of checks - not even getting to formal canvassing or final confirmation.

Oh and Dominion's not used at every counting station. Some states used it, others use ES&S and there are one or two small ones too. 

 

Edited by chrisjpainter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Vince Green said:

Some suggestion that he can sign an executive order prior to leaving the White House that would pardon him and his family /friends/associates from anything hanging over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Vince Green said:

Then he will be able to share a cell with Biden and his son.  I notice the story about Hunter /China and the Big Man seems to have been covered up in the media now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NoBodyImportant said:

No, but it’s just a small clerical error that would not effect the overall election.  As all of the little inconsistent errors. 

Interesting thread, thanks for the reply. I honestly am not 100% on what to make of it all at this point, I'll be interested to see what the courts make of it all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Stonepark said:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/election-not-over-and-media-knows-it

 

Looks like it will go all the way, especially if all the fraud is proven........

On the basis of a blog post of an obviously partisan individual?

The thing i’d genuinely like to see from all those who suggest that there is a grand conspiracy of a scale involving millions of voters across all states is one bit of corroborated evidence.

There will be numerous individual cases where things have gone wrong, but in an election involving c.160m people that is going to happen. But where is the evidence of systemic failure or corruption that can account for even 1% of that?

We already know about the 6000 votes mistakingly attributed the wrong way, that issue was called out and owned by the official election body themselves.

Other than from Trump and his acolytes screaming it’s all a stitchup, (A bucket load of butthurt going on), i’ve not seen a single source put forward any issue of sufficient scale that could credibly challenge and reverse the outcome of the election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, grrclark said:

On the basis of a blog post of an obviously partisan individual?

The thing i’d genuinely like to see from all those who suggest that there is a grand conspiracy of a scale involving millions of voters across all states is one bit of corroborated evidence.

There will be numerous individual cases where things have gone wrong, but in an election involving c.160m people that is going to happen. But where is the evidence of systemic failure or corruption that can account for even 1% of that?

We already know about the 6000 votes mistakingly attributed the wrong way, that issue was called out and owned by the official election body themselves.

Other than from Trump and his acolytes screaming it’s all a stitchup, (A bucket load of butthurt going on), i’ve not seen a single source put forward any issue of sufficient scale that could credibly challenge and reverse the outcome of the election.

👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, grrclark said:

Other than from Trump and his acolytes screaming it’s all a stitchup, (A bucket load of butthurt going on), i’ve not seen a single source put forward any issue of sufficient scale that could credibly challenge and reverse the outcome of the election.

The outcome seems to have been decided by the media already, yet votes are still being counted ?
Several states have already committed themselves to recounts though , as per state rules on elections.

Legal challenges aside, this contest is NOT officially over, as most media channels would have you believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Stonepark said:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/election-not-over-and-media-knows-it

 

Looks like it will go all the way, especially if all the fraud is proven........

The original article (That link's just a copy and paste job) comes from American Thinker. Sadly there's no source material either.

Pennsylvania

What I can tell you is that the original article seems to have misunderstood the voting regulations or the counting procedure. Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Kathy Broockvar said that it actually affects 'a tiny proportion of the overall votes' (https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-supremecourt/supreme-courts-alito-tells-pennsylvania-counties-to-separate-late-ballots-idUSKBN27N030). Votes COUNTED after 8pm were legion, but that's not the same thing as votes CAST after 8pm. Republican state legislators blocked Pennsylvania from counting mail-in ballots early, so they all had to wait until counting on-the-day votes had been done. 

Nevada

What the article is doing here, it seems is lumping in provisional votes with the overall count. Provisionals are where there's some question as to whether they're valid votes or not, including second home registry absentee voting and all that sort of thing. Those get left to the end and are then checked on record to see if they've voted elsewhere or whether they can be counted. It's just the normal process. There's no evidence that thousands and thousands of votes are from double voters. It's a theoretical problem, not a practical one as they all get weeded out in checks. (Biden's lead is almost 35,000 in Nevada now)

Wisconsin

This is just incorrect. There have been rumours flying around that there have been more votes than voters, but it's simply not true. The Wisconsin register has 3,684,226 registered voters as of 1st Nov 2020 and 3,240,599 votes

https://twitter.com/WI_Elections/status/1324036035093909508

https://elections.wi.gov/node/7220

It's also worth bearing in mind that Wisconsin allows on-the-day registration, so anyone registering on election day wouldn't be included in the above figure of registered voters, but would be in the voting counting. A high turnout of 88%*, but then it always was going to be as both candidates were extremely aggressively campaigning there as a battle ground state. And no. As above in this thread, the dead haven't been voting in record numbers

Michigan.

By this stage the writer seems to have gone on an anti google rampage and confused independent articles with our supposed google overlords and forgotten that google's a search engine - it's not actually writing the articles. The reason why so many hits come back is that there's so much debunking going on of unsubstantiated accusations. Incidentally, google still brings up the claims, it's just there's still very little evidence beyond 'I heard...' and 'apparently...'

Also plenty of stories of judges getting exasperated with republicans bringing lawsuits and then having them thrown out because of a lack of evidence. 

*Washington Post has 75.5% turn out now.

Edited by chrisjpainter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...