Jump to content

This really is getting silly...


Recommended Posts

“Person giving birth” instead of “mother”

”chestfeeding” instead of “breast feeding”

NHS being told to include their pronoun on email signature  

and now a gender neutral Mr Potato head!

this virtue signalling nonsense from the left has to stop....I am pretty sure that very few of the tiny number of trans people actually care that words are used which reflect 99% of the population, it is getting just silly now. 
 

I wonder if the new toy potato has switchable genetalia?

F8263682-95D7-4AAA-AE1F-617DB423152F.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I’m assuming birth certificates will need changing then? Father? Mother? Sex or gender of child?
Passport applications? Driving license applications? 
The best way to get around this really is to just ignore it, and annoy those who insist on it into the bargain. 🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites

We now listen to the idiots instead of ignoring them.

1 minute ago, Walker570 said:

Exactly. Unfortunately many of those teaching in schools these days pedal the same garbage having been brain washed in Uni.

I do know some younger teachers and you are correct!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The chest covers other areas beside the breast area , we all have breast . As the fetus  is forming the breasts form first , one of the last things to form are the Genitalia  are , that defines us as male or female . That others may wish to change is upto them as they growup .  There sex remains the same , even if the cut bits of or other bits grow larger , we can't change nature , and why should we .  

Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Walker570 said:

Exactly. Unfortunately many of those teaching in schools these days pedal the same garbage having been brain washed in Uni.

Difficult to find many brains to wash maybe?

I am completely mystified as to the aim of all of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, old man said:

Difficult to find many brains to wash maybe?

I am completely mystified as to the aim of all of this?

To erase women. 

If there are no women only people then you get rid of sexism. Simples! 

1 minute ago, ehb102 said:

To erase women. 

If there are no women only people then you get rid of sexism. Simples! 

If anyone isn't quite catching the tone of my post erasing women is a REALLY BAD THING FOR WOMEN. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sort of reminds me of when I was working away in Swindon. One night in the bar of the place I was staying in the conversation got round to marriage

I said "My wife asked me why I don't do any of the washing, ironing, cooking etc? and I replied with Why do you think I got married?"

There was some laughter and one guy asked "what did she say to that" to which I responded "why do you think I am staying here!!!" 😜

 

p.s. Being military trained I can wash, iron and clean better than my wife :) but because I am a gentleman I don't like to rub her face in it 🤣

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, ehb102 said:

To erase women. 

If there are no women only people then you get rid of sexism. Simples! 

If anyone isn't quite catching the tone of my post erasing women is a REALLY BAD THING FOR WOMEN. 

Seems to be what they are clamouring for, I have reached the stage where I really don't care, they can try to be as hard as they like, I just avoid them and their games.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, ehb102 said:

To erase women. 

If there are no women only people then you get rid of sexism. Simples! 

If anyone isn't quite catching the tone of my post erasing women is a REALLY BAD THING FOR WOMEN. 

You've got me confused here liz . If there are no women ,only people , then there will also be no men . So , if you have no men and no women , and only people  , that will equal no sexism , but neither men , nor women , will benefit in any way ?.

Have I completely got the wrong end the stick ?.

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, islandgun said:

paris fashion week [alleged]

154583296_10160583707437004_1541147050416523987_o.jpg.771ea71917e88708c166a2253dae5e9b.jpg

I would . I'm not sure if it's the camo hard hat , or the sandals.  But I'd be on it like a tramp on hot chips 😊.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, mel b3 said:

I would . I'm not sure if it's the camo hard hat , or the sandals.  But I'd be on it like a tramp on hot chips 😊.

😄 Im not sure what the person is keeping in its y fronts, is that baldricks face ?

Edited by islandgun
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, islandgun said:

Im not sure what the person is keeping in its persons y fronts, is that baldricks face ?

As soon as I've had a rummage in the pantaloons,  I'll let you know . You'll probably be able to tell what I found by the expression on my face . If I'm doing my wee Jimmy krankie smile and a thumbs up , it was probably a girl , but , if I'm doing my shocked Mr bean face , I've probably found a gentlemans undercarriage.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, mel b3 said:

As soon as I've had a rummage in the pantaloons,  I'll let you know . You'll probably be able to tell what I found by the expression on my face . If I'm doing my wee Jimmy krankie smile and a thumbs up , it was probably a girl , but , if I'm doing my shocked Mr bean face , I've probably found a gentlemans undercarriage.  

I think your going to be disappointed. There is definatley a 5 O'clock shadow there. Lin is much prettier anyway. 🤷‍♀️

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, loriusgarrulus said:

I think your going to be disappointed. There is definatley a 5 O'clock shadow there. Lin is much prettier anyway. 🤷‍♀️

Ive told her many times ,  that she has a face that would stop a clock 😅😅😅😅

Edited by mel b3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mel b3 said:

You've got me confused here liz . If there are no women ,only people , then there will also be no men . So , if you have no men and no women , and only people  , that will equal no sexism , but neither men , nor women , will benefit in any way ?.

Have I completely got the wrong end the stick ?.

But women are different from men. We have less muscle mass, we have periods and babies and suffer different conditions and more autoimmune conditions. Our lives are different, we are treated differently. The material reality will remain but we just won't be allowed to talk about why we are murdered and raped and battered and fired when pregnant. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Scully said:

😂 Instead of being King Edward’s we may just have to call them all spuds. 

iv'e started to chit some Charlottes gawd knows what will come up after they are planted .🤔 

If memory serves i'm sure there used to be potato women and potato kids !

Edited by derbyduck
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, ehb102 said:

But women are different from men. We have less muscle mass, we have periods and babies and suffer different conditions and more autoimmune conditions. Our lives are different, we are treated differently. The material reality will remain but we just won't be allowed to talk about why we are murdered and raped and battered and fired when pregnant. 

Good post. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...