Conor O'Gorman Posted April 19, 2021 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2021 5 hours ago, Fellside said: Conor, I have now read the paper you sent me re lead shot / terrestrial habitats. Well..... more of a literature review really. I have to say it was very robust and thorough. This is the authoritative evidence I’ve been looking for - and does leave us in no doubt re phasing out lead shot. May I recommend that this paper becomes your ‘gold standard’ study’ - the clincher. The earlier biased and weak papers which were being bandied about were never credible. You were always going to meet resistance with those. I think you (we) have an irrefutable evidence base now. I hope you didn’t mind my earlier challenges re the initial papers - they had obvious problems which needed highlighting. Thank you for your efforts. @Fellside Thank you. I was expecting the opposite reaction (or none at all) as your feedback on the paper and I apologise for misjudging your clearly open minded position on this topic. For those that have not read the paper it is here: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-019-01159-0 And that paper is part of a wider collection of papers published in 2019 evidencing the latest research on the impact of lead ammunition on wildlife, environment and human health here: https://link.springer.com/journal/13280/volumes-and-issues/48-9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.