Rewulf Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 20 minutes ago, old man said: Just illustrates the success of the Public Prosecution Service under his guidance? It does jndeed , a useless snivelling waste of space. Can you imagine him as PM ? I think Id rather have had Corbyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enfieldspares Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 Somers Town. I've had breakfast there a few times and the odd pint of Guinness in The Cock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie b Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 It was mentioned in my Google news about a private member's bill to ban pump action guns this is obviously put forward by some one who spent time playing with computer games and watching action films were its always the weapon of choice were as in reality a side by side can be reloaded and fired far quicker after the initial three shots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunman Posted January 16, 2023 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 How about Mr Starmer calls for criminals to be banned and for tighter controls inner city gangs ? Now that would get some votes . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossy835 Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 they will go for us the easy targets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 1 hour ago, Gunman said: How about Mr Starmer calls for criminals to be banned and for tighter controls inner city gangs ? Now that would get some votes . Too much like hard work I’m afraid; much easier to clamp down on soft targets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armsid Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 GORDON R that is what i meant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remimax Posted January 17, 2023 Report Share Posted January 17, 2023 (edited) yep easy hit every time ,i see Canada are having testing times regarding trying to ban everything that goes bang. Edited January 17, 2023 by Remimax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man Posted January 17, 2023 Report Share Posted January 17, 2023 20 hours ago, Rewulf said: It does jndeed , a useless snivelling waste of space. Can you imagine him as PM ? I think Id rather have had Corbyn Neither for me thanks. the cozy swamp swaps must end, we need people that work not shirk their way through their terms not wreck thlngs then take a rest? How we achieve this I have no idea? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jall25 Posted January 17, 2023 Report Share Posted January 17, 2023 Get posting on his facebook and instagram sites and tell him its the criminals that are the issue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted January 17, 2023 Report Share Posted January 17, 2023 11 minutes ago, old man said: How we achieve this I have no idea? They sway that anyone who WANTS to be a politician , is unfit to be one ? We could start there ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conor O'Gorman Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 BASC has briefed Labour MPs and written to the office of Sir Keir Starmer, offering to meet in person to discuss the topic of firearms licensing in more detail, following comments that he made during the LBC Radio interview including: “There are many illegally-owned guns out there and there are legally-owned guns, which I don’t think should be in the hands of the people who are legally owning them”, and: “people have access to guns that they shouldn’t have access to”. https://basc.org.uk/basc-briefs-labour-party-following-firearms-licensing-comments/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 Well done Conor, he needs to clarify what he's talking about with those comments 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 26 minutes ago, Rewulf said: Well done Conor, he needs to clarify what he's talking about with those comments 👍 I seriously doubt he knows what he’s talking about; just another politician doing more harm than good through sheer ignorance and an eagerness to score points at every opportunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 25 minutes ago, Scully said: I seriously doubt he knows what he’s talking about; just another politician doing more harm than good through sheer ignorance and an eagerness to score points at every opportunity. His words are carefully chosen non the less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 2 minutes ago, oowee said: His words are carefully chosen non the less. Really? If so then from what he said, he doesn’t think there should be any legally owned guns out there. At least we now know where he stands on the subject of firearms ownership come voting time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnfromUK Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 2 minutes ago, Scully said: Really? If so then from what he said, he doesn’t think there should be any legally owned guns out there. At least we now know where he stands on the subject of firearms ownership come voting time. There are certainly some in his party of that view (with a very few exceptions for certain occupational needs). There is also much talk in his party of enforcing storage of guns in an armoury at a club (which to me makes a really attractive target to the criminal). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 1 hour ago, Scully said: Really? If so then from what he said, he doesn’t think there should be any legally owned guns out there. At least we now know where he stands on the subject of firearms ownership come voting time. Realy? “We’ve had these incidents from time to time with guns, there was one down in Plymouth last year, and every time there is , there’s evidence, which I am concerned about, that people have access to guns that they shouldn’t have access to. “Now with illegal access that’s a pure matter of criminal law. But other people where better checks should be taken on circulation of guns. So I think that we need to look again as to whether those laws are strong enough.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted January 25, 2023 Report Share Posted January 25, 2023 (edited) 14 hours ago, oowee said: Realy? “We’ve had these incidents from time to time with guns, there was one down in Plymouth last year, and every time there is , there’s evidence, which I am concerned about, that people have access to guns that they shouldn’t have access to. “Now with illegal access that’s a pure matter of criminal law. But other people were better checks should be taken on circulation of guns. So I think that we need to look again as to whether those laws are strong enough.” Which just goes to prove my point, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about! If he knew what he was talking about, and honest with the facts, he would have said that ‘we have some of the most restrictive firearms licensing legislation in the world, yet these things happen mostly due to the Police not administering that legislation and guidance consistently and effectively.’ The quotation marks are mine of course. But he’s the leader of the opposition isn’t he, so honesty plays no part. The Police issued the license in the case Starmer referred to, seized that firearm and then returned it to him despite growing concern he wasn’t suitable to possess. Durham constabulary did exactly the same with Atherton, with a very similar outcome. It is never the Police however which bear the consequences, but innocent lives lost and increasing legislation for legitimate firearms holders who played no part but share the guilt by association. If we based and administered other licensing systems by the same manner, there would be very few vehicles on the road. Edited January 25, 2023 by Scully Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
39TDS Posted January 25, 2023 Report Share Posted January 25, 2023 Well said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penelope Posted January 25, 2023 Report Share Posted January 25, 2023 2 hours ago, Scully said: Which just goes to prove my point, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about! If he knew what he was talking about, and honest with the facts, he would have said that ‘we have some of the most restrictive firearms licensing legislation in the world, yet these things happen mostly to the Police not administering that legislation and guidance consistently and effectively.’ The quotation marks are mine of course. But he’s the leader of the opposition isn’t he, so honesty plays no part. The Police issued the license in the case Starmer referred to, seized that firearm and then returned it to him despite growing concern he wasn’t suitable to possess. Durham constabulary did exactly the same with Atherton, with a very similar outcome. It is never the Police however which bear the consequences, but innocent lives lost and increasing legislation for legitimate firearms holders who played no part but share the guilt by association. If we based and administered other licensing systems by the same manner, there would be very few vehicles on the road. On the bloody nose! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted January 25, 2023 Report Share Posted January 25, 2023 As I said. His words were carefully chosen. Factual to a fault but carefully chosen nonetheless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted January 25, 2023 Report Share Posted January 25, 2023 48 minutes ago, oowee said: As I said. His words were carefully chosen. Factual to a fault but carefully chosen nonetheless. No, I don’t get that at all. What he said displayed a clear misunderstanding ( or ignorance ) of the facts or how things work and where responsibility lay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man Posted January 25, 2023 Report Share Posted January 25, 2023 IMHO he knows exactly what he's thinking about and the die is cast? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted January 25, 2023 Report Share Posted January 25, 2023 18 hours ago, oowee said: His words are carefully chosen non the less. Grant , I know hes your mate ect , but seriously , carefully chosen from what ? A random word generator ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.