Jump to content

What do you think


Recommended Posts

The stalker is wrong to tell the client too  take the shot when the buck is inline with trunk , and the client was wrong in taking the shot. Ultimately it was the stalkers responsibility to ensure his client is taking a safe shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, holloway said:

Not done any stalking myself ,but that looked risky to me . Dare i say it looks like the deer may have moved a little after death 🤔

how does anything "move a little after death"

although the shot was totally unsafe imho,that Deer dropped like it was pole axed AND it was, also imo a lucky shot because he wouldn't have been aiming where he actually hit AND the optic on the rifle didn't look like it was up to the job of taking on a shot at that distance which is why he missed the engine room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zoli 12 guage said:

how does anything "move a little after death"

although the shot was totally unsafe imho,that Deer dropped like it was pole axed AND it was, also imo a lucky shot because he wouldn't have been aiming where he actually hit AND the optic on the rifle didn't look like it was up to the job of taking on a shot at that distance which is why he missed the engine room.

How does something move after death ? answer …… you move it down a slope to make the  back drop look safer .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, holloway said:

How does something move after death ? answer …… you move it down a slope to make the  back drop look safer .

You may be right. I would say the dog went to where the buck was shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, London Best said:

You may be right. I would say the dog went to where the buck was shot.

yes i thought that , the follow up filming just seemed odd to me almost like he knew he needed to justify the shot ,( or maybe i'm just of a suspicious nature 😐)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, holloway said:

yes i thought that , the follow up filming just seemed odd to me almost like he knew he needed to justify the shot ,( or maybe i'm just of a suspicious nature 😐)

Yes, he knew it was risky.
The still of the shot is bad enough, but when I watched the video I could not believe he even considered that shot. It was uphill shooting at a ridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Rewulf said:

Skyline shot, no real back stop and no idea what's behind that hedge.

He's that eager to get the kill shot for his video, he threw the safety book out the window.

Appalling disregard for safety, especially with how shaky he was on the shot.

The further you watch the video the more you realise that any "unseen" backstop that we the viewer might not yet have known was there in fact isn't there at all. I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...