Jump to content

Assisted dying


scutt
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ditchman said:

i can remember the conversation my wife and i had...in the staff room with the doctor...we asked to see the doctor and he made time and a private area to have the conversation...i remember it very very well altho it was over 2 decades ago.....i / we had never heard of Liverpool pathway or assisted death............it was a truthful and frank and honest conversation....

even now i feel a great sense of relief talking about it....as it was so dignified as to how it was handled........this is how (as i now know) how things were handled in the old days...

I am glad it was like that for you DM. Having had a brief chat with my wife just now reminded me how aggrieved she, as next of kin, nor her mother - who still had 'all her marbles' - was because neither of them were at any stage consulted before the implementation of the 'pathway'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In principle I'm fully behind the idea. The problem is the human element. Frankly I don't trust all doctors and nurses to have the persons best interests at heart. I'm not blaming them, but when you see death everyday, your loved ones demise is just a regular Tuesday to them, I've seen it with family already, let alone if assisted dying we're aloud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Miserableolgit said:

I am glad it was like that for you DM. Having had a brief chat with my wife just now reminded me how aggrieved she, as next of kin, nor her mother - who still had 'all her marbles' - was because neither of them were at any stage consulted before the implementation of the 'pathway'.

the reason you wernt consulted is because it is illeagal to kill someone.................often the old ways are the best   and then the woke /liberal/.left wing school get hold of it and start to (what was perfectly adiquate in the first place) and "tinker with the issue...

which really is a recipe of the modern ills of today....politically and medically

dont get me started

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, welsh1 said:

My worry with assisted dying is coersion, in canada there seems to be a creep from you asking, to practitioners suggesting, and if you are vulnerable this shouldn't be allowed.

This, this and this!!!

I believe that there is a disabled female veteran, was offered MAID, when all she was asking for is assistance with living.

Edited by Penelope
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Miserableolgit said:

To the best of my memory I do not recall her or her next of kin [my wife] being asked. In fact I just checked with her and my wife confirms that was the case.

Our situation was even more difficult due to my wife's sister being a nurse instigating the thing. We weren't consulted in any way by anyone and the rift is evident now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The proposed Bill for Assisted Dying has safeguards including sign off by two doctors and a High Court Judge for each case. I wonder just how quickly this process could move forward. Two doctors, probably not too slow but a High Court Judge? Would one really be available to consider a case in time to make the decision relevant? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just listening to the debate on the radio now. I understand protecting the vulnerable those that might be subject to pressure but little thought for the thousands that want a way out. If faced with the reality of a prolonged, painful and miserable last few months of my own life then I would want that choice. In my view the bill does not go far enough.

Edited by oowee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/11/2024 at 19:44, Miserableolgit said:

To the best of my memory I do not recall her or her next of kin [my wife] being asked. In fact I just checked with her and my wife confirms that was the case.

Our situation was even more difficult due to my wife's sister being a nurse instigating the thing. We weren't consulted in any way by anyone and the rift is evident now.

1 hour ago, oowee said:

Just listening to the debate on the radio now. I understand protecting the vulnerable those that might be subject to pressure but little thought for the thousands that want a way out. If faced with the reality of a prolonged, painful and miserable last few months of my own life then I would want that choice. In my view the bill does not go far enough.

Fairly sure this will fail as we seem to have a failed view on how to be humane?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, old man said:

Our situation was even more difficult due to my wife's sister being a nurse instigating the thing. We weren't consulted in any way by anyone and the rift is evident now.

Fairly sure this will fail as we seem to have a failed view on how to be humane?

Seems the bill has been passed now. A step backwards in my opinion. A radio show I listened to yesterday had a palliative care expert on saying most countries that pass assisted suicide bills then go on to reduce spending in palliative care. You can see how that would encourage people towards assisted suicide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rob85 said:

Seems the bill has been passed now. A step backwards in my opinion. A radio show I listened to yesterday had a palliative care expert on saying most countries that pass assisted suicide bills then go on to reduce spending in palliative care. You can see how that would encourage people towards assisted suicide

The two things don't have to be exclusive. What the debate has done is raise the issue of palliative care, which can only be a good thing. To reject the bill would be to ensure the suffering of thousands that would want the opportunity to exercise their choice. There is much work to do before this can become law. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive rolled this one over and over in my mind , and I just can't come to a yes or no .

I think the government would be better to give the vote to 500 people that are terminally ill , and see what they think.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mel b3 said:
8 minutes ago, mel b3 said:

Ive rolled this one over and over in my mind , and I just can't come to a yes or no .

 

 

 

Same here. 
I just keep thinking, ‘it’s bad enough having your dog put to sleep,’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, London Best said:

Same here. 
I just keep thinking, ‘it’s bad enough having your dog put to sleep,’

 

9 minutes ago, Boristhedog said:

It is, but it’s also the right thing to do. 

That's why I'm struggling with it , because even totally opposite opinions,  are both the right answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...