Jump to content

Gregg Wallace


ditchman
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, Scully said:

He’s a bit of a car crash isn’t he! 😄

I don’t think his Instagram comments will have endeared him to many! Hilarious! 

Personally I reckon he has been rather stupid after the events, anything he says on social media will just bring further complaints to the fore.   :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Penelope said:

A sign of the times!!!

I agree, but I find some of the comments made on this thread ridiculous and not what you would expect from the usual high standards on this forum. Let the man be, what's next - bunch of karens demanding that risque post cards are banned from seaside gift shops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, B686 said:

*** don’t give people ideas🤣

Too late the bans started in 1953 and have occurred on and off since then  but not publicised. 

This is the main driver of the current situation  ££££££££££

Edited by Yellow Bear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Weihrauch17 said:

An MP is now calling for the show to be pulled from air so as not to 'trigger' his victims, Jesus H Christ truly pathetic.

I don't know if I would call them victims really. What happened to the days of telling someone to go fornicate with themselves when they said something you didn't like and then getting on with your life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rob85 said:

I don't know if I would call them victims really. What happened to the days of telling someone to go fornicate with themselves when they said something you didn't like and then getting on with your life

Victimhood is a way of life for the woke; their whole raison d'etre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rob85 said:

I don't know if I would call them victims really. What happened to the days of telling someone to go fornicate with themselves when they said something you didn't like and then getting on with your life

"Hate speech" is far worse than terrorism in some eyes   --  sham the same is not applied to "hate taxes"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funnily enough there's a huge difference between having a laugh with someone you know and a man going out of his way to remind you that in his eyes you are not a proper whole person, you exist purely in relation to him, and his eyes you are simply a collection of holes in which he can insert his penis. 

If you can't tell where the line is between jokes and what I've said you need to turn off the porn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ehb102 said:

Funnily enough there's a huge difference between having a laugh with someone you know and a man going out of his way to remind you that in his eyes you are not a proper whole person, you exist purely in relation to him, and his eyes you are simply a collection of holes in which he can insert his penis. 

If you can't tell where the line is between jokes and what I've said you need to turn off the porn. 

Hello, Good Post 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ehb102 said:

Funnily enough there's a huge difference between having a laugh with someone you know and a man going out of his way to remind you that in his eyes you are not a proper whole person, you exist purely in relation to him, and his eyes you are simply a collection of holes in which he can insert his penis. 

If you can't tell where the line is between jokes and what I've said you need to turn off the porn. 

*Splutters coffee out*
Whilst Im sure there are some men out there who think like this, Im also sure there are some women out there who think similarly (in reverse obviously)
Ive always thought Wallace was a bit cheesy, a bit Sid James style, but in all seriousness, is this whole story newsworthy ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going forward, the big question now will be will John Torode be willing to continue working with Wallace. Personally, I would have thought that in order to preserve his own brand image the answer must be No. Particularly if Lisa Faulkner has any say in the matter. 
Just seen a press note. The writings on the wall…… the Sun already reports that Gregg is furious that Mr and Mrs T have “unfollowed” him (whatever that may mean) and failed to defend him. And there’s speculation that Lisa Faulkner may replace Gregg. (No, please not her)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ehb102 said:

Funnily enough there's a huge difference between having a laugh with someone you know and a man going out of his way to remind you that in his eyes you are not a proper whole person, you exist purely in relation to him, and his eyes you are simply a collection of holes in which he can insert his penis. 

If you can't tell where the line is between jokes and what I've said you need to turn off the porn. 

Is that a collection of holes in one individual or the group?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Bobba said:

Going forward, the big question now will be will John Torode be willing to continue working with Wallace. Personally, I would have thought that in order to preserve his own brand image the answer must be No. Particularly if Lisa Faulkner has any say in the matter.

Looking at the interaction between Ms Faulkner and Mr Torode on their cookery program, I would doubt that Ms Faulkner would have anything to say without Torode OKing it first.
Torode has a very dominant, borderline bullying relationship with his partner, that is often uncomfortable to watch.

Then theres this.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13986149/John-Torode-Lisa-Faulkner-Greg-Wallace-rude-jokes.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dougy said:

I'm amazed nobody has attempted to sue Nigella Lawson, i mean it,,,,  i have watched her cooking programmes and had to switch off !!! she's been so rude. 😆:wub:

She's always licking something provocatively and there's never a complaint 😅😅

3 hours ago, ehb102 said:

Funnily enough there's a huge difference between having a laugh with someone you know and a man going out of his way to remind you that in his eyes you are not a proper whole person, you exist purely in relation to him, and his eyes you are simply a collection of holes in which he can insert his penis. 

If you can't tell where the line is between jokes and what I've said you need to turn off the porn. 

How did you get from someone being a smug idiot to there??

3 hours ago, oldypigeonpopper said:

Hello, There are more revelations now, Nudity and a Sock !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! , To be honest even with so few people coming forward it sounds as though he is a right T**T as a Presenter, but I bet the viewing numbers go up !!!!!

Think that was on page two 🤔😅

4 hours ago, Scully said:

He’s a bit of a car crash isn’t he

This thread is a car crash, I keep coming back for another look 😅😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Yellow Bear said:

Too late the bans started in 1953 and have occurred on and off since then  but not publicised. 

This is the main driver of the current situation  ££££££££££

Certainly. Local libraries started removing books relating to big game activities years ago?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...