gunsmoke Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 From the minutes of the LAG now on line. http://www.leadammunitiongroup.co.uk/LAG%20-%20minutes%20-%20April%202014.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------To receive a report outlining the methodology and actions of the WWT compliance monitoring study (Action Point 10.2)8.1. The Chairman thanked Dr Cromie for circulating this report.8.2. There were no questions on the report.----------------------------------------------------------------------------Are the WWT now going to policing wildfowling?When did monitoring the lead ban regulation become the remit of the LAG.Is the steering group set up to look into the compliance with the lead shot regulation still meeting? Are BASC going to be involved with this study? Are the government going to be funding this study? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunsmoke Posted May 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 9.6. It was questioned whether LAG might consult external experts in ballistics and toxicity, especially from other countries which have experienced full or partial replacement of lead ammunition, and from those who, having banned lead ammunition, are now reintroducing it Who is reintroducing it? is this because of the report on the ST web site that Norway are going to repeal their lead ban? Are there any other countries going to be going back to lead shot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunsmoke Posted May 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 9.10. The possibility of withdrawing insurance for shooters who illegal used lead ammunition was also discussed. However, it was felt that this would be technically very difficult to achieve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunsmoke Posted May 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 9.12. There was discussion over the need to demonstrate the viability of non-lead shot types when shooting wildfowl. There was a general feeling that most non-lead shot types were not viewed to be as effective as lead, and that a series of demonstration events could be a useful way to show effectiveness and variety of other ammunition types and how best to use them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cookoff013 Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 From the minutes of the LAG now on line. http://www.leadammunitiongroup.co.uk/LAG%20-%20minutes%20-%20April%202014.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To receive a report outlining the methodology and actions of the WWT compliance monitoring study (Action Point 10.2) 8.1. The Chairman thanked Dr Cromie for circulating this report. 8.2. There were no questions on the report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are the WWT now going to policing wildfowling? When did monitoring the lead ban regulation become the remit of the LAG. Is the steering group set up to look into the compliance with the lead shot regulation still meeting? Are BASC going to be involved with this study? Are the government going to be funding this study? is someone from the wwt going to stand next to you and see every cartridge you use? they`ll be wearing the official uniform, windmill on head, bells and whistles at the ready and big drum just in case. lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.