Granett

As other Brexiteers have explained, there were always going to be more racists attaching themselves to the Leave campaign. It seems North has cleaned up his site. I've Google and here's an article that looks like it covers most of it: How offensive does Richard North have to be to alienate his loyal readers? https://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/dec/17/richard-north-blog .

Lol. This blogger is the "expert Brexiteer" people roll out, who also denies climate change and uses racist terms all over his blog.

You threw your toys out of the pram and said you weren't going to talk to me. What happened? We could write that promise on the side of a bus, perhaps. I've posted some quotes before but they went over the heads of people here. I presume you're referring to those in order to try and resurrect the flawed counter-argument that was made before. It is hilarious how quickly the arguments run out and the ad hominems come out.

Lol. A puff-piece in the Mail about Farage in the days after the death threats against the MPs. And it's swallowed hook line and sinker by those who claim to be immune to manipulation by the media.

Pretty miserable Daily Mail article going for Stalinist-esque persecution on its front page. Not much of a surprise to see its dog whistle has generated the desired response and Brexiteer death threats have started coming in again... If I recall correctly, it's only Brexiteers that have issued these sort of death threats on the past, and committed murder over this matter... Let's hope they don't do it again.

What do you mean? "Brexit, the way you hoped it would"? Brexiteers voted for unicorns. They're getting donkeys in dunces' hats and blaming other for not delivering pure fantasy. I don't think there's any need for apology.

Bit of a joke at the expense of the Brexit team from Mr Tusk, I see:

It stems from when I nearly got banned for being the only poster to call someone out for saying Britain belongs to white people (in fact, I copped a fair bit of flak for speaking out). Since then, it's clear certain generalisations are valid and appropriate. But I'll ignore the elephant in the room if that's the way PW is moderated.

Lol. Before the referendum this was what was dutifully regurgitated out of the Express and the Mail as "Project Fear". Now it's "What we all knew to be the case". There are plenty of quotes from Brexiteers from before the ref showing they expected a soft Brexit. Just because PW doesn't understand that, doesn't make it less true.

That sounds like the perfect argument for a second referendum now we have a clearer view of the shambles that is being made of Brexit. Anyone see this about the Brexit champion: David Davis says he doesn't have to be clever or 'know that much' to be Brexit secretary - David Davis says he doesn't have to be clever to manage Brexit. - Brexit Secretary told LBC he just has to stay "calm" in negotiations. - "Anybody can do details," Davis said. - Davis defended decision not to commission Brexit impact assessments. http://www.businessinsider.com/david-davis-does-not-have-to-be-clever-to-be-brexit-secretary-2017-12

Eh? No you haven't. PW! Such a bizarre level of debate.

Lol. Have you demonstrated where the doc demonstrates "a deliberate plot to dilute our culture and national identity so that we sleep walk into the globalist's new world order." I see neutron has posted another new wall of text (having made an excuse to give up on the debate previously) which I'll look at if I think have time tomorrow. In the meantime though it's hilarious to see other Brexiteers "+1" stuff posted by him that directly contradicts stuff they've posted themselves!

Wrong about what? Cut and paste the bit(s) in there that prove "a deliberate plot to dilute our culture and national identity so that we sleep walk into the globalist's new world order." While you're answering that why not also answer how PW contributors, were they even-handed would commented about a 30 year old letter that set out the advantages we subsequently benefited from as EU members?

Lol. Pointed out your Daily Express was engaging in its fake news again, dressing up a letter as a newly discovered document you mean?

It is just as far fetched. I'll concede that that Daily Express article will pull the wool over some of its readers eyes and to them it might seem more plausible, but that's not quite the same thing. Here's a challenge for you - can you print the full wording of "Secret document FCO 30/1048" (LOL. "Secret document FCO 30/1048" - I bet that name made so many readers feel so X-Files) and its timing and authorship? If you've not discovered that so far, you'll learn a lot. Edit: cross posted with above. Excellent. Have a read of "Secret document FCO 30/1048" in full and then say what you think it proves.