Oops Missed Again Posted January 4, 2014 Report Share Posted January 4, 2014 I've seen on many forums (including this) people giving the Cynergy a battering. Which has made me wonder, whats actually so wrong with this gun? Is it just because it looks a little different so the oldies like it as their stuck in their ways? Serious question I think you maybe right, when something new comes on the market so many people give them a battering before they've even fired one, let alone owned one. How many critics on here have stripped a gun down? and I mean every pin and spring, evaluated it and then criticized. Not many I bet. But that's life these days, a lot of people thinking they know a lot because they have picked it up and swung it around. I believe people like that should stick to things they know about not what they think they know about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spot.ontheroad Posted January 4, 2014 Report Share Posted January 4, 2014 I have shot a 20 bore Cynergy sporter (normal stock) for 18 months. It's a fantastic gun, fits beautifully and hits what its pointed at. Recoil on 28g loads is no more than felt from a 12g, but 24g is a more comfortable shoot. I would not part with it. It is a super bit of engineering the only minor let down possibly being (what I regard as) skimping on the ejector design/execution. From what I read here though it seems to be a bit like Marmite...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.