Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'choice of 2'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Pigeon Watch Community
    • Welcome to Pigeon Watch
    • Off Topic
    • Events and Meets
    • Sporting Pictures
    • Sporting Shooting Videos
    • The Trading Post
  • Pigeon Shooting
    • Pigeon Shooting Tips
    • Pigeon Decoying Equipment
    • Talk From The Field
  • Country Sports
    • Airgunners
    • Guns & Equipment
    • Bullets, Cartridges and Reloading
    • General Shooting Matters
    • General Licence Discussion
    • Clay Pigeon Shooting
    • Other Types of Shooting
    • Gaining Permission & Shooting/Ferreting/Beating Opportunities
    • Motoring Section
    • Gamekeeping and Shoot Management
    • Country Sports
    • Dogs and Dog Training
    • Craft and DIY Section
    • Food and Drink

Product Groups

  • Shotgun & Firearms Certificate Wallets
  • Bergara Folding Shooting Seat
  • PW Merchandise

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


From


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. Hi all. Quick enquiry to gauge opinion on the following 'dilemma'. Recently granted my SGC and looking to make my first purchase. After a visit to my local RFD, I have given myself a choice of EITHER a second-hand Beretta A400 Lite (black synthetic) OR new Beretta A300, same finish. With the new gun (at a price of £915) there's a three year warranty (option of 10 years for a £50 fee to Beretta) and 3 chokes. With the used gun (at a price of £995) there's a three month warranty and 3 chokes. To most, and to an extent to me too, that looks like a no-brainer of a decision. But, I seek the views of more experienced shooters and Beretta owners please. The RFD lists the A400 as being in good condition and having had light usage. My eyes can see that indeed it does look in good condition, but not so easy to determine previous use. (It has that kind of GunPod feature that claims to count every round put through it, but perhaps that info is on an app in the possession of the previous owner.) It also has that Kick-Off recoil technology in the butt. For a fee I secured it for a demonstration and put 51 shots through it. It jammed 3 times in that session which could have been due to the design of the budget cartridges provided at the clay centre. Direct comparison with A300 not possible as no demonstrators available. I don't want to exceed a budget of £1k (still got peripherals to consider on top), and I'd prefer a (fairly) low-maintenance gun that may have better appeal to a used market if/when I upgrade or if I find I'm not involved enough to justify possession. Going for a synthetic stock as I found I got a bit precious about a nice wooden stock on a Theoben air-rifle I had and I don't want to amplify that on an expensive shotgun. If budget allows further down the road in life, I may look at that option then. So, is the A400 so far superior to the A300 that it's worth the trade-off, or am I really not gonna notice the difference? Usage will be purely for clays with, perhaps, a very slim chance that coastal water-fowling opportunities will come my way. It may well be that in the time taken to decide, the A400 sells to another buyer and this whole post becomes moot...or rhetorical...but I'd rather make an informed decision, see? My own internet research has, thus far, proved inconclusive. Thank you for taking the time to at least read this.
  2. hi gents, up for sale is either of my sako varmint stocks. one is a new, original sako walnut stock, the other is a custom job i had made a few years back, made out of zebrano. £275 posted for either, i'm sorry but i can't seem to upload pics but i can email them to anyone who's genuinely interested. Ta, gram.
×
×
  • Create New...