Fascinating thread, this. It illustrates an unhappy truth about the shooting community, which is that whilst most shooters are enthusiasts who devote time to learning about and understanding their sport, a significant proportion are clueless and don't mind proving it by posting their, umm, misapprehensions.
When I was a youngster, back in the sixties and early seventies, the Shooting Times was at its zenith, boasting a stellar range of contributors. In my humble opinion the most distinguished was the gun editor, Gough Thomas, actually Gough Thomas Garwood, a retired civil engineer. He also wrote several books on the sporting shotgun, and I recommend "Shotguns and Cartridges" as an essential read, particularly to those who lack knowledge about velocity, shot sizes, chokes and patterns, and about the relationship between bore, weight of charge and weight of gun. You never know, we might then get fewer daft posts from people who try to compare apples with oranges......and then declare that the banana is best of all.
And, tomaddy525, I suspect you're still a comparative youngster. The boastfulness of youth gives you away. I see you claim to have been shooting pinkfeet at 55 yards with 32 grams of no.4 shot while out with your dad. I have my reservations about your capacity to judge range; it's notoriously difficult to do so on the foreshore. That notwithstanding, my son sometimes shoots alongside me, and if I saw him deliberately taking what he considered to be 55-yard shots at geese with the charge you claim to use, he'd be back at the car right away with a flea in his ear, and possibly a boot up his backside. I've no doubt that a lot of geese have been killed by over-ambitious shots with unsuitable equipment - but far more have been wounded and died a miserable lingering death. Respect your quarry, and operate within your limitations AND THOSE OF YOUR GUN AND CARTRIDGES. Now go figure!
Best regards to all!