tomov
-
Posts
117 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
PW Shop
Posts posted by tomov
-
-
As another new FAC grant I found oddly enough depite being granted all three I am using FAC air the most at the moment so much that I have put in a variation to upgrade my FAC air to one with a bigger shot count as I was spending too much time walking back for refills to the car!
And right there is the craziest thing in our current licensing system - the 'one for one' variation. Form shuffling with absolutely zero rational justification...
-
No bother mate - just drop me a PM.
-
You're basically talking about creating an anchor to allow you to lean out over a drop. Perfectly possible to set up safely with normal climbing kit but will probably not meet any sort of professional regs. If you've got to ask how to do it, then frankly, you shouldn't be - it doesn't sound as if you know how to create an adequate anchor (not necessarily very easy in normal cheesy dolomite limestone), how to equalise it, how to best attach yourself or how to ensure any level of redundancy in the system. None of these things are skills that are learnt overnight.
-
Neil
I've got a Seeland Hercules folding job - nice and easy to put up and take down, though I've never tried one of the telescoping ones which may be even easier. You are welcome to borrow it to see if it suits your needs if you wish.
Tom
-
Not enough blokes from the Black country on here...
Chicken Balti, obvs!!!!
-
You just need a stalker's apprentice to do the heavy lifting mate - sure there'd be a good lot of blokes keen to help in return for a bit of experience.
-
All this stuff about renewal is a bit hysterical isn't it? Lets look at what the guidance notes for grant or renewals say shall we...
You must not withhold information about any conviction. This includes motoringoffences, binding overs, formal written warnings, cautions and convictions in and outsideGreat Britain, and (by virtue of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order1975) convictions which are spent under the 1974 Act. A conditional discharge and anabsolute discharge both count as convictions for this purpose. Details of parking offencesand fixed penalty notices do not need to be declared.
-
Fishing match for a good cause - take a look.
-
Folks
My local beagle pack are running a fishing match not far from Junction 10 of the M40 on 7th June and still have a few pegs left.
£25 per team, including coffee and a bacon roll when you get there. Lunch is available on the day. Fishing from 09.00 to 18.00.
Lovely venue, with some nice carp, perch, roach and rudd.
We've got some good prizes, courtesy of kind donations from Browns at Leighton Buzzard.
Drop me a PM if interested - pegs are limited so first come first served.
-
For what it's worth, I put a few of the old ( blue box) Winchester's through my Annie 1417 alongside the new ones (black box) last week and the group sizes were v similar...
-
Democracy mate. No one said it was perfect...
-
I just do not get it, Jones is anti hunting yet he has joined BASC and excepted with what seems like open arms, do those at BASC Towers not have the power to reject applications from unsavoury types
In fairness to BASC, I actually think they handle their governance stuff pretty well - there aren't many organisations who have their 'board' (council) minutes on such prominent display (front page of their website) for example. I have no problem with the process - I'd just say don't vote for the guy!
-
Just adding my two-penneth, for what it's worth: having spoken to an MP about lobbying etc in the distant past, the value of a former MP fighting your cause in parliament is not to be sniffed at... They know the best ways of making things happen very quickly in parliament; they basically know how to work the system in your favour. If they're representing BASC's issues (I've just become a member myself), then perhaps, irrespective of their past slippery ways (and let's face it, what MP doesn't have a slippery past?), they could be immensely useful for the future...
Absolutely and a lot of organisations use current or ex politicians to good effect - the CA's Kate Hoey, Baroness Mallalieu and Simon Hart all spring to mind. But can the management and oversight of an organisation that claims to represent all shooters in the UK really be trusted in part to someone who has used the language and voted in the way that Martyn Jones has done?
Personally I would feel extremely uneasy about his ability to champion and negotiate policies that I would be comfortable with.
-
-
Here's a nice quote from Mr. Jones (2008);
“Any move to reopen the issue of fox hunting is utterly ridiculous. The Act was only passed into law in 2005 and was widely debated. It is an act which signalled the end to a cruel and outmoded form of upper class enjoyment."
Leaving aside any particular views on hunting with hounds, it does rather suggest that Mr. Jones is not afraid to use the class based rhetoric so beloved of shooting's opponents. He must get on well with George Monbiot!
I would urge any BASC members who think that Mr. Jones' views on hunting make him an unacceptable candidate to use their vote wisely and to make sure that their fellow BASC members know of Mr. Jones' stance.
-
It's called a 'non-contribution' clause - a legally defined get out clause which some orgs use to keep costs down. Basically the second (often cheaper!) insurer step away once they have established there is other cover in place. The original intention here by insurers was to cut admin where two covers existed for good reasons eg personal belongings are covered anywhere in the world (for 60 days usually) under your household policy but then you take out travel cover which overlaps - the latter often has a non-contribution clause. Of course it should prevent more than one claim for the same loss - not that PW members would even think of doing that!
What this man said!!
-
Neil
Sounds like you'v got a good grip on it to me mate. I'm sure i downloaded a sample RA template from the BASC site (there's loads online anyway).
Redgum - mine was much the same experience!
-
Neil
You don't say whether you think it would be safe to shoot with either .17 or .22. Presumably you've thought it through though as otherwise you wouldn't be contemplating it. If that's the case, I'd suggest that you need to demonstrate to your firearms team that you can shoot over the land safely - explain to them which areas and arcs of fire are safe, how you would manage any risks (like telling the landowner you are going to be there for example) and what adaptations you might need to make (like shooting from a high seat).
Some will take the **** for this but do a risk assessment! Make as strong a case as you possibly can, communicate it properly and generally (in my experience) common sense will (usually!) prevail.
-
Not a lot of people know that - particularly me as a non member. It's perhaps sad that, " you might like to sign this" turned out that the majority did not like to do so.
Sorry - my frustration wasn't aimed at you !
-
So the CA emailed it around, but very few signed it?
Yes, basically. I'm not sure if BASC did but it was certainly in Shooting Times as well.
I suppose my point (if I have one) is that it's easy to criticise the representative organisations (not that this was necessarily your intention when starting this thread or that such criticism is always unjustified / not useful) but that sometimes individuals, even when 'spoon fed' don't always take action themselves. It's generally easier to blame 'them' than to take responsibility for your own inaction. We all do it to a greater or lesser extent
For what it's worth by the way, I signed the petition and I have no interest whatsoever in pistol shooting.
-
Exactly
Exactly
Exactly
Not being a member of either of those two organisations, I was not entitled to say it, but as you both have, I can agree. Just imagine the fuss if a 200,000 signature petition landed on No 10's doormat! However, one must ask, where is the NSRA in all this? Could it be that they're not in favour of it?
Wymberly
I may not have made myself clear. My point is, it's in the bloody CA email!!! And it's on the front page of their website (and has been since late March).
-
Ridiculously, I'm in the CA, BASC and the BDS.
I am a member of the CA (and before that the BFSS) because I come from a background of hunting with hounds and the CA is the only organisation effectively representing that particular sport. My BDS membership reflects my interest in stalking and wider interest in deer. BASC I just joined to be able to book ranges at Bisley, although I think they do good work with promoting shooting sports.
Even being a member of all three costs me less than £200 a year, which I can ill afford but in terms of what I spend on shooting / hunting overall isn't that much and I feel duty bound to try and secure some kind of future for field sports.
The insurance influences me not one bit.
-
Be really helpful if the CA sent it round on their Grass eRoute email wouldn't it?
http://www.countryside-alliance.org/ca/grass-e-route/grass-e-route-27th-march-2014
-
I said that there was just not enough reason for the press be that the BBC ,broadsheets or red tops apart from perhaps the Telegraph for stories to be picked up and no matter how loud or energetic a press officer is ,if there's no leaning to pick up the story they won't.
Spinach
I'm interested in this bit of your post. Are you saying that the Liberty and Livelihood March in 2002 didn't achieve the press coverage that you expected?
Folding 12
in Wanted
Posted · Edited by tomov
Chaps
I am in need of a folding 12 bore, can be single or double. Cosmetic condition not important but must be working. Face to face preferred. Based in Bucks but will travel within reason.
Any body got anything or know of a suitable gun in an RFD?
Cheers!