Jump to content

The saga continues


dieseldogg
 Share

Recommended Posts

I really do not know what was so difficult about my variation for a Sako Quad.17HMr/.22LR

But I was informed this morning that "one of the Senior officers"

is looking at it,

Is this cos they ### it up the first time?

I may yet be obliged to invoke the portcullis effect

PS

how much does one require to bung an MP for this service?

Your

Next exciting installment

Say sometime in 2010

Or am I being optimistic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe its just an inexperienced FEO and the their head hurts at the fact it could be classed as two rifles but theres only one reciever :o

 

Just wait until you get it and they have to put down THREE serial numbers on your FAC but its only 'two' rifles' :yp: :lol: (One for each barrel and one for the reciever)

 

Mine just went down as a .17HMR Rifle and a .22lr spare barrel, with a condition so that it could be used for vermin with either barrel. Personally i think it would be easier just to list it as an unspecificed calibre reciever and 2 spare barrels, which would make getting the serial numbers onto your FAC the easiest, but what do i know :good:

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...