Jump to content

Browning

Members
  • Posts

    1,748
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Browning

  1. how contradicting

    :blink: many many years reloading and yet your telling this chap to get out and shoot more rather than spend his time reloading and leaning

     

    and all cos that time would be better spent behind the butt practicing, exactly what would be happening when load testing, no better practice than that

     

    this particular RL7 .243 is still a dangerous load, especially for someone new to reloading, shame a few more on here can't be bothered to say so.

     

    Not at all what I am saying Paul, what I am trying to say is that if your hunting rifle is consistantly shooting sub 1/2" groups then time would

    be better spent behind the butt shooting/practicing than trying to squeeze a further 1/8" out of it.

     

    I kind of assumed that load dev had been done correctly already.

  2. well thats fantastic you have such a good rifle and the ability to load such consistant ammo,well done you are very luck to have such a tool.BUT others are not so lucky or gifted that no more work is needed,so your statement "I dont want to be stood at the loading bench" isnt quite right now is it,as your sorted as others may not be,if you know what I mean

     

    No luck involved Ackley, just a good gunsmith and many many years reloading.

     

    I think you're kinda missing my point on the rest of my post.....

     

    If I/you (anyone!) has a rifle that can consistently shoot sub 1/2" groups, then why do you need to waste time and money getting it to shoot sub 3/8" groups

    when that time would be much better spent behind the butt practicing?

  3. it takes no longer to load bullets correctly and too a consistant standard than it does to to them poorly,so you wouldnt actually be spending any extra time at your bench

    with better ammo you can spend even more time out in the field as you will be so impressed with what you have acheived you will want to shoot even more

     

    I disagree. All of my rifles consistently shoot sub 1/2" groups. My rifles are working rifles, they are there to do a job and they

    do that job very well (even if I do say so myself). They would do no better a job if they were shooting 3/8" groups. The vermin,

    foxes and deer will all still be just as dead.

     

    I would not have wasted time and money by trying to squeeze that extra 1/8" out of the rifle.

     

    What I would have done is spent more time shooting the rifle, which I firmly believe will gain me more confidence than an extra 1/8" smaller group size.

  4. Consistant half moa accuracy is indeed very good accuracy and if your combination is acheiving this, yes of course its is good enough for any rifle under normal hunting conditions but accurate rifles are interesting and if yours is capable, then why not strive to extract just that little bit extra?

     

    Ian.

     

    As I said in my earlier post Ian, I would rather spend that time out in the field using the rifle, than stood at my reloading bench

    trying to squeeze an extra 1/8" accuracy out of it when it is not required.

  5. amen to that,

     

    I'm in the happy to go out and use it, my reloads when conditions are perfect do sub 0.5" and after that I couldn't give two hoots. I just reload more to the same spec and go and use them, I don't enjoy shooting paper its a means to an end. When something works it stays

     

     

    Spot on !!!

     

    I can never understand the fixation of getting any hunting rifle to 'clover leaf' or 'tack drive', if you can get sub o.5" it is perfect for

    normal hunting conditions.

  6. I always find it hard to understand why some people are perfectly happy to settle for "it will do" and "its good enough" and not strive to get the best results from their reloads.

    I can only assume that in their whole lives evertyhing is "just good enough" or "will do" and there is no motovation to achieve any sort of excellence.

    For the majority of handloaders the search for this "excellence" is the main goal and reason for handloading, which inturn manifests itself in the accuracy and consistancy of their hand loaded ammunition :)

     

    Ian.

     

    Many people spend more time out there shooting, than sat at home reloading and talking about it.......

  7.  

    So a few questions-

     

    1. Are we being twice as unkind by having two dogs in the house on their own?

    2. Will he upset my dog coming into the house as the older dog. I do make a point of me being pack leader.

    3. I cant stand the current name, is it easy enough to train a dog to respond to a new name?

    4. What is the best way to introduce them?

     

     

    1. No, they will keep each other company. If dogs are to be left alone it is far better to have two together than one on it's own.

    2. Depends on how you introduce them. Make sure you stay pack leader, they will work out their own pecking order.

    3. Yes. If at all possible try to pick a new name that has a similar sound to it's existing name.

    4. Try to do the introduction outside whilst at play and away from the home. If possible do it gradually over a few days

    so they get to know each opther before you bring the new dog home permanently.

     

    Good luck with everything.

  8. You purchase an extended (uncrimped) magazine, along with new spring and extended end cap. Either from GMK or get

    your RFD to get them for you.

     

    Then have your RFD fit and tranfer from your Section 3 to your Section 1.

     

    You obviousely must have a multishot slot on your Section 1

  9. Dan, they will be absolutely fine around the shoot, just not in the release pens when the birds are very young.

     

    Once the birds get out and about the half plastic containers will be no worse than the ponds, ditches, puddles etc,

    that the birds will be drinking from. All mine are topped up as I do the wheat rounds anyway so it's very little extra work involved.

  10. I will pack the camera next time mate just for you :good:

     

    That should keep the doubters happy Ackley, can you try and get a couple of fields, a hedgeline and maybe even a stone wall in it, and make sure

    you place a red 'X' to mark the spot.......

  11. Every time I shoot a 500+ yard kill, I happen to forget my camera. Must happen to all the others too :trolleyes:

     

    So what would a photo prove? That a hare had been shot at some point by someone at some distance?

     

    Like Ackley says, pictures of live stuff are far more interesting than pictures of dead stuff.

  12. I read somewhere a few years ago, that with todays modern cartridges half choke is the most efficient choke for all ranges of shooting.

    This includes clays and live quarry shooting and this seems to work OK for me.

     

    I have friends that are so choke obsessed that they will continually change chokes between shots, not just on clays, but also on live birds.

     

    I was told the same thing last year during a conversation with the MD of a UK based cartridge manufacturer and a very well known England team shot, since then I have used 1/2 & 1/2 for everything and my shooting at both vermin, game and sporting clays has improved noticeably.

     

    I know it may all be in my head.....but it worked for me.

  13. I use the BEC 75 style hanging drinkers in all of my pens and get on OK with them.

     

    I hang them from a frame (two uprights and a cross bar) approx 2' high, keeping the length of line short to minimize swing in the wind.

     

    My pens are quite sheltered so I've never had problems with losing water because of swinging too much.

     

    Make an upturned 'V' out of wire mesh and pin it to the top of the frame to stop the poults roosting on the frame

    and crapping on the drinkers.

×
×
  • Create New...