Browning GTS Posted September 19, 2012 Report Share Posted September 19, 2012 Why does he not turn his energy to real cruelty like the abuse of dogs that is so often in the news? Instead of wasting his time on legal decisions taken to protect our food. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poontang Posted September 19, 2012 Report Share Posted September 19, 2012 Why does he not turn his energy to real cruelty like the abuse of dogs that is so often in the news? Instead of wasting his time on legal decisions taken to protect our food. I'm sure that'll be next on the agenda now he's been made Vice President of the RSPCA!!! He's nowt but a publicity whore, and given time will end up being ridiculed in the same way Bono and Bob Geldof are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night blaster Posted September 20, 2012 Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 I'm sure that'll be next on the agenda now he's been made Vice President of the RSPCA!!! He's nowt but a publicity whore, and given time will end up being ridiculed in the same way Bono and Bob Geldof are. Ha ha, how much wildlife have ever turned up to their gigs, apart from the ones caught inside the steel security fences trying the get out when the bongos start up! It's great how they educate themselves on "sun style evidence" after years of sniffing suger style substances! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guest1957 Posted September 20, 2012 Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 What annoys me most his the level of intellectual dishonesty he demonstrates, particularly given that he studied for and was awarded a PhD. For example, he says that 'all' scientists are against a cull, yet this quite clearly isn't the case. If he were true to his intellect he would say that some believe it will work, others don't and that he is inclined to side with those who don't. Instead he is letting intellect be clouded by emotion, so can't be taken seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reece Posted September 20, 2012 Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 What annoys me most his the level of intellectual dishonesty he demonstrates, particularly given that he studied for and was awarded a PhD. For example, he says that 'all' scientists are against a cull, yet this quite clearly isn't the case. If he were true to his intellect he would say that some believe it will work, others don't and that he is inclined to side with those who don't. Instead he is letting intellect be clouded by emotion, so can't be taken seriously. Quite right. Many scientists are in favour. This is typical of the antis - they try to make it look like they have majority support, even if they clearly don't. When emotion comes in through the door, logic disappears out the window. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashman Posted September 20, 2012 Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 We need joined-up government here: Also have a cull of elephants and hey presto: top-quality ivory-handled, badger hair shaving brushes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddy Galore! Posted September 20, 2012 Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 We need joined-up government here: Also have a cull of elephants and hey presto: top-quality ivory-handled, badger hair shaving brushes. Ahhh, luxury Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browning GTS Posted September 21, 2012 Report Share Posted September 21, 2012 We need joined-up government here: Also have a cull of elephants and hey presto: top-quality ivory-handled, badger hair shaving brushes. Good thinking that man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.