oozelumbird Posted April 25, 2007 Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 I think if we are all honest and cost put to one side, we all know we need insurance for shooting. Weather you shoot in the field or on the clay ground. Accidents do happen. For sake of £40.00 you could make all the difference in the case of a lost limb or other injury. Would be good to know what others think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Posted April 25, 2007 Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 If it became mandatory then it would be £180 per year and the government would probably tax it. As you say in your post we all know we need it and should have so really there is no excuse for not having any. Car insurance is mandatory yet people are prosecuted every week for not having any. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catamong Posted April 25, 2007 Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 Fortunately, shooting accidents are extremely rare. You are far more likely to be injured or injure somebody else whilst skiing, for instance. If you are a houseowner, you probably already have insurance for Public Liability under your household policy, it's worth checking to see whether shooting is covered. If you are a BASC / CPSA member, you're covered, although it's worth checking out the full details of cover, as it might not be as extensive as you think. Cat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEFTY478 Posted April 25, 2007 Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 NGO's insurance is £25pa for Third party insurance* to £5 million, through NFU Mutual Insurance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.