Jump to content

6.5 x 55 Jack of all trades


Malinois
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

my firearms dept said they would not reccomend a .17 for fox control and would rather give me authority for another gun so I went for a 22-250 and a 6.5 x 55 for deer. They have stipulated I can use the 6.5 x 55 for fox when out stalking.

 

However, 10 years ago whe I had a .308 they stipulated on my licence that if I loaded rounds under 100 grains I could use it for fox control. Do you think I could get the same stipulation for the 6.5 x 55?

 

Any useful info to help my case.

 

Thanks

 

Ian

Edited by Malinois
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you? You should be able to get the 6.5 for fox without the "when out stalking" caveat without need for stipulating < 100 grains. Worth a call to your local firearms dept to check it out - but they may then ask why you want the 22-250 if you're only going to use one calibre for everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have no problem dropping the 22-250. Having a jack of all trades will save me a few quid and I suppose I could play into their hands and site safety by not having to carry 2 rifles and leave one in the car if shooting should follow on into the night with lamping.

 

I am in North Yorks area.

 

 

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would definitely keep the .22-250. It is a superb foxing round, a simple point and shoot. I too had a 6.5x55, but its trajectory wasn't great for foxing, and those hefty bullets don't break up with ease inside Charlie. Home Office guidance states that the 6.5x55 is dual purpose. I never had any specific condition for foxes only when out after deer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not even sure what my conditions say at the moment! At one time or another I have had Fox and Deer as a condition on my 6.5x55, so it is possible. According to the guidelines it is acceptable to have it just for Fox.

 

I suggest that you tell them you often need to lamp Fox after a stalk. As your conditions are at present you need to take two guns and provide security for the one not in use which isn't practical in the area you shoot. If you make it out to be a big security issue that you are worried about they should do as you ask without question, as firearm security and safety is their number one priority ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...