leon

Thanks gents, waiting for a reply to an email I dropped Keith. Thanks Leon

Anyone gents... :-)

They have a top seal which is the one giving me the problem, it's the getting at it bit that I need to sort. Cheers for the replies gents

Hi all, I have a mk II Parker hale dragon that needs stripping and repairing, so I need either a strip down diagram before I start or a suitable gsmith who is used to working on these. Can anyone help with either. Thanks in advance Leon

Hi all, just grabbed this out of the cabinet after a little while and its suffering from hydraulic lock, has anyone had this problem and rectified it themselves? if so any pointers would be greatly appreciated or even an exploded diagram of the parts if you have. Thanks in advance Leon

As above one is two year old and works well the other has seen a bit at the end of last season ones a poley the others white.

It's just a stock I am after mate. Thankyou anyway though.

As above let me know. It's only the stock I am after. Leon

The one I had from you is on my .223 as in the other "chicken trouble post"

Just sorted my camera out and down loaded the photo's that I couldn't get at so thought I would post a couple these were all taken over lambing time. More More

hornet the .17 is a fast little round, but i would imagine (as have never fired or used this round in the field) that it will suffer from simply causing surface wounds like the .204 can. As it uses a very light projectile. .222 or .223 would be far better choices. They give you an extra 100 yards effective range over the hornet (180ish yards max) and would be more inherantly accurate (not to say the hornet is inaccurate as it isnt, its just harder to get to shoot straight) ammo/reloading components are typically expensive as they are harder to come by, and its a fidley load to reload (should you ever get the chance) Having said this i love the round and with a pinch of lilgun, rem brass/primers, and a 35grain vmax, its the buisness. It also moderates very nicely. Never the less the practical choice keeping it smallish is .222 or .223, bigger than that, .243 .22-250. Dunganick Did you not read the post "only accept .17 or .22 hornet" Dazza Hornet is teh way I would go mate I reckon thats accounted for more foxes than a .17 and like Dunganick says it can and will shoot really well and personally I think it's beeter for when the breeze is up a bit. Leon

**** eh, saw a remmy VSSF II shoot a 3/8th inch group with American eagles today, the rest of it's groups hovered mainly around 1/2 inch to 3/4 inch, nope, wouldn't take it as a present Just my opinion mate what do I know eh!

CZ all the way for me the remmy's are **** now the old ones shot o.k but the newer ones don't seem up to it anymore

Or The Hunting life both Glen Waters and Woodga are on there