Jump to content

Krieghoffoverblaser

Banned
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

417 profile views
  1. Crikey another shooter your slagging off. With the average you have maybe invest in lessons instead putting these people down
  2. I only met him for the first time yesterday. What I can say is what I found that’s it. I’ve heard numerous TOP shots At garlands berate the product you talk about I wished I’d have seen some posts and saved myself some money. If the top shots say it’s naff it’s probably naff. I paid in full for my time with him and have since booked numerous hours this year so no fan boy here. I have had an inbox from someone I believe is sponsored by BH whom you know who’s told me your name and not to engage with you because your hatred clouds your judgment but yet you run when you see him in person? Which I guess is what his posts about in the first place. I have now asked about your email now I know whom you are and it seems your have a go at the sponsors technique was laughed under the table !
  3. Not really mine as I fall u see the **** average hence I don’t argue. But b class shooters with a axe to grind arguing that world and Olympic champions are wrong is ridiculous
  4. But that’s where social platforms give voices to the wrong people. I play a lot of golf and I wish we had some of the best in the world to offer advice via forums as I’m sure we would listen. In shooting champions offer their time and advice and you get someone with a awful average and voice trying to argue. It’s simply ludicrous to argue with a world champion, Olympic champion and one of the best recognised eye specialists, also it isn’t third party it was to myself directly. the gent in question openly showed us emails he receives and his sponsors (He was genuinely open about it) and the replies that were sent and none of them are or were taken seriously and were laughed about between parties. I would suggest this has raised already high profile and has caused no harm at all.
  5. You sound very bitter and twisted, I would back his assumption on the device you stated I tried it and cannot see the concept. Having spoke to an Olympian and a eye specialist about it at the time via a social media platform they also dismissed its uses. So it would appear your hatred should be directed world wide not just towards a person. I do believe all sponsors are on board and some big announcements on large scale uk based shoots and individual deals are in the pipeline (bh hope i can say that)
  6. I actually took a leap of faith yesterday and took part in one of his masterclasses. What a great day filled with laughter and the knowledge we received and the way it was taught was first class. This subject came up and very professionally he stated “there will be the haters side and then the truth I pay no attention to social media trolls apart from holding them accountable through lawyers for what they say” all in all a very personable and polite guy and I will return !
  7. Interesting concept. Can you point me to the article that stated cheating ?
  8. Agreed but no one I repeat no one knows what for. Your once again assuming... we will never know is the point I’m trying to make. You get aggressive because I’m assuming he’s innocent yet you assume he’s guilty a bizarre occurrence
  9. im not defending anyone here. Simply stating both sides. It maybe he was guilty but got let off on technicalities hence the zero information post.
  10. was / is it a awful mud slinging excercise
  11. I would say so. There has been a gentleman make accusations that have been removed and two statements by either party. I would say a amicable solution was reached that didn’t embarrass either parties and a gagging order placed over the entire thing. That’s a great legal team.
  12. No one knows. Just rumours !! Good lawyers I would say on both parts
×
×
  • Create New...