Jump to content

Two more questions, Shot Size, and Case length


Recommended Posts

Firstly, If i have a recipe for a 70mm case, and I want to use a 67mm case, can I just shorten the packing wads I put in by 3 mm? Or does the shorter case change the pressures or velocity?

 

Secondly, I have some reloading data, and it just specifies a shot weight and not a size, I assume that means its on to use any size as long as the weight is correct?

 

Sorry for more silly questions!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest cookoff013

also, dont try and load a "bird shot" recipe with buckshot. it doesnt respond the same way. (or vice versa)

 

buckshot #4 is the smallest buckshot,all the way to LG / SSG. these are not compatable with birdshot recipes. the lead doesnt flex/compress as much.

 

the recipes are out there, just look for one and select it. thats probly the hardest part about loading. finding a good recipe.

 

i stick to 9000psi, if a load goes pear shaped, it would have to double its psi to even get close to burst pressure.

it takes something very special, or something very intentional for that to happen.

 

most modern guns have a burst pressure of 17,000psi. that was generally a rule. i`d expect a baikal to withstand more,(not undamaged though)

than a poor(er) quality firearm.

 

birdshot is for birds,

 

anything else is for "other"

 

with any normal recipe, i would happily use any shotsize up to and including #1 and BB. anything else is more of a buckshot type cartridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I generally try to get a nice crimp and this means filling a case of whatever length with a suitable wad of whatever length so it all works. With fibre especially you just have to use a wad that takes up just enough space for a nice crimp despite what the recipe calls for.

 

I wouldn't worry too much.

 

 

That said, stop being awkward and just use a 70mm case like everyone else :P

Edited by sitsinhedges
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I generally try to get a nice crimp and this means filling a case of whatever length with a suitable wad of whatever length so it all works. With fibre especially you just have to use a wad that takes up just enough space for a nice crimp despite what the recipe calls for.

 

I wouldn't worry too much.

 

 

That said, stop being awkward and just use a 70mm case like everyone else :P

 

 

He he i did think about ordering a load of new 70mm cases, and just using them,

 

But I want to load subs and I have just over 50 Eley Hushpower cases here :) but they are 67mm! So do i use new 70mm blank ones? Or the nice pretty hushpower printed 67mm ones? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He he i did think about ordering a load of new 70mm cases, and just using them,

 

But I want to load subs and I have just over 50 Eley Hushpower cases here :) but they are 67mm! So do i use new 70mm blank ones? Or the nice pretty hushpower printed 67mm ones? :P

 

 

Go to a clay ground on a sunday afternoon with a sack and fill it with empties for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use what you like the used cases will be fine, I have not loeaded subs, but I guess the reduced powder charge will result in longer length wads than for a normal full charge. so you will have to experiment and may be cut a wad in half or thirds to add to a full wad to fill the case as required.

 

Some kind forum member may already have a load they may like to share.

Yes I will already have to use a 20mm fibre wad and a 5mm fibre wad (Which will be a 20mm cut in 4!)

 

So i was hoping i could leave out the 5mm wad and use a 67mm case! But being new to it I was worried about the pressures!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought that too, although I was getting the opposite impression from clay and game!

 

But I think it was sitsinhedges that pointed out to me there is a recipe that is the same components just more grains of powder for a "sonic" load.

 

I haven't seen the recipe he states "officially" listed though. (perhaps he could tell me where he saw it)

 

So in theory the pressure should be low, if there is a sonic load with the same ingredients!! (or so I would have thought!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest cookoff013

you of little faith :lol:

 

By the very nature of a subsonic load pressure will be much lower than a standard load. :good:

 

 

no, it just depends on the powder. vectan AS is slower than titewad. titewad gives higher pressure with subsonic loads compared to AS.

titewad is a better powder for subs application. whereas AS is better for 1oz loads (above 1200fps)

the pressure for titewad, 1,1/8oz load is about 7000psi (which is very respectable)

most powders get very twitchy below 5000psi, some are twitchy at 7000psi (longshot, h110 .. to name a few)

 

there are even faster powders that need higher powder charges, ~25 grains + but they can only push 1oz of lead 900fps.

 

i`d get a more modern book, than 1955, most powders used today, werent even invented back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest cookoff013

12gauge

 

i`m sure the book is a good read, even my lyman 5th, is getting abit dated with no speed steel recipes. it is 5 years old now.

its data is stil valid, but more powders have come on the market, they arnt in it. several shot types have come out. they are not in.

i`d rather trust that than a book from `55. i`m not saying th principals or physics have changed.

 

wad height is a good topic to discuss, the longer the wad cup, (notice, i said wadcup) the more contact and the more resistance a load will have.

pressure etc.

 

in 1955, i`m sure the speed of shells were slow. and have got faster, and faster. they even tried shooting steel back then.

 

i bought a lb of titewad for £20 (think it was £17.80). it is redily available as it was the most popular choice for light cartridges.

 

it works out at... 4.4p a shot, that is quite cheap, especially as subsonic ammo is up at £240 /k

 

makes you think eh?

 

for a sub load i think it is the one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest cookoff013

i think there is a vectan equivalent,

 

lowsonic.

 

the load isnt on the limit when 16 grains are used. i think (i read) 18 grains gets the load to 11000psi still safe !

 

safe loading.

 

my point was its safer to knock off 2 grains from the right kind of recipe, than to knock off 1/3 the charge to bring the speed down.

i bet the titewad load will still run nicely in wintertime. where coldness affects performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...