Jump to content

FAC with epilepsy?


Oxon88
 Share

Recommended Posts

Possibly. It all depends on his GP's/Doctors recommendation, unfortunately it will ultimately be up to him to decide, and the police will follow the advise given.

 

The best course of action is for your mate to go have a good chat with his GP, and make sure there is no confusion over what he wants his SGC for and how he'll manage to be safe with his condition, rather than an information request randomly dropping on his doorstep from the police.

Edited by Bleeh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have several medical conditions which would have a affect on beig granted a SGC, and when it came to the interview, the FEO said he had contacted my GP to ask his opinion. I was fortunate that my GP showed no objection in me being granted a SGC.

 

It could be down to your GP, if the medical conditions are stable and how long the condition has been stable for, as in my case for several years, and the GP confirms this the FEO did not have any objetion in giving me a SGC. It could well be worth having a chat with the GP, to see what s/he thinks its also worth having a word with the FEO to see if its best to apply for both certificates or just say a SGC and if they have any problems in granting certificates with the medical conditions your friend has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does your friend drive? I have a relative with epilepsy which is controlled by drugs who has a driving licence, the condition has to be declared to Swansea and the doctor consulted but as long as the drugs are doing their job (and they are), then there's no issue.

 

If your friend is in the same boat and the doctor is happy for them to drive, then I don't see how the police can refuse an FAC on the grounds of their epilepsy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a member of our club who had epilepsy and the Met would not allow him to continue. They said that if he had a seizure he would not legally be in control of his weapons. He could only continue if he travelled in the company of someone who also had his rifles on their FAC so that in the event of a seizure they would be able to take control of the rifles.

This seemed heavy handed but I can see where they are coming from. He couldn't drive anyway so would have to be transported to and from the range. The Met were more than happy to add his rifles to someone else's FAc to facilitate the process but in the end we couldn't find anyone willing to take on the job because he lived a very long way away from the range.

The insurers also wouldn't allow him to shoot on the range unless supervised on a one to one basis for much the same reasons.

Edited by Vince Green
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...