watcher Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 simple question..but clueless on the answer so here goes...is there any difference between the difference models? are the newer ones more accurate than say the mk1? thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr williamson Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 (edited) I had a tx 200 SR and its diferent to normal tx200s in the wau it shoots hellishly accurate.not that tx200s arnt because they are, but this was better. Not sure how lol stock was different cant say i noticed any other differences. The hc is the carbine (short barrel) version. And genrally the the early models differ cosmeticly to new model by havong diferent finnishes to the timber amd chequring. As for new 1s being more accurate o wouldnt of thought so. Edited June 25, 2012 by mr williamson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washerboy Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 sr had the moving sledge, it was semi recoiling and was up against pcp guns when fieldtarget shooting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smilersmiff Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 I had a tx 200 SR and its diferent to normal tx200s in the wau it shoots hellishly accurate.not that tx200s arnt because they are, but this was better. Not sure how lol stock was different cant say i noticed any other differences. The hc is the carbine (short barrel) version. And genrally the the early models differ cosmeticly to new model by havong diferent finnishes to the timber amd chequring. As for new 1s being more accurate o wouldnt of thought so. I own a Tx200 MK1 SR and agree with everything you say, they are a pleasure to shoot and very very accurate, some people think the earlier model to be a better gun than the newer models. Also from what I understand the SR version is getting rarer and thus more in demand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcher Posted June 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2012 Ii thought the same chaps.. I going to keep my beads open for one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daveo26 Posted June 27, 2012 Report Share Posted June 27, 2012 MK1s no rachet on the side, none shrouded barrel, In my opinion having owned a mk1 and a couple of mk3s the older ones are better made. Just sold a mk1, they weigh a ton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobby Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 Have a mk2 and it is deadly accurate but a tad on the heavy side. build quality is superb with the exception of the cocking shoe issue (only had to change 1). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washerboy Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 mk3 and htc are easyer and safer to cock, htc is just shorter . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oscarsdad Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 I had a mk1 and sold it as it was too heavy to us with a scope mounted lamp. I miss it. It was incredibly accurate and I beat many PCPs on a field target course with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nescafem Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 İ have the Tx200 Hc mk3 and man love this gun.Deadly accurate,not heavy like the tx200 mk1 and the quality is awsome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.