Jump to content

Whats the flimsiest reason you've heard of for losing ticket


Bangon
 Share

Recommended Posts

i know a guy who claims he lost his when his wife rang up to say they spliting up.

 

The fact that your wife is leaving is not, of its self, reason to revoke a certificate. There would have to be other reasons.

 

In reality, a cert can only be revoked if you no longer meet the statutory conditions for having a cert which are laid down in the Firearms Act. Those being; that you are a danger to the public safety or the peace, that you have become a prohibited person or that you no longer have good reason to possess the firearm.

 

J.

 

A good idea if you are in that situation is to store your firearms at a dealer. The police could argue that they were concerned that the firearms could be used in a stressful situation as has happened in similar situations.

 

Simply getting divorced is not good enough reason though. If it were then people would be getting revoked left, right and centre yet they aren't.

 

J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, there may be some confusion here - is the above directed at me?

My experience is 100% confirmed...and I was not doubting the one you mentioned.

 

Regards,

Gixer

snapback.pnggixer1, on 09 September 2012 - 10:43 AM, said:

 

Dependant on circumstance!

 

 

He got into a fight and hit a guy over the head with a bottle ABH. He rep-applied three years later and got it back.

 

I am explaining the circumstances. The person i was referring to and what happened in his case as above. For those that are a bit thick i will post it again in a way they will understand. The person that i know had his firearms certificate revoked for assaulting a guy. With me so far. He reapplied a few years later and he got his certificate back. I realise it could be a attempt at humor i suppose some people are easily amused. :hmm: PS Don't give up your day jobs.

 

On this note (@ ordnance) why on earth are you quoting my post before accusing people of being thick?? I was merely wryly agreeing with a former FEO that the reasons why people claim to have lost their licences and the real reason might actually be different in a few cases.

 

Like we often see on PW, when we only get 50% of a story and then the truth leaks out later. Happens all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On this note (@ ordnance) why on earth are you quoting my post before accusing people of being thick?? I was merely wryly agreeing with a former FEO that the reasons why people claim to have lost their licences and the real reason might actually be different in a few cases.

 

Like we often see on PW, when we only get 50% of a story and then the truth leaks out later. Happens all the time.

 

My mistake did not mean to include your post. Edited post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt suffering from depression is a reason to revoke your SGC or FAC though going to the docs with suicidal tendancies could put you on the at risk register and that may flag up at the police station. I suffer from depression and have both certs and it is never been a problem for me :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I got my SGC the FEO did tell me that if there is a domestic dispute it’s now policy to remove the shotguns and suspend the cert until the domestic dispute is resolved.

I have no reason to doubt this is true.

 

I’ll assume that if there are any police related problems then the first thing they do is take away the guns until it’s all resolved.

We know a member here recently had a problem where he lost the guns for a few weeks, but it was all resolved and he got them back.

 

I do wonder if some of these stories are temporary suspension and permanent revocation.

(those are my terms, I’m not sure what the legal terms are if there are any)

 

I also agree with the poster above.

The real reasons for the loss of the cert may not be the ones told to mates.

And even if they are true, it’s possible there’s a whole back story that’s hidden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I got my SGC the FEO did tell me that if there is a domestic dispute it’s now policy to remove the shotguns and suspend the cert until the domestic dispute is resolved.

I have no reason to doubt this is true.

 

I’ll assume that if there are any police related problems then the first thing they do is take away the guns until it’s all resolved.

We know a member here recently had a problem where he lost the guns for a few weeks, but it was all resolved and he got them back.

 

I do wonder if some of these stories are temporary suspension and permanent revocation.

(those are my terms, I’m not sure what the legal terms are if there are any)

 

I also agree with the poster above.

The real reasons for the loss of the cert may not be the ones told to mates.

And even if they are true, it’s possible there’s a whole back story that’s hidden.

 

The thing is that there is no mechanism in law to 'suspend' someones ticket. It's revocation or nothing.

 

I can see that there might be a sensible thing to have but only under the control of law; Parliament should amend the Firearms Act to allow it to happen so that there is proper judicial oversight and a means of appeal so that it doesn't get out of hand. At present, if it's going on, it is completely uncontrolled and is done at the pleasure of the police.

 

The police are not allowed to come round and suspend your driving licence or remove other property from you unless Parliament has given them the power to do so. Why should they be alllowed to take firearms from you?

 

J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reasons that someone is revoked, and the reason that they tell their friends, are quite often not the same.

 

This ^^

 

I met a chap one night who told me about his revocation, and how unjust it was. 6 pints and the full story later I wanted to congratulate the copper that emptied his cabinet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happened mate, Did a nosey neighbour phone the police?

 

yep plod turned and so was the start of a stressful 3 months of being messed about the judge was not impressed as the police had no case they tried to revoke on the grounds of breach of the peace but the complainent stated he never feared for his saftey thats because he was lying through his teeth

Edited by sixhills 69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...