walshie Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 Camelflage!! :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddy Galore! Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 Camelflange!! :lol: don't you mean camel toe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amazed Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 don't you mean camel toe? Hmmmmmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diceman Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 i know that but i first heard about them just after 911 Don't you mean 119? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunderbust Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 Thought you'd appreciate this appaling example from a recent thread: Ok, this will probably **** off loads of people and will doubtless get me accused (again) of being a pointless pedant, but here goes. Over the past couple of years or so, I've noticed an ever increasing trend towards the incorrect and confusing use of terminology among many shooters. The classic, of course, is the use of the term 'heads' or 'bullet heads' in reference to bullets. That has been widepread for a long time with even RFD's using it in their adverts in shooting mags. It's even used in trade price lists. I was talking to a guy yesterday who said he'd recently heard it used by a regional head of a large shooting sports organisation . Ok [OK is usually written as an abbreviation (in capitals)] - [although the dash would suffice, I feel a comma starts the piece off a little less abruptly] this will probably **** off loads of people and will doubtless get me accused (again) of being a pointeless [pointless] pedant but, [place the comma before the word but to prevent the previous clause ending in a preposition] here goes. Over the past couple of years or so [insert comma] I've noticed an ever increasing trend towards [insert the ] incorrect and confusing use of terminology among many shooters. The classic, of course, is the use of the term 'heads' or 'bullet heads' in reference to bullets. That has been widepread for a long time with even RFD's [there is no need for an apostrophe when pluralising initialisms or acronyms where its use doesn't leave things ambiguous] using it in their adverts in the [the use of the here is superfluous] shooting mags. It's even used in trade price lists. I was talking to a guy yesterday who said he'd heard it used by a regional head of a large shooting sports organisation recently [place adjectives next to the applicable word] . People may accuse me of pedantry, but I do think that the incorrect use of language can often make some shooters appear a bit thick . Caveat My version may not even be deemed correct by some, but isn't that the point? English like all language is constantly evolving. We can all try to better ourselves and improve our communication skills, but the alternative is not to communicate at all. I really don't think we want that. I suggest that you police the web and point out every mistake you find. I'm sure you'll achieve inner peace by doing that. I know I have. Oh, and by the way, I won't be available for responses as I'm going out on the pidgons with my 12 gage Lamber wareing camelflage. luv it. :good: :good: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.