Stovepipe Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 (edited) http://tracking-point.com/store <iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yu2EqO1qbrQ?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Edited March 6, 2013 by Stovepipe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diceman Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 Not very British, old boy. Bit of a cheat, what? Although I wouldn't mind a go on one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 Takes the FIELDCRAFT out of it somewhat! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stovepipe Posted March 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 I think our boys in Afghanistan would enjoy a play with one of these systems! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reece Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 I could get one and shoot a 704 yard hare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzy518 Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 Nothing a .17 hmr can't do! Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footu Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 (edited) 'ethical shooting at long range'. I think not. More than one of those shots ended up in the top line or hind quarters. And this is on their demo vid and the're calling ' good shot'. I would be ashamed of it, not you tube it. Edited March 7, 2013 by Footu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stovepipe Posted March 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 'ethical shooting at long range'. I think not. More than one of those shots ended up in the top line or hind quarters. And this is on their demo vid and the're calling ' good shot'. I would be ashamed of it, not you tube it. 'ethical shooting at long range'. I think not. More than one of those shots ended up in the top line or hind quarters. And this is on their demo vid and the're calling ' good shot'. I would be ashamed of it, not you tube it. Tend to agree, but looks great as a military solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gixer1 Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 Disgraceful on live animals! What's the point if its all done for you on a computer! And they way they "sneak up" behind the boulder - what's the need to do that at 800 yards? The reason most stalking shots are taken under 200 yards is that most stalkers/hunters prefer to "stalk" in unnoticed. Why not just legalise the use of mortars on wildlife... :blink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.