Jump to content

To have or not to have..................Shooting Insurance.


cheesypeas
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

I know what you mean and quite agree. What I meant to say was that I would prefer, as the injured party, to be dealing with an insurer, rather than telling the chap who made a mistake that he would have to sell his home to pay the compensation because he was not insured.

Bang on. Not least because on the whole insurers are slightly more pleasant to deal with than solicitors (only just mind)

:good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Eugh...that is scarey!

 

Seen a couple of things recently that is making me want to wear a full face helmet :lol:

We used to have certain teams of guns turn up and the keepers and beaters often referred it to as 'tin hat day'. Same guns were told year after year about their safety (or lack of) and it didn't seem to sink in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some organisations include personal accident cover within the membership package, BASC do for example, as a member if you are injured when shooting for example and suffer a serious injury you can claim off that policy. It will pay £50 for each day you are in hospital, pay out if you lose a part of your body or lose the use of it, it will pay out if you are disabled because of the accident and so on.

 

As said, the main claim will be against the person who injured you, but serious liability claims can take months even years to settle, but the personal accident claims will typically pay out sooner. This will of course help a bit while you are waiting for the liability claim to settle.

 

David

Edited by David BASC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully accept that the personal accident insurance is only a small payment compared to what you may expect to get form a third party, but it’s better than nothing of course…

 

If the person who shoots you is not insured, it’s unlikely they will be in a position to pay you any compensation sadly, and that’s the issue.

 

I don’t think third party cover should become compulsory by legislation but I do think that the shooting community should make it compulsory by default ie make it socially unacceptable to go shooting without insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said much earlier in this thread provided they have household insurance, which the majority will have, you are ok as this provides liability cover for you and family residing with you. From my past life as an insurance underwriter I can assure you the no of instances where people are injured by shooters is very very rare because we are such a wonderful reliable and responsible group of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...