plinker Posted January 27, 2007 Report Share Posted January 27, 2007 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7-2565392,00.html what a load of **** plinker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldrick Posted January 27, 2007 Report Share Posted January 27, 2007 It's a truly appalling article, in an appalling paper. The author came across as an ignorant, Labour-voting little cretin. The article is riddled with errors, and it's just plain awful writing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
il cacciatore Posted January 27, 2007 Report Share Posted January 27, 2007 Some highlights of the neutral language used: Shooting game has replaced gardening as the preferred leisure activity for businessmen. Our correspondent tries it for a day in the killing fields of Suffolk. I soon realise that whatever else shooting is about it is not about exercise. eventual score of 99 corpses. The killing, I am told, is not really the point. I dont know what to make of this artical at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferret Master Posted January 27, 2007 Report Share Posted January 27, 2007 I think scumbag pretty much sums it up. Shame a pheasant or two didn't fall out the sky and spectaularly knock him out or even better... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungler Posted January 27, 2007 Report Share Posted January 27, 2007 What a ****. Deliberately written from up his own **** and looking out down his nose at the subject matter. A true **** and shame on the Times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.