Jump to content

An informative, non biased article on shooting/magpies in the mail&#33


naddan28
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was round the in-laws when my gf was flicking through the mail. I saw the picture of a big maggie so snatched the paper and read the article. It was reasonably informative explaining the increase in magpies and the reasons behind them (less gamekeepers etc) but also used the correct wording Larsson Trap for example. Now we get to the real shocker...he openly said that magpies needed to be managed and mentioned shooting as a way without any snide digs or false acqusations! He even went to the extent of condeming the RSPB for standing by and leaving the maggie population unchecked and said that people needed to except that unless they wanted there gardens filled with crows, maggies and pigeons action was required!

 

Now the mail has gone up in my estimations, something I never thought I would ever say! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was round the in-laws when my gf was flicking through the mail. I saw the picture of a big maggie so snatched the paper and read the article. It was reasonably informative explaining the increase in magpies and the reasons behind them (less gamekeepers etc) but also used the correct wording Larsson Trap for example. Now we get to the real shocker...he openly said that magpies needed to be managed and mentioned shooting as a way without any snide digs or false acqusations! He even went to the extent of condeming the RSPB for standing by and leaving the maggie population unchecked and said that people needed to except that unless they wanted there gardens filled with crows, maggies and pigeons action was required!

 

Now the mail has gone up in my estimations, something I never thought I would ever say! :/

 

Perhaps their sales fell after the RECENT acusations reguarding shooting :good:

 

 

 

 

 

I would still poke it with a stick first to make sure it won't turn on you like a rabid dog!

 

After all it bites BOTH sides :lol:

 

LG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was round the in-laws when my gf was flicking through the mail. I saw the picture of a big maggie so snatched the paper and read the article. It was reasonably informative explaining the increase in magpies and the reasons behind them (less gamekeepers etc) but also used the correct wording Larsson Trap for example. Now we get to the real shocker...he openly said that magpies needed to be managed and mentioned shooting as a way without any snide digs or false acqusations! He even went to the extent of condeming the RSPB for standing by and leaving the maggie population unchecked and said that people needed to except that unless they wanted there gardens filled with crows, maggies and pigeons action was required!

 

Now the mail has gone up in my estimations, something I never thought I would ever say! :/

 

Perhaps their sales fell after the RECENT acusations reguarding shooting :good:

 

 

 

 

 

I would still poke it with a stick first to make sure it won't turn on you like a rabid dog!

 

After all it bites BOTH sides :lol:

 

LG

 

not a more true word spoken excelent reply

roblatch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...