smartshot Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Just booked my appointment with my firearms officer for him to come and see me regarding my firearms application. Ive already got my shotgun so have a pretty good idea what to expect on the day. Im only applying for a .22lr, ive used one now for the last 4 years when with the keeper but wondering if anyone has any handy pointers for on the day? My f/arms officer is very thorough, when I applied for my shotgun, he asked me all sorts of questions, ranges etc and also made senarios up (your out shooting and you see a rabbit in front of a hedge, whats the first thing you think etc) so I want to be fully prepared. I know he quizzed a friend of mine on safe backstops, If he asks I was going to list any dense material that will absorb without causing a ricochet, is there anything I should be wary of? Last out of a matter of interest, does anyone have any reviews on the cz452? My local gunshop has one and if I manage to get my .22 would be quite interested in it. I know some of it may be common sense but wanted to be fully prepared. Many thanks, Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekers Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 FEO's come in all shapes and sizes with all sorts of attitudes and ideas. You already have a head start with him and your experience of shotguns and the .22lr. Just be yourself and don't get clever! As for the CZ 452, yep, its a good bit of kit for the money!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy. Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Have the kettle on standby and expect to be asked about your firearms experience. The more experience and knowledge you can bestow on your FEO, the less restrictions you will get. Just talk about every time you've gone shooting, how you acted towards safety and backstops and do stress that you understand the dangers with rifles. Especially with a .22LR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smartshot Posted April 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Thanks for the info, if he asks me to list suitable backstops, I was going to mention thick woodland (as long as you have permission to shoot woodland), natural banks etc, is there anything else I can add? The trouble is where I shoot with the keeper is 4000+ acres with no roads running through it, limited houses on the boundary and few footpaths. This sounds good but Ive never really had to focus too much (within reason) on suitable backstops. Obvious points such as not shooting onto brows of hills, fields with flint in etc. Thanks again for the info Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekers Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Thanks for the info, if he asks me to list suitable backstops, I was going to mention thick woodland (as long as you have permission to shoot woodland), natural banks etc, is there anything else I can add? The trouble is where I shoot with the keeper is 4000+ acres with no roads running through it, limited houses on the boundary and few footpaths. This sounds good but Ive never really had to focus too much (within reason) on suitable backstops. Obvious points such as not shooting onto brows of hills, fields with flint in etc. Thanks again for the info Rob Look, when you get your FAC you can do what you want, but what makes you think a thick woodland is a good backstop....think SAFETY in your response!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abiteachuck Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 ya who`s to say the wood is clear its any thing but safe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy. Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 (edited) Yeah, avoid saying thick woodland, or you can wave goodbye to ever getting a licence. In fact, don't just list things. Say proactive situations: "A rabbit is in a safe place, but I know there's a road a 1/4 mile behind it. A ricocheting bullet could easily reach the road, so I'd know not to take that shot. It's not what I can see, it's what I can't." Edited April 1, 2010 by harfordwmj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markbivvy Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Im only applying for a .22lr, ive used one now for the last 4 years Only a 22lr. it can still kill people, dont tell the feo its only a 22 lr. if he asks me to list suitable backstops, I was going to mention thick woodland. you may want to re think this bit as well. good luck, you may need it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnum Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Look, when you get your FAC you can do what you want, but what makes you think a thick woodland is a good backstop....think SAFETY in your response!!! thick woodand a new on me ? just stick 2 banks ? 22 subs skip all over the place wet grass?twigs unless u got agood backstop don.t shoot i have got cz452 22lr will not part with it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mosa Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 My f/arms interview if you could call it that was easier than my shotgun application. I suggest that you consider applying for other calibres at the same time (if you want to) ie .17hmr etc as you will quickly learn that the initial cost of £50 for your licence can spiral out of control once you add other calibres etc. Hope this helps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abiteachuck Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Yeah, avoid saying thick woodland, or you can wave goodbye to ever getting a licence. In fact, don't just list things. Say proactive situations: "A rabbit is in a safe place, but I know there's a road a 1/4 mile behind it. A ricocheting bullet could easily reach the road, so I'd know not to take that shot. It's not what I can see, it's what I can't." well put, its called common sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekers Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 That seems to have dealt with thick woodland then..... next question>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trxnav Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 get a signed letter from the keeper mate it will help and like said consider other calibres the worst he can say is no!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smartshot Posted April 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Right I think I need to re word a few bits there, When I say thick wood I meant for instance a rabbit is in front of a tree or stump that I know will not let a .22 round penetrate it and I can see there is no hazards around, not letting rounds off annoymously into woods. I apologise for any confusion. When I said only applying for a .22 I meant im not applying for any other calibres, not its only a .22. The reason Im not applying for other calibres is that I havent had enough experience using them so wanted to get more experience with a .22 first. Another question was in regard to barrel length, the bloke in the gunroom basically said that a .22 only uses the first 7 inches of the barrel and to go for the shortest barrels possible, whats your thoughts on this? im sure its more a matter of prefference but thought I would throw it out there. Thanks for the help, Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smartshot Posted April 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 I got the keeper to write a letter and put it with his reference when he sent it. Like I say I did consider other calibres but thought I would stick with a .22 at first. Its mainly rabbits that are the problem, theres a few foxes but they will be caught up with when they harvest (fingers crossed). Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trxnav Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 consider a .17hmr mate they sometimes prefer to grant as generally thought of as a safer calibre im sure you wont have a problem though good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smartshot Posted April 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Really? I was speaking to another shooter today who sold his .17 because of the amount of ricochet he found? His point was with the higher velocity than a .22 with a smaller projectile compared to other centerfires. Like I said I havent had much experience with cf's so wouldnt know the in's and out's. Whats the effective killing range of a .17, for foxes or rabbits? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy. Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Right I think I need to re word a few bits there, When I say thick wood I meant for instance a rabbit is in front of a tree or stump that I know will not let a .22 round penetrate it and I can see there is no hazards around, not letting rounds off annoymously into woods. I apologise for any confusion. When I said only applying for a .22 I meant im not applying for any other calibres, not its only a .22. The reason Im not applying for other calibres is that I havent had enough experience using them so wanted to get more experience with a .22 first. Another question was in regard to barrel length, the bloke in the gunroom basically said that a .22 only uses the first 7 inches of the barrel and to go for the shortest barrels possible, whats your thoughts on this? im sure its more a matter of prefference but thought I would throw it out there. Thanks for the help, Rob Don't say you'll use the base of a tree for a backstop. Have you ever seen a backstop at an outdoor rifle range?! Don't shorten the barrel too much on your first rifle. You want a nice looking rifle, not a stumpy one. The cz rifles in .22 are amazing and mine has a full length barrel and sound mod and it'll hit a gnat's nuts from a fair old distance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smartshot Posted April 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Okay, he had a couple of second hand cz's that had the shortened barrels but I think for the money ill try to buy new. No I havent been able to find a range near me, nearest I could find was essex, dont know if theres anyone from kent on here who knows of one? Thanks for the advice Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mosa Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 (edited) Really? I was speaking to another shooter today who sold his .17 because of the amount of ricochet he found? His point was with the higher velocity than a .22 with a smaller projectile compared to other centerfires. Like I said I havent had much experience with cf's so wouldnt know the in's and out's. Whats the effective killing range of a .17, for foxes or rabbits? I think it may be the other way around? other cf's the .17 is a rimfire Edited April 1, 2010 by mosa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vipa Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 I think it may be the other way around? other cf's the .17 is a rimfire .17HMRs with ballistic tips just tend to atomize on contact with so much as a blade of grass so I'm led to believe, please feel free to correct me guys.... that makes them much safer than 22lr which, because of thier low speed and limited energy for such a relatively large lump of heavy lead, tend to bounce off just about anything! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekers Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 We seem to be going all over the place with this one. A .22lr can and does ricochet at times, but personally I get pretty fed up hearing all this talk about it, and people suggesting buying other calibres because they are safer. That is b******t!!. You buy a calibre/gun because you have a use/need for it, the .22lr is the biggest selling civil calibre in the world, it must be doing something right! The .17HMR ricochets as does every calibre I have ever owned, including all my centrefires. So lets just contemplate that possibility and move on!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy. Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 .17HMRs with ballistic tips just tend to atomize on contact with so much as a blade of grass so I'm led to believe, please feel free to correct me guys.... that makes them much safer than 22lr which, because of thier low speed and limited energy for such a relatively large lump of heavy lead, tend to bounce off just about anything! Utter nonsense. No calibre is safer than the other and none is immune to riccochets. I have had plenty of HMR bullets whizzing off from all terrains and I would never say something like "here, use this gun because it's safer" every gun is dangerous and has the potential to kill, which means they are all equally as likely to kill someone if used incorrectly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smartshot Posted April 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 I agree with the above, it doesnt matter whether its a rifle, shotgun or air rifle, its whoevers hands it is in that makes it more/less dangerous. Safe shooting Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuck. Posted April 2, 2010 Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 is that a good answer then ..a tree stump is a safe backstop? (I thought they might ricochet) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.