Jump to content

UKIP at it AGAIN!


TIGHTCHOKE
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you deride another race or community as inferior such as the term "Bongo bongo land" then yes, a racist he is.

 

 

Your kidding, right?

 

Exactly who lives in Bongo Bongo land and who are their citizens?

 

UKIP are not racist. They are political party based on libertarian values.

 

The BNP - yes, I think you can class them as racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the belief that races have distinctive cultural characteristics determined by hereditary factors and that this endows some races with an intrinsic superiority over others 2. abusive or aggressive behaviour towards members of another race on the basis of such a belief

Above is quoted directly from the Collins English dictionary. I say again, you might not like his phrasing but he is certainly not stating anything like the above. It's a free world.

 

I don't think it's normal to be gay, am I a homophobe?. I support anyone's right to their own sexuality and would defend it to the hilt. Some people don't think it's normal to own guns. Where do we stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So by using the words bongo bongo land he is refering to a land that does not exist so he should be treated in a psychiatric wing of a hospital as he is talking rubbish, or is that a UKIP membership trait?

 

You tell me how it is racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simples, he is belittling someone of a different ethnic background. If he isn`t then he is in need of help.

 

BTW - if UKIP are a libertarian organisation what are they doing for those of other views such as radical clerics, is their political view any less valid? Why do they believe in state intervention, are they just a certain type of libertarian group i.e. My way or the highway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simples, he is belittling someone of a different ethnic background. If he isn`t then he is in need of help.

 

BTW - if UKIP are a libertarian organisation what are they doing for those of other views such as radical clerics, is their political view any less valid? Why do they believe in state intervention, are they just a certain type of libertarian group i.e. My way or the highway?

 

So which ethnicities are they belittling?

 

I didn't say they were a libertarian organisation - I said they had libertarian values. If someone wants to come to the UK and be a guest here - they should adhere to British values. Some radical clerics don't - and in fact they put two fingers up to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simples, he is belittling someone of a different ethnic background. If he isn`t then he is in need of help.

 

BTW - if UKIP are a libertarian organisation what are they doing for those of other views such as radical clerics, is their political view any less valid? Why do they believe in state intervention, are they just a certain type of libertarian group i.e. My way or the highway?

 

Henry you may strongly disagree with the wording, but the UKIP message has a lot of fans.

 

A lot of voters strongly disagree with the waffle and downright lies issued by the other parties, and prefer the direct, no-nonsense noises coming from UKIP.

 

Why should we send £sqillions to countries that have nuclear bombs and millions of underfed, starving people when their rulers live in palaces? Not only that, but these countries are the 1st to jump on the ethnic bandwagon when it comes to knocking the UK.

 

The Aussie don't mess about, and they don't seem to have some of the issues that we have......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARIS - If he isn`t belittling anyone then he is speaking total rubbish. He is just twisting his words, as you are, as he has been caught out.

Put as simply as I can, he has belittled every country that gets aid from the UK so therefore he has referred to each of these in a belittling way and as such I feel that I can refer to him as a racist.

 

**edited due to cross post.

Edited by henry d
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might do well to look up the BNP and see how many ex Labour members they have......don't see that being highlighted though...not damaging to UKIP you see.....

I see people on facebook who I know are staunch Labour men through and through posting the EDL's pictures so please don'y bother with the UKIP=Racist mantra...I don't buy it and neither do the majority.

Scaremongering out of fear of the rise of something which threatens to challenge the existence of those who sit in Ivory Towers.

 

Bongo Bongo land to me is a representation of a 3rd world country which is a recipient of our ridiculously generous aid programme and I see nothing wrong with it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Henry you may strongly disagree with the wording, but the UKIP message has a lot of fans.

 

A lot of voters strongly disagree with the waffle and downright lies issued by the other parties, and prefer the direct, no-nonsense noises coming from UKIP.

 

Why should we send £sqillions to countries that have nuclear bombs and millions of underfed, starving people when their rulers live in palaces? Not only that, but these countries are the 1st to jump on the ethnic bandwagon when it comes to knocking the UK.

 

The Aussie don't mess about, and they don't seem to have some of the issues that we have......

 

The issue, as you say, is his choice of words, otherwise we would not have a story here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking up on your point about his wording, whilst I do not like the words used against the country we all live in by the extremist clerics, it's free speech so I might not agree with those words, but I have to defend free speech, same with UKIP, it's a free world and as Dead-Eyed has pointed out, a lot of people are turning to UKIP.

 

Personally, whilst agreeing with a lot of what they say, there is not enough detail behind the economic side of things so I will not be voting for them just yet but if they get that side of things right, they will get my vote.

 

Aussies have got it bang on in my view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id be happy with that "My way or the Highway" Its about time someone stood up for our country.

 

My point exactly, that ideal is authoritarian not libertarian and whilst people such as Godfrey may bandy the term about they only use it as they see fit. I have to admit that he will make a good politician with his weasel words and his attempts to brave it out when caught out fairly and squarely, but the fact remains, he is a racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARIS - If he isn`t belittling anyone then he is speaking total rubbish. He is just twisting his words, as you are, as he has been caught out.

Put as simply as I can, he has belittled every country that gets aid from the UK so therefore he has referred to each of these in a belittling way and as such I feel that I can refer to him as a racist.

 

Putting Britain first isn't racist, it patriotic. I think you may have your definitions muddled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

My point exactly, that ideal is authoritarian not libertarian and whilst people such as Godfrey may bandy the term about they only use it as they see fit. I have to admit that he will make a good politician with his weasel words and his attempts to brave it out when caught out fairly and squarely, but the fact remains, he is a racist.

It would seem your views are in the minority......not racist at all but offensive to lovers of PC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aussies have got it bang on in my view.

 

The aussie mantra for immigrants is FIFO. Fit In or **** Off.

 

Problem is as soon as anyone has the gall to ask guests to this country to fit in, they call the race card.

 

I suspect UKIP will get a huge boost in support in 2014 when British borders open up even further - something which we as a sovereign nation will have no control over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Putting Britain first isn't racist, it patriotic. I think you may have your definitions muddled.

 

The two are different and cannot be muddled, though you have tried to. I stand by my words, if you belittle another race/ethnicity then you are a racist, no matter how much you twist it about with rhetoric and there is nothing wrong with patriotism unless it is used against another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...