Jump to content

.223 application help


Thatguy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi guys. I've got an area of land about 40 acres with plenty of rabbits and foxes on. Just wondering if I'd be able to get a .223 and a .22lr on my first application or if they'd deny the .223 so they can see that I am responsible before
allowing anything bigger than a .22lr. Also would 40 acres be enough for a .223 (its not near houses).

Thanks for the help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would put in for both as you have nothing to loose. The feo will know what calibres if any has been cleared for that piece of land. The land will determine what can be granted. Hills and steep slops would favour over open and flat land. Good back stops most important along with no roads or footpaths crossing your permission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

best bet ring your fao , tell him what you posted and ask him what your chances are that way you will know exactly where you stand

I agree. This approach asks for advice and does not seem challenging when you have no experience. If your area FEO's are helpful it would be the best course. 40 acres seems a bit light to me for a .223 on grant and for a .22 CF but then, it could all be in a valley (both sides).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a smallholder with 11 acres who has a .223 for fox.

I was initially refused a .22 on 250 acres - no footpaths etc. I also know someone refused a .223 on a 15 acre field despite agreeing he would only shoot from a high seat at foxes.

Since there seem to be no standards, we all make judgements on likelihood - thats all I have done. We shall see how benevolent the posters police force are; lets hope he gets what he needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jimmydean

what reason did they give for refusal on 250 acres? ???

It was a long time ago and in Cheshire. The reason given was that there was nowhere suitable on the land that was not dangerous.

I sent them a letter (being very angry that such a stupid decision had been made) saying however big the land was, it must be the person that is suitable since anyone could walk to the edge of the land and shoot over, even on a 1000 acres therefore it was the person who was safe, not the land. I had to try and fight my own corner with (then) little knowledge of the way the game is played.

I was given the .22 though, since I had land in Herefordshire and they approved it. It started a lifetime trend of questioning so-called experts. I have found those with very fixed opinions tend not to want their judgement tested by anyone - especially in the police.

I also look forward to a day when people, not land, is the criterion on which an FAC is awarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...