badgerman Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 dont worry not another 'which semi is best?' question, but i am rather confused by the beretta range, can anyone clarify the differences between the 390, 391, al391, al391 field and urika? i've got my eye on a al391 field but i'm not sure exactly what the 'field' part of it is about, and how it differs, if at all to the urika? anyone with a bit of knowledge on it, help much appreciated. cheers, BM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BSA Shaun Posted May 3, 2007 Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 dont worry not another 'which semi is best?' question, but i am rather confused by the beretta range, can anyone clarify the differences between the 390, 391, al391, al391 field and urika? i've got my eye on a al391 field but i'm not sure exactly what the 'field' part of it is about, and how it differs, if at all to the urika? anyone with a bit of knowledge on it, help much appreciated. cheers, BM I'm sure all the answers you require will be present here - Beretta UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter-peter Posted May 3, 2007 Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 dont worry not another 'which semi is best?' question, but i am rather confused by the beretta range, can anyone clarify the differences between the 390, 391, al391, al391 field and urika? i've got my eye on a al391 field but i'm not sure exactly what the 'field' part of it is about, and how it differs, if at all to the urika? anyone with a bit of knowledge on it, help much appreciated. cheers, BM they all use the same recycling system as used for years. the only difference is the looks and handling I have just changed my 391 tecknys for an older 390 gold mallard. same system. looks a lot different externally my mate as an old 303. its just the same gas system as the latest guns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arjimlad Posted May 3, 2007 Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 I read somewhere that the 391 was developed because of the switch to 24g loads and is slimmer in the action than the 390. My 302 handled 28g clay loads no problem as does my 390. Field is the "game" model rather than the sporting one which is for clays. Not that I'd use mine on any driven game shoot !! My sporting 390 is great on bunnies & pigeon though. I don't know which models are called Ulrika though.. I had a feeling the AL390 had that moniker for a while as well. Bit daft calling a gun after a swedish presenter so I'm glad it's not emblazoned across the butt or anything like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerman Posted May 3, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 cheers for the help, i am very close to buying now, just brushing up on the last few details and trying to persuade myself to take the leap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitebridges Posted May 3, 2007 Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 .....daft calling a gun after a swedish presenter so I'm glad it's not emblazoned across the butt or anything like that. B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter-peter Posted May 3, 2007 Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 I read somewhere that the 391 was developed because of the switch to 24g loads and is slimmer in the action than the 390. My 302 handled 28g clay loads no problem as does my 390. Field is the "game" model rather than the sporting one which is for clays. Not that I'd use mine on any driven game shoot !! My sporting 390 is great on bunnies & pigeon though. I don't know which models are called Ulrika though.. I had a feeling the AL390 had that moniker for a while as well. Bit daft calling a gun after a swedish presenter so I'm glad it's not emblazoned across the butt or anything like that. my 390 wiil cycle 24 gramm loads all day long no probs same with the 391 cheers for the help, i am very close to buying now, just brushing up on the last few details and trying to persuade myself to take the leap. B) get jumped in wi both feet badg you'l be buying a beretta skeet vest soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckytrigger Posted May 3, 2007 Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 Mine is the urika field with 28 inch barrel. Lovely gun that hasnt misfed any of the 28 and 32g carts its fed on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter-peter Posted May 4, 2007 Report Share Posted May 4, 2007 dont worry not another 'which semi is best?' question, but i am rather confused by the beretta range, can anyone clarify the differences between the 390, 391, al391, al391 field and urika? i've got my eye on a al391 field but i'm not sure exactly what the 'field' part of it is about, and how it differs, if at all to the urika? anyone with a bit of knowledge on it, help much appreciated. cheers, BM the al 391 field is an excellent light gun 100% reliable and will recycle owt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.