markbivvy Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/6960166.stm hang em, twice to make SURE they ARE dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markio Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 Just saw this on the TV news. Apparently when sentencing the judge took into account the guilty plea and that he was a man of faith. MAN OF ******* FAITH?!?!?!?! What the **** has that got to do with anything? I turned the TV off and me and my wife reminded each other that's why we don't watch the news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEFTY478 Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 This is completely sick, even his own sister says she is astounded by the judges decision. 14 years (of proven) preditory paedophile behaviour around kids between 18 months & 14 years old results in a "talk to a nice doctor and try not to do it again, for the next three years" order? The judge, Tom Crowther must be sacked! How can he be given public money, to not act in our best interests? Ol' Bill often get a hard time from the public, but they have my sypathy today. They must be mad, I mean really spitting mad about this outcome, a three year bender! Pathetic, absolutely pathetic - 24 cases of either indecent assault or gross indecency - that has got'a'be worth at least a year, each? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham M Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 The judge opted not to jail Porter after hearing he had undergone therapy and was a changed man. Paedophiles DON’T change, they just get more cunning. The judge wants his ar$e kicking before they sack the stupid ****. No wonder the country is going down the tubes. G.M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEFTY478 Posted September 21, 2007 Report Share Posted September 21, 2007 This case has, thankfully, been refered to The Courts' of Appeal. - Paedophile sentence under review Hopefully now he'll get the good long portion of cold lumpy porridge he deserves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al4x Posted September 21, 2007 Report Share Posted September 21, 2007 If you think that is bad have a look at this, hanging by the testicles till dead would be too quick! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tees/7002627.stm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEFTY478 Posted September 21, 2007 Report Share Posted September 21, 2007 If you think that is bad have a look at this, hanging by the testicles till dead would be too quick! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tees/7002627.stm Erm, interesting that the scumbag's own brief didn't object (penultimate paragrapg) to referring the case to Crown Court - which has increased sentensing powers. A lawyer without a stone cold heart? Now that is refreshing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.