THAIBOXER Posted September 6, 2008 Report Share Posted September 6, 2008 BANNING AIGUNS..... ANYONE COULD KILL ANOTHER WITH... A STANLEY KNIFE A BALLPOINT PEN A BUTTER KNIFE A SCREWDRIVER A HAMMER A BRICK A PIECE OF ROPE ITS NOT THE ITEM ITS THE PERSON USING IT.(AS YOU ALL KNOW) SOLUTION...... HARDER PENALTIES. LIFE MEANS LIFE,NOT OUT EARLY FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR. GET THESE PARLIAMENT BIGWIGS,WHO GO WEEKLY SHOPPING IN THIER JAGS AND LEXUS' AND PAY WITH THIER FAT CREDIT CARD TO GET IN THE REAL WORLD. ALL THEY DO IS "HECKLE" LIKE THE TWO OLD **** IN THE BALCONY ON"THE MUPPETS". COMMENTS GUYS??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAN88 Posted September 6, 2008 Report Share Posted September 6, 2008 there talk all this rubbish just for votes just to keep all the left wing anti,s and do good ers on side thats why all the country is in the state its in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MM Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 its the nut behind the butt that does the damage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airssassin Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 I remember rolling up newspapers and bending them in half when I was a lad - you could band a nail into wood with them... I think they were called "Millwall Bricks". If you can use a newspaper as a weapon then almost everything should be banned. Also, newspapers are quite dangerous in other respects... Eating chips from them - clogged arteries and poison from the print Lighting fires with them - arson / bad for the environment Reading them - the most dangerous thing of all!! 90% of a newspaper is pure PR (bull****)! Air rifles are comparitively safe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magdie Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 I remember rolling up newspapers and bending them in half when I was a lad - you could band a nail into wood with them... I think they were called "Millwall Bricks". If you can use a newspaper as a weapon then almost everything should be banned. Also, newspapers are quite dangerous in other respects... Eating chips from them - clogged arteries and poison from the print Lighting fires with them - arson / bad for the environment Reading them - the most dangerous thing of all!! 90% of a newspaper is pure PR (bull****)! Air rifles are comparitively safe I do not often reply online, but I think the above is spot on. The so called PC ***-holes are taking the guts out of the country, it is the person behind the gun not the gun itself. One day they will wake out of their do good coma and just realise what they have done not only to everyday Joe Blogs, but OUR Nation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabbithunter2008 Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 I remember rolling up newspapers and bending them in half when I was a lad - you could band a nail into wood with them... I think they were called "Millwall Bricks". If you can use a newspaper as a weapon then almost everything should be banned. Also, newspapers are quite dangerous in other respects... Eating chips from them - clogged arteries and poison from the print Lighting fires with them - arson / bad for the environment Reading them - the most dangerous thing of all!! 90% of a newspaper is pure PR (bull****)! Air rifles are comparitively safe To true Get a piece off copper pipe and a rubber glove add tape, you get a very deadly weapon that you can get rid off in 10 secs. So why ban a air guns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biffo1262 Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 (edited) I think banning airguns is a none starter and certainly a vote killer. In a recent survey on this very subject the overwhelming response (78%) was for NO ban. However I believe some form of stricter control is inevitable given recent tragic history. How many of us would or could argue against that if it saves just one more child's life. Alright it would be inconvenient but that's all; inconvenient. I'll trade inconvenience for a child's life any day. Steve Edited September 11, 2008 by Biffo1262 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd90 Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 First they take awya our guns, then they take away our liberty's anyone read 1984 ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattw Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 First they take awya our guns, then they take away our liberty's anyone read 1984 ?? Read it??? Were living it!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starlight32 Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Trouble is fella's you end up responsible for the actions of other's.... No win situation I see it now. Read my post in the off topic section titled 'Armed Response' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJaxeman Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Yea ban the lot of them worked for hand guns the bunch of bloody muppetts LOL LOL LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.